FCCN vs IONQ vs QBTS Stock Comparison

Spectral Capital, IonQ and D-Wave Quantum Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SPIR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.90 -0.5% 1M -13.2% 1Y
Market cap
$182.95M
P/E
3,721x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
IONQ IonQ, Inc.
$28.18 -35.6% 1M -54.8% 1Y
Market cap
$10.74B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$246.47M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
4 wins
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.
$10.09 -36.0% 1M -72.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.75B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.43M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

IonQ leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (IonQ 4, Spectral Capital 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCCNIONQQBTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $182.95M $10.74B $3.75B IONQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3,721x -7.4x -15.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +370.6% -44.2% IONQ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.0% -567.8% -2,001.6% FCCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -12.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.2% -54.8% -72.8% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.9%/yr +0.5%/yr IONQ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 110.1% 90.3% 100.0% IONQ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 25/100 32/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

FCCNIONQQBTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCCNIONQQBTS
Valuation 52 #60 of 124 14 #107 of 124 19 #101 of 124
Growth 42 #66 of 113 19 #92 of 113 12 #100 of 113
Profitability 62 #43 of 110 13 #96 of 110 16 #93 of 110
Financial Health 16 #109 of 129 77 #31 of 129 92 #11 of 129
Shareholder Returns 27 #49 of 67 3 #65 of 67 23 #52 of 67
Overall 40 25 32
  • FCCN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • IONQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QBTS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCCNIONQQBTSSPY
1 month -0.5%-35.6%-36.0% -2.3%
3 months -62.4%-27.4%-49.5% -0.7%
6 months -6.9%-38.4%-51.8% +4.8%
Year to date -54.0%-37.2%-61.4% +10.3%
1 year -13.2%-54.8%-72.8% +10.3%
3 years —+143.4%+1,046.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+34.5%+125.6% +20.1%
5 years —+83.6%+2.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+12.9%+0.5% +10.1%

Risk

MeasureFCCNIONQQBTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 110.1%90.3%100.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 100.9%83.7%92.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.013.584.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.12-0.61-0.73 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.6%-90.0%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.8%-60.9%-69.5% -3.5%
52-week high $5.55$72.07$33.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.83$26.59$10.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCCNIONQQBTS
P/E now vs peer median 3,721xmedian 35.6x -7.4xmedian 35.6x -15.0xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 4.2x 43.6xmedian 4.2x 302.1xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 334.3xmedian 30.0x -10.1xmedian 30.0x -20.1xmedian 30.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -71.1xmedian 25.2x -22.2xmedian 25.2x -31.5xmedian 25.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.2x 3.2xmedian 3.2x 3.5xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 123.13median 1.21 0.08median 1.21 10.11median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCCNIONQQBTS
Revenue $668.63M $246.47M $12.43M
Gross profit $8.35M $72.26M $7.98M
Operating income -$6.62M -$1.01B -$170.58M
Net income -$21.19K -$1.37B -$248.70M
Free cash flow -$2.57M -$483.87M -$119.08M
R&D – $448.76M $81.78M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-3.81 $-0.67
Cash & equivalents $5.27M $1.24B $296.64M
Total debt – – $35.03M
Shares (diluted) 94.89M 367.66M 370.84M
Enterprise value $172.25M $3.12B $898.27M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQBTS
P/E 3,721x -7.4x -15.0x
P/FCF -71.1x -22.2x -31.5x
P/Operating cash flow -71.4x -23.7x -33.9x
P/S 0.3x 43.6x 302.1x
P/B 3.2x 3.2x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 9.3x 4.2x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 334.3x -10.1x -20.1x
EV/EBIT -26.9x -8.6x -19.0x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 35.0x 261.0x
EV/FCF -69.0x -17.8x -27.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -69.4x -19.1x -29.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 123.13 0.08 10.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQBTS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 370.6% -44.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1,948% 146.9% 19.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 156.5% -56.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 276.8% 83.0% 31.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -83.7% -174.2% -116.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -304.6% -109.4% -27.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.4% -194.3% 11.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.4% -129.1% -45.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.9% -106.1% 28.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.2% -88.9% -1.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -28.6% -213.6% -119.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.1% -98.7% -28.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.2% -212.0% -124.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.6% -97.9% -30.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQBTS
Gross margin 1.2% 29.3% 64.2%
EBITDA margin 0.1% -345.7% -1,297%
Operating margin -1.0% -408.2% -1,373%
Pretax margin 0.0% -571.3% -1,267%
Net margin 0.0% -567.8% -2,002%
FCF margin -0.4% -196.3% -958.4%
Operating cash flow margin -0.4% -183.5% -892.4%
Return on equity 0.1% -32.8% -11.7%
Return on assets 0.0% -20.3% -10.9%
Return on invested capital – – -12.3%
Return on capital employed -4.7% -15.5% -14.8%
Asset turnover 2.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 120.9x 0.3x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 186.1% 250.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQBTS
Debt / assets – – 3.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.2x
Debt / FCF – – -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 50.7% 6.5%
Equity / assets 25.7% 49.3% 93.5%
Interest coverage – – -180.3x
Current ratio 0.8x 10.7x 20.5x
Quick ratio 0.8x 9.8x 20.1x
Cash ratio 0.0x 9.4x 20.0x
Altman Z-score 3.19 1.34 28.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQBTS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.1% -27.9% -1.6%
Shareholder yield -1.1% -27.9% -1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCCNIONQQBTS
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.36FY2026 $-0.31FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $458.50MFY2026 $40.06MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +252.6%FY2026 +62.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +71.5% +112.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCCNIONQQBTS
Held by institutions – 53.3% 53.1%
Institutions holding – 782 551
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.4% +12.5%
Institutions buying – 537 370
Institutions selling – 154 101
Buyers to sellers – 3.49 3.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCCNIONQQBTS
FCCN 1.00 0.07 0.09
IONQ 0.07 1.00 0.86
QBTS 0.09 0.86 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCCN, IONQ and QBTS?

IonQ (IONQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Spectral Capital (FCCN) $182.95M, IonQ (IONQ) $10.74B, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) $3.75B.

Which company is growing faster?

IonQ (IONQ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: IonQ (IONQ) +370.6%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -44.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Spectral Capital (FCCN) has the highest net margin (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%, IonQ (IONQ) -567.8%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -2,001.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: Spectral Capital (FCCN) -13.2%, IonQ (IONQ) -54.8%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -72.8%. Over five years, IonQ (IONQ) compounded fastest (IonQ (IONQ) +12.9%/yr, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) +0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, IonQ (IONQ) has been the steadiest (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 110.1%, IonQ (IONQ) 90.3%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) 100.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCCN, IONQ and QBTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, IonQ (IONQ) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.