DASH vs GRAB vs HEPS Stock Comparison

DoorDash, Grab Holdings and D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DIDIY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$179.00 -4.3% 1M -32.7% 1Y
Market cap
$78.47B
P/E
73.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.06B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.76 -11.5% 1M -54.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.07B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

DoorDash leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (DoorDash 4, Grab Holdings 3, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDASHGRABHEPSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.47B $11.07B $1.04B DASH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 73.8x 19.4x -7.8x GRAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 64.4x 17.2x — GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +35.0% +21.5% — DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 15.3% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -6.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -32.7% -54.4% +4.9% HEPS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.7%/yr -26.2%/yr -9.3%/yr DASH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.3% 38.5% 55.4% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 55/100 — DASH

Percentile Scorecard

DASHGRABHEPS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDASHGRABHEPS
Valuation 16 #140 of 166 46 #90 of 166 20 #83 of 104
Growth 87 #21 of 153 79 #33 of 153 –
Profitability 72 #44 of 153 45 #84 of 153 –
Financial Health 51 #88 of 179 51 #89 of 179 38 #69 of 110
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 56 55 –
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • HEPS ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDASHGRABHEPSSPY
1 month -4.3%-11.5%+10.7% +0.7%
3 months -9.4%-18.8%-4.5% +3.7%
6 months +6.1%-27.7%+0.4% +7.1%
Year to date -21.0%-44.7%+12.5% +12.8%
1 year -32.7%-54.4%+4.9% +11.9%
3 years +144.5%-11.0%+132.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +34.7%-3.8%+32.5% +22.8%
5 years -8.1%-78.1%-38.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.7%-26.2%-9.3% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureDASHGRABHEPSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.3%38.5%55.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%39.5%59.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.381.390.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.65-1.410.09 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.5%-86.5%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.7%-54.5%-15.2% -1.2%
52-week high $266.06$6.07$3.29 $779.14
52-week low $146.60$2.71$2.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDASHGRABHEPS
P/E now vs peer median 73.2xmedian 16.7x 19.8xmedian 16.7x -7.8xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x 0.5xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.7x 27.1xmedian 12.7x —median 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.2xmedian 10.5x 56.8xmedian 10.5x 4.8xmedian 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x 21.3xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.71median 0.39 —median 0.39 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDASHGRABHEPS
Revenue $17.06B $3.73B –
Gross profit – $1.63B –
Operating income $896.00M $120.00M –
Net income – $525.00M –
Free cash flow – $193.00M –
R&D $1.85B $417.00M –
EPS (diluted) $2.42 $0.14 –
Cash & equivalents $5.05B $2.86B $263.27M
Total debt – $2.99B $13.89M
Shares (diluted) 439.35M 4.21B –
Enterprise value $78.47B -$4.05B $118.14M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDASHGRABHEPS
P/E 73.2x 19.8x -7.8x
P/FCF 31.2x 56.8x 4.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 84.3x –
P/S 4.5x 2.9x 0.5x
P/B 7.2x 1.6x 21.3x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 1.6x 21.3x
EV/EBITDA – 27.1x –
EV/EBIT – 73.5x –
EV/Revenue 4.5x 2.4x –
EV/FCF – 45.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 67.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.71 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDASHGRABHEPS
Revenue growth (1Y) 35.0% 21.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.9% 23.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 69.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 29.3% 340.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.9% 28.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 837.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 35.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 23.9% 82.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 42.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -82.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -76.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 40.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDASHGRABHEPS
Gross margin – 43.6% –
EBITDA margin – 8.7% –
Operating margin – 3.2% –
Pretax margin – 13.9% –
Net margin – 15.3% –
FCF margin – 5.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 3.5% –
Return on equity 10.3% 7.9% –
Return on assets 5.3% 4.2% –
Return on invested capital – 1.5% –
Return on capital employed – 1.7% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – 6.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDASHGRABHEPS
Debt / assets – 15.1% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -6.5x –
Debt / FCF – 10.5x –
Liabilities / assets 47.9% 49.7% 94.6%
Equity / assets 52.1% 50.3% 5.4%
Interest coverage – 1.1x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.5x 0.9x
Quick ratio – 0.8x 0.4x
Cash ratio – 0.8x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – -0.25 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDASHGRABHEPS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDASHGRABHEPS
Forward P/E 64.4xFY2026 17.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $-0.55FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +79.1% +12.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.88BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026 $2.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +37.6%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.2% +33.7% +41.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDASHGRABHEPS
Held by institutions 88.2% 75.6% 6.9%
Institutions holding 1,044 484 33
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +0.9% +1.3%
Institutions buying 578 231 15
Institutions selling 350 168 13
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.38 1.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DASHGRABHEPS
DASH 1.00 0.37 0.09
GRAB 0.37 1.00 0.05
HEPS 0.09 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DASH, GRAB and HEPS?

DoorDash (DASH) is the largest by market capitalisation: DoorDash (DASH) $78.47B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.07B, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) $1.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, DASH, GRAB and HEPS?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DoorDash (DASH) 73.8x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.4x, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) -7.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (DoorDash (DASH) 64.4x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DoorDash (DASH) +35.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) returned the most: DoorDash (DASH) -32.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -54.4%, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) +4.9%. Over five years, DoorDash (DASH) compounded fastest (DoorDash (DASH) -1.7%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -26.2%/yr, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) -9.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (DoorDash (DASH) 50.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.5%, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS) 55.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DASH, GRAB and HEPS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, DoorDash (DASH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.