FLS vs BKR vs IR Stock Comparison

Flowserve, Baker Hughes and Ingersoll Rand Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ITT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLS Flowserve Corp
$71.79 -3.1% 1M +36.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.01B
P/E
39.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.70B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
2 wins
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$54.66 -4.3% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$54.19B
P/E
18.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.74B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oilfield Services Energy
5 wins
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$75.50 -1.2% 1M -4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$30.07B
P/E
31.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.94B
Div. yield
0.00%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Baker Hughes leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Baker Hughes 5, Ingersoll Rand 5, Flowserve 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLSBKRIRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.01B $54.19B $30.07B BKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.3x 18.7x 31.4x BKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.5x 21.5x 22.5x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.2% +3.7% +7.8% IR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.4% 10.1% 12.1% IR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 8.3% 7.6% BKR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 2.9x 1.8x IR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% BKR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.3% +14.2% -4.2% FLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +16.9%/yr +7.0%/yr BKR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.9% 34.4% 33.0% IR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 46/100 59/100 IR

Percentile Scorecard

FLSBKRIR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLSBKRIR
Valuation 31 #141 of 203 33 #32 of 47 44 #114 of 203
Growth 31 #130 of 188 64 #16 of 43 72 #54 of 188
Profitability 43 #106 of 184 74 #11 of 40 72 #53 of 184
Financial Health 33 #146 of 217 16 #38 of 45 51 #107 of 217
Shareholder Returns 72 #44 of 153 45 #18 of 32 57 #67 of 153
Overall 42 46 59
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • IR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLSBKRIRSPY
1 month -3.1%-4.3%-1.2% +0.9%
3 months +2.7%-6.9%-10.8% +5.9%
6 months -14.8%-20.6%-2.5% +8.5%
Year to date +3.5%+20.0%-4.7% +13.3%
1 year +36.3%+14.2%-4.2% +12.4%
3 years +100.3%+57.0%+27.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.1%+16.2%+8.3% +23.5%
5 years +113.5%+117.9%+40.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +16.4%+16.9%+7.0% +11.0%
10 years +70.1%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +5.5%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFLSBKRIRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.9%34.4%33.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%35.9%31.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.770.681.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.740.41-0.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-47.2%-36.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.0%-21.5%-23.6% -0.9%
52-week high $92.04$69.67$98.76 $779.14
52-week low $52.66$44.47$68.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLSBKRIR
P/E now vs peer median 35.8xmedian 25.4x 18.7xmedian 28.7x 30.7xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.3x 3.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 14.3x 13.8xmedian 8.7x 16.7xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.2xmedian 21.8x 16.8xmedian 16.3x 24.0xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.2x 2.6xmedian 1.7x 2.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 15.56median 1.41 0.91median 0.51 2.47median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLSBKRIR
Revenue $4.70B $28.74B $7.94B
Gross profit $1.60B $6.83B $3.40B
Operating income $467.63M $3.43B $1.44B
Net income $273.27M $2.93B $966.00M
Free cash flow $153.66M $3.23B $1.22B
R&D – $573.00M –
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $2.90 $2.45
Cash & equivalents $742.15M $4.07B $1.17B
Total debt $2.06B $18.26B $4.77B
Shares (diluted) 127.96M 998.00M 391.90M
Enterprise value $6.98B $15.91B $25.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLSBKRIR
P/E 35.8x 18.7x 30.7x
P/FCF 59.2x 16.8x 24.0x
P/Operating cash flow 39.6x 12.0x 21.7x
P/S 1.9x 1.9x 3.7x
P/B 3.8x 2.6x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 5.0x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA 18.1x 13.8x 16.7x
EV/EBIT 22.3x 20.0x 22.9x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 2.4x 4.1x
EV/FCF 67.8x 21.2x 27.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 45.3x 15.2x 24.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 15.56 0.91 2.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLSBKRIR
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.2% 3.7% 7.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.8% 5.4% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 3.2% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.2% 5.8% 9.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.1% 3.8% 28.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 13.8% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.5% 0.0% 82.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 19.9% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -42.3% -0.4% 87.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 20.5% 12.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -67.3% 35.2% -5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 14.2% 9.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.6% 54.5% -6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 19.5% 9.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLSBKRIR
Gross margin 34.2% 23.8% 42.8%
EBITDA margin 12.3% 17.2% 24.8%
Operating margin 10.0% 11.9% 18.1%
Pretax margin 7.6% 11.2% 15.2%
Net margin 5.4% 10.1% 12.1%
FCF margin 3.3% 11.2% 15.4%
Operating cash flow margin 4.9% 15.7% 17.0%
Return on equity 11.6% 14.4% 9.4%
Return on assets 4.3% 5.2% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 8.3% 7.6%
Return on capital employed 9.7% 8.9% 9.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLSBKRIR
Debt / assets 32.4% 30.9% 26.2%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.9x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 2.9x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 13.4x 5.7x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 65.2% 43.7%
Equity / assets 37.6% 34.8% 56.3%
Interest coverage 5.1x – 5.6x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.65 1.58 3.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLSBKRIR
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.7% 0.1%
Net buyback yield 1.4% – 2.8%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 1.7% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 31.1% 3.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.2% 2.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2% -2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.5% -1.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLSBKRIR
Forward P/E 16.5xFY2026 21.5xFY2026 22.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.34FY2026 $2.54FY2026 $3.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.2%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +10.6% +21.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.72BFY2026 $30.90BFY2026 $8.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.3% -1.5% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLSBKRIR
Held by institutions 100.0% 97.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 584 1,148 894
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% +5.2% -1.5%
Institutions buying 299 576 367
Institutions selling 201 429 360
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.34 1.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLSBKRIR
FLS 1.00 0.30 0.49
BKR 0.30 1.00 0.22
IR 0.49 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLS, BKR and IR?

Baker Hughes (BKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowserve (FLS) $10.01B, Baker Hughes (BKR) $54.19B, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $30.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLS, BKR and IR?

Baker Hughes (BKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowserve (FLS) 39.3x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 18.7x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 31.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Flowserve (FLS) 16.5x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 21.5x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 22.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowserve (FLS) +0.2%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +3.7%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +7.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) has the highest net margin (Flowserve (FLS) 5.4%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 10.1%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 12.1%). On return on invested capital, Baker Hughes (BKR) leads (Flowserve (FLS) 8.1%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 8.3%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Flowserve (FLS) returned the most: Flowserve (FLS) +36.3%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +14.2%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) -4.2%. Over five years, Baker Hughes (BKR) compounded fastest (Flowserve (FLS) +16.4%/yr, Baker Hughes (BKR) +16.9%/yr, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Baker Hughes (BKR) has the highest dividend yield: Flowserve (FLS) 0.00%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 0.02%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.00%. Flowserve (FLS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingersoll Rand (IR) has been the steadiest (Flowserve (FLS) 48.9%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 34.4%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLS, BKR and IR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Baker Hughes (BKR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.