EZPW vs SLM vs STNE Stock Comparison

Ezcorp, Slm and StoneCo Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AFRM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EZPW Ezcorp Inc
$28.72 -6.9% 1M +59.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.77B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.58B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins
SLM SLM Corp
$17.52 -22.4% 1M -36.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.20B
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.79B
Div. yield
2.97%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins
STNE StoneCo Ltd.
$7.49 -35.5% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.35B
P/E
2.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
33.78%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ezcorp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ezcorp 5, StoneCo 4, Slm 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEZPWSLMSTNELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.77B $3.20B $2.35B SLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.2x 5.9x 2.8x STNE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.0x 7.9x 4.2x STNE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.6% -6.7% +18.3% EZPW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 30.9% 26.2% SLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.8% 16.6% — SLM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x — EZPW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.97% 33.78% STNE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.6% -36.0% -60.7% EZPW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.8%/yr -1.0%/yr -24.4%/yr EZPW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.9% 43.1% 65.6% EZPW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 48/100 80/100 STNE

Percentile Scorecard

EZPWSLMSTNE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEZPWSLMSTNE
Valuation 73 #47 of 168 49 #87 of 168 92 #14 of 168
Growth 90 #17 of 163 29 #116 of 163 87 #22 of 163
Profitability 72 #44 of 154 52 #74 of 154 86 #22 of 154
Financial Health 90 #17 of 161 37 #102 of 161 34 #107 of 161
Shareholder Returns 30 #95 of 136 75 #35 of 136 99 #2 of 136
Overall 71 48 80
  • EZPW ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • SLM ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • STNE ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEZPWSLMSTNESPY
1 month -6.9%-22.4%-35.5% -5.9%
3 months -1.6%-36.1%-32.4% -4.6%
6 months -12.7%-22.7%-32.2% +0.2%
Year to date +47.9%-35.3%-49.4% +7.5%
1 year +59.6%-36.0%-60.7% +8.2%
3 years +237.9%+18.1%-29.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +50.1%+5.7%-11.2% +19.0%
5 years +268.2%-5.0%-75.3% +56.5%
5 years, per year +29.8%-1.0%-24.4% +9.4%
10 years +199.2%+151.0%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +11.6%+9.6%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureEZPWSLMSTNESPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.9%43.1%65.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.6%52.8%74.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.271.111.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.39-0.83-0.92 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.9%-49.1%-77.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.3%-43.2%-60.7% -5.9%
52-week high $35.59$30.85$19.04 $779.14
52-week low $17.41$17.52$7.39 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEZPWSLMSTNE
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 11.9x 5.9xmedian 11.9x 2.8xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.7x 1.8xmedian 2.7x 0.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 12.1x 4.0xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 5.4x -8.4xmedian 5.4x 2.8xmedian 5.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.17median 0.34 0.20median 0.34 0.03median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEZPWSLMSTNE
Revenue $1.58B $1.79B $2.73B
Gross profit $927.76M – $1.19B
Operating income $220.26M – $1.03B
Net income $159.09M $567.40M $584.68M
Free cash flow $138.33M -$381.64M $842.18M
EPS (diluted) $1.90 $2.98 $2.62
Cash & equivalents $311.03M $2.17B $1.42B
Total debt $519.49M $6.43B –
Shares (diluted) 83.36M 185.57M 273.49M
Enterprise value $167.99M -$13.14B -$3.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMSTNE
P/E 11.2x 5.9x 2.8x
P/FCF 12.8x -8.4x 2.8x
P/Operating cash flow 9.7x -8.4x 3.0x
P/S 1.1x 1.8x 0.9x
P/B 1.5x 1.4x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.4x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 7.6x 4.0x –
EV/EBIT 9.0x 4.0x 0.8x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 4.1x 0.3x
EV/FCF 14.3x -19.5x 0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x -19.5x 1.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.17 0.20 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMSTNE
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.6% -6.7% 18.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 1.6% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.3% – 13.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.4% – -16.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.4% – 1,432%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% – -10.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 62.2% -9.0% 99.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.8% 19.1% 54.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 60.5% 3.4% 89.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 66.8% 28.7% 84.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.8% -15.8% 415.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.3% -47.7% 22.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% -15.8% 236.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.6% -47.7% 15.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMSTNE
Gross margin 58.6% – 43.7%
EBITDA margin 16.3% 104.4% –
Operating margin 13.9% – 37.5%
Pretax margin 13.4% 41.2% 19.8%
Net margin 10.0% 30.9% 26.2%
FCF margin 8.7% -21.3% 30.8%
Operating cash flow margin 11.5% -21.3% 28.5%
Return on equity 13.8% 24.0% 35.1%
Return on assets 7.4% 1.9% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 9.8% 16.6% –
Return on capital employed 11.5% – 28.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 2.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMSTNE
Debt / assets 24.0% 21.6% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 2.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 3.8x -16.9x –
Liabilities / assets 46.1% 92.4% 84.4%
Equity / assets 53.9% 7.6% 15.6%
Interest coverage 6.7x 1.7x 1.2x
Current ratio 4.8x – 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.6x – 0.2x
Cash ratio 1.3x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.10 – 1.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMSTNE
Dividend yield – 3.0% 33.8%
Net buyback yield 0.5% 17.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.5% 20.0% 33.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 17.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -26.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -7.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEZPWSLMSTNE
Forward P/E 15.0xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 4.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.91FY2026 $2.21FY2026 $1.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 -36.1%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.0% +29.4% +15.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.57BFY2026 $1.85BFY2026 $2.89BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 -6.7%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% -0.8% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEZPWSLMSTNE
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 59.4%
Institutions holding 315 389 273
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +2.4% -7.6%
Institutions buying 140 194 148
Institutions selling 116 135 81
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.44 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EZPWSLMSTNE
EZPW 1.00 0.29 0.20
SLM 0.29 1.00 0.13
STNE 0.20 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EZPW, SLM and STNE?

Slm (SLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ezcorp (EZPW) $1.77B, Slm (SLM) $3.20B, StoneCo (STNE) $2.35B.

Which stock is cheaper, EZPW, SLM and STNE?

StoneCo (STNE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ezcorp (EZPW) 11.2x, Slm (SLM) 5.9x, StoneCo (STNE) 2.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, StoneCo (STNE) is cheapest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 15.0x, Slm (SLM) 7.9x, StoneCo (STNE) 4.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ezcorp (EZPW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ezcorp (EZPW) +28.6%, Slm (SLM) -6.7%, StoneCo (STNE) +18.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slm (SLM) has the highest net margin (Ezcorp (EZPW) 10.0%, Slm (SLM) 30.9%, StoneCo (STNE) 26.2%). On return on invested capital, Slm (SLM) leads (Ezcorp (EZPW) 9.8%, Slm (SLM) 16.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ezcorp (EZPW) returned the most: Ezcorp (EZPW) +59.6%, Slm (SLM) -36.0%, StoneCo (STNE) -60.7%. Over five years, Ezcorp (EZPW) compounded fastest (Ezcorp (EZPW) +29.8%/yr, Slm (SLM) -1.0%/yr, StoneCo (STNE) -24.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

StoneCo (STNE) has the highest dividend yield: Ezcorp (EZPW) 0.00%, Slm (SLM) 2.97%, StoneCo (STNE) 33.78%. Ezcorp (EZPW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ezcorp (EZPW) has been the steadiest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 42.9%, Slm (SLM) 43.1%, StoneCo (STNE) 65.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EZPW, SLM and STNE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ezcorp (EZPW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.