CWGL vs CFOO vs STZ Stock Comparison

Crimson Wine, China Foods Holdings and Constellation Brands Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.01 -9.3% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$82.76M
P/E
117.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
2 wins
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Constellation Brands leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Constellation Brands 7, Crimson Wine 2, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGLCFOOSTZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $82.76M $21.26M $22.14B STZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 117.6x -65.8x 11.5x STZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 10.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% -46.6% -4.3% CWGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.0% -173.8% 19.8% STZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.7% — 11.8% STZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x — 3.2x STZ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.6% +59.1% -5.3% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.5%/yr -16.2%/yr -9.6%/yr STZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.7% 75.6% 31.5% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 20/100 62/100 STZ

Percentile Scorecard

CWGLCFOOSTZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGLCFOOSTZ
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 14 #45 of 52 89 #5 of 38
Growth 22 #26 of 33 51 #25 of 50 19 #27 of 33
Profitability 50 #16 of 31 9 #41 of 45 90 #4 of 31
Financial Health 75 #10 of 37 7 #52 of 56 22 #29 of 37
Shareholder Returns 14 #20 of 23 – 91 #3 of 23
Overall 45 20 62
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • STZ ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGLCFOOSTZSPY
1 month -9.3%0.0%+14.9% -0.2%
3 months +0.2%+59.1%-1.1% +3.9%
6 months -7.4%+59.1%-16.0% +8.2%
Year to date -18.2%+59.1%-5.3% +12.9%
1 year -23.6%+59.1%-5.3% +12.3%
3 years -27.1%-58.0%-43.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -10.0%-25.1%-17.2% +23.3%
5 years -54.2%-58.7%-39.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -14.5%-16.2%-9.6% +10.9%
10 years -57.8%+4.0%-21.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year -8.3%+0.4%-2.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCWGLCFOOSTZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.7%75.6%31.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.0%—30.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.100.03-0.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.770.78-0.17 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-74.0%-58.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.6%0.0%-21.7% -1.2%
52-week high $5.25$1.05$166.68 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.66$112.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGLCFOOSTZ
P/E now vs peer median 117.3xmedian 26.1x -65.8xmedian 18.5x 11.6xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.6x 114.4xmedian 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 14.0x -67.3xmedian 12.9x 10.1xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 18.1x -60.4xmedian 18.6x 12.0xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.6x -15.0xmedian 2.2x 2.5xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -24.18median 2.07 -5.30median 0.97 1.04median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGLCFOOSTZ
Revenue $72.36M $185.87K $9.70B
Gross profit $32.85M $14.61K $4.85B
Operating income -$2.29M -$323.18K $2.78B
Net income $704.00K -$323.11K $1.92B
Free cash flow -$31.77M -$352.34K $1.84B
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.02 $11.28
Cash & equivalents $11.84M $15.92K $98.50M
Total debt $36.85M – $10.32B
Shares (diluted) 20.59M 20.25M 170.60M
Enterprise value $12.42M $21.15M $21.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOSTZ
P/E 117.3x -65.8x 11.6x
P/FCF -2.6x -60.4x 12.0x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x -60.4x 8.3x
P/S 1.1x 114.4x 2.3x
P/B 0.4x -15.0x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 0.4x -15.0x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x -67.3x 10.1x
EV/EBIT -47.0x -65.8x 11.6x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 114.3x 3.3x
EV/FCF -3.4x -60.3x 17.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x -60.3x 12.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -24.18 -5.30 1.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOSTZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% -46.6% -4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -3.9% -2.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% -70.4% -2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 74.5% -0.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -199.9% 31.3% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -59.1% 14.4% -2.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6% 57.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 12.4% 8.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6% 62.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 12.4% 11.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 292.2% 17.0% -4.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.4% -20.9% -0.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,125% 20.6% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -71.7% -20.9% 6.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOSTZ
Gross margin 45.4% 7.9% 50.0%
EBITDA margin 7.5% -169.8% 32.9%
Operating margin -3.2% -173.9% 28.7%
Pretax margin 1.5% -173.8% 25.5%
Net margin 1.0% -173.8% 19.8%
FCF margin -43.9% -189.6% 19.0%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% -189.6% 27.4%
Return on equity 0.4% – 23.0%
Return on assets 0.3% -152.0% 9.1%
Return on invested capital -0.7% – 11.8%
Return on capital employed -1.0% – 14.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.4x 1.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOSTZ
Debt / assets 15.6% – 46.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x – 3.2x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 756.1% 59.8%
Equity / assets 78.8% -656.1% 40.2%
Interest coverage -1.6x – –
Current ratio 10.5x 0.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.27 -21.59 2.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOSTZ
Dividend yield – – 3.1%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 3.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 36.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 38.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGLCFOOSTZ
Forward P/E – – 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $12.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +4.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $8.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -5.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGLCFOOSTZ
Held by institutions 17.4% – 83.7%
Institutions holding 5 – 1,032
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% – +1.3%
Institutions buying 2 – 408
Institutions selling 2 – 449
Buyers to sellers 1.00 – 0.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGLCFOOSTZ
CWGL 1.00 -0.10 -0.13
CFOO -0.10 1.00 -0.04
STZ -0.13 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWGL, CFOO and STZ?

Constellation Brands (STZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crimson Wine (CWGL) $82.76M, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Constellation Brands (STZ) $22.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, CWGL, CFOO and STZ?

Constellation Brands (STZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 117.6x, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -65.8x, Constellation Brands (STZ) 11.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Constellation Brands (STZ) -4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Constellation Brands (STZ) has the highest net margin (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 19.8%). On return on invested capital, Constellation Brands (STZ) leads (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 11.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: Crimson Wine (CWGL) -23.6%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Constellation Brands (STZ) -5.3%. Over five years, Constellation Brands (STZ) compounded fastest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -14.5%/yr, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Constellation Brands (STZ) -9.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Crimson Wine (CWGL) 0.00%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 0.03%. Crimson Wine (CWGL) and China Foods Holdings (CFOO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.7%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.6%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 31.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWGL, CFOO and STZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Constellation Brands (STZ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.