CWGL vs CFOO Stock Comparison

Crimson Wine and China Foods Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.15 -6.1% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$83.79M
P/E
119.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
6 wins
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Crimson Wine leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Crimson Wine 6, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGLCFOOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.79M $21.26M CWGL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 119.0x -65.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% -46.6% CWGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.0% -173.8% CWGL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.0% +59.1% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.9%/yr -16.2%/yr CWGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.6% 75.4% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 20/100 CWGL

Percentile Scorecard

CWGLCFOO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGLCFOO
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 14 #45 of 52
Growth 25 #25 of 33 51 #25 of 50
Profitability 50 #16 of 31 9 #41 of 45
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 7 #52 of 56
Shareholder Returns 14 #20 of 23 –
Overall 46 20
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGLCFOOSPY
1 month -6.1%0.0% -0.8%
3 months +3.8%+59.1% +3.5%
6 months -3.9%+59.1% +7.0%
Year to date -15.3%+59.1% +12.2%
1 year -21.0%+59.1% +13.0%
3 years -24.5%-58.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -9.0%-25.1% +23.1%
5 years -52.6%-58.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.9%-16.2% +11.0%
10 years -55.5%+4.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year -7.8%+0.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCWGLCFOOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.6%75.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.690.78 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-74.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.0%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $5.25$1.05 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGLCFOO
P/E now vs peer median 121.4xmedian 26.6x -65.8xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.5x 114.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 14.2x -67.3xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 18.3x -60.4xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x -15.0xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -25.03median 2.09 -5.30median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGLCFOO
Revenue $72.36M $185.87K
Gross profit $32.85M $14.61K
Operating income -$2.29M -$323.18K
Net income $704.00K -$323.11K
Free cash flow -$31.77M -$352.34K
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $11.84M $15.92K
Total debt $36.85M –
Shares (diluted) 20.59M 20.25M
Enterprise value $13.45M $21.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOO
P/E 121.4x -65.8x
P/FCF -2.7x -60.4x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x -60.4x
P/S 1.2x 114.4x
P/B 0.5x -15.0x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -15.0x
EV/EBITDA 20.3x -67.3x
EV/EBIT -48.3x -65.8x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 114.3x
EV/FCF -3.5x -60.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x -60.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -25.03 -5.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOO
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% -46.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% -70.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 74.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -199.9% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -59.1% 14.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 12.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 12.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 292.2% 17.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.4% -20.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,125% 20.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -71.7% -20.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOO
Gross margin 45.4% 7.9%
EBITDA margin 7.5% -169.8%
Operating margin -3.2% -173.9%
Pretax margin 1.5% -173.8%
Net margin 1.0% -173.8%
FCF margin -43.9% -189.6%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% -189.6%
Return on equity 0.4% –
Return on assets 0.3% -152.0%
Return on invested capital -0.7% –
Return on capital employed -1.0% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOO
Debt / assets 15.6% –
Debt / equity 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x –
Debt / FCF -1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 756.1%
Equity / assets 78.8% -656.1%
Interest coverage -1.6x –
Current ratio 10.5x 0.1x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.0x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.31 -21.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOO
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGLCFOO

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGLCFOO
Held by institutions 17.4% –
Institutions holding 5 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% –
Institutions buying 2 –
Institutions selling 2 –
Buyers to sellers 1.00 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGLCFOO
CWGL 1.00 -0.10
CFOO -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWGL and CFOO?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crimson Wine (CWGL) $83.79M, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M.

Which company is growing faster?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) has the highest net margin (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: Crimson Wine (CWGL) -21.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%. Over five years, Crimson Wine (CWGL) compounded fastest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -13.9%/yr, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.6%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CWGL and CFOO move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.10, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CWGL and CFOO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.