CWGL vs CFOO vs BF-B Stock Comparison

Crimson Wine, China Foods Holdings and Brown Forman Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.15 -6.1% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$83.79M
P/E
119.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
3 wins
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
BF-B Brown Forman Corp
$28.99 +10.8% 1M +3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$13.10B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.07B
Div. yield
0.03%
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brown Forman leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Brown Forman 6, Crimson Wine 3, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGLCFOOBF-BLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.79M $21.26M $13.10B BF-B
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 119.0x -65.8x 18.2x BF-B
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% -46.6% +0.7% CWGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.0% -173.8% 14.2% BF-B
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.7% — 12.4% BF-B
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x — 2.0x BF-B
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.0% +59.1% +3.7% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.9%/yr -16.2%/yr -15.9%/yr CWGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.6% 75.4% 39.0% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 20/100 61/100 BF-B

Percentile Scorecard

CWGLCFOOBF-B

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGLCFOOBF-B
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 14 #45 of 52 68 #13 of 38
Growth 25 #25 of 33 51 #25 of 50 28 #24 of 33
Profitability 50 #16 of 31 9 #41 of 45 77 #8 of 31
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 7 #52 of 56 73 #11 of 38
Shareholder Returns 14 #20 of 23 – –
Overall 46 20 61
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • BF-B ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGLCFOOBF-BSPY
1 month -6.1%0.0%+10.8% -0.8%
3 months +3.8%+59.1%+5.9% +3.5%
6 months -3.9%+59.1%+5.1% +7.0%
Year to date -15.3%+59.1%+11.2% +12.2%
1 year -21.0%+59.1%+3.7% +13.0%
3 years -24.5%-58.0%-47.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -9.0%-25.1%-19.3% +23.1%
5 years -52.6%-58.7%-58.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.9%-16.2%-15.9% +11.0%
10 years -55.5%+4.0%-20.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year -7.8%+0.4%-2.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCWGLCFOOBF-BSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.6%75.4%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.8%—37.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.03-0.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.690.780.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-74.0%-70.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.0%0.0%-6.1% -1.8%
52-week high $5.25$1.05$30.88 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.66$22.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGLCFOOBF-B
P/E now vs peer median 121.4xmedian 26.6x -65.8xmedian 18.6x 18.4xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.5x 114.4xmedian 1.6x 2.6xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 14.2x -67.3xmedian 13.0x 14.2xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 18.3x -60.4xmedian 18.4x 14.4xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x -15.0xmedian 2.1x 3.4xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -25.03median 2.09 -5.30median 0.97 -37.41median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGLCFOOBF-B
Revenue $72.36M $185.87K $5.07B
Gross profit $32.85M $14.61K $2.38B
Operating income -$2.29M -$323.18K $993.00M
Net income $704.00K -$323.11K $721.00M
Free cash flow -$31.77M -$352.34K $925.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.02 $1.57
Cash & equivalents $11.84M $15.92K $301.00M
Total debt $36.85M – $2.44B
Shares (diluted) 20.59M 20.25M 459.52M
Enterprise value $13.45M $21.15M $11.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOBF-B
P/E 121.4x -65.8x 18.4x
P/FCF -2.7x -60.4x 14.4x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x -60.4x 13.1x
P/S 1.2x 114.4x 2.6x
P/B 0.5x -15.0x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -15.0x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA 20.3x -67.3x 14.2x
EV/EBIT -48.3x -65.8x 15.6x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 114.3x 3.0x
EV/FCF -3.5x -60.3x 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x -60.3x 15.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -25.03 -5.30 -37.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOBF-B
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% -46.6% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -3.9% -2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% -70.4% 1.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 74.5% -2.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -199.9% 31.3% -8.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -59.1% 14.4% -3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6% -14.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 12.4% -2.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 143.6% 33.6% -12.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 12.4% -0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 292.2% 17.0% 36.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.4% -20.9% 26.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,125% 20.6% 58.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -71.7% -20.9% 44.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOBF-B
Gross margin 45.4% 7.9% 46.8%
EBITDA margin 7.5% -169.8% 21.4%
Operating margin -3.2% -173.9% 19.6%
Pretax margin 1.5% -173.8% 17.6%
Net margin 1.0% -173.8% 14.2%
FCF margin -43.9% -189.6% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% -189.6% 20.0%
Return on equity 0.4% – 18.0%
Return on assets 0.3% -152.0% 9.2%
Return on invested capital -0.7% – 12.4%
Return on capital employed -1.0% – 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.4x 1.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOBF-B
Debt / assets 15.6% – 31.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x – 2.0x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 756.1% 49.3%
Equity / assets 78.8% -656.1% 50.7%
Interest coverage -1.6x – 9.6x
Current ratio 10.5x 0.1x 3.3x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.0x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.31 -21.59 4.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGLCFOOBF-B
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 59.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 46.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGLCFOOBF-B

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGLCFOOBF-B
Held by institutions 17.4% – 42.7%
Institutions holding 5 – 596
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% – -1.4%
Institutions buying 2 – 283
Institutions selling 2 – 210
Buyers to sellers 1.00 – 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGLCFOOBF-B
CWGL 1.00 -0.10 -0.08
CFOO -0.10 1.00 -0.05
BF-B -0.08 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CWGL, CFOO and BF-B?

Brown Forman (BF-B) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crimson Wine (CWGL) $83.79M, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Brown Forman (BF-B) $13.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, CWGL, CFOO and BF-B?

Brown Forman (BF-B) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 119.0x, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -65.8x, Brown Forman (BF-B) 18.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Brown Forman (BF-B) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brown Forman (BF-B) has the highest net margin (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Brown Forman (BF-B) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Brown Forman (BF-B) leads (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%, Brown Forman (BF-B) 12.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: Crimson Wine (CWGL) -21.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Brown Forman (BF-B) +3.7%. Over five years, Crimson Wine (CWGL) compounded fastest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -13.9%/yr, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Brown Forman (BF-B) -15.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Crimson Wine (CWGL) 0.00%, Brown Forman (BF-B) 0.03%. Crimson Wine (CWGL) and China Foods Holdings (CFOO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.6%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.4%, Brown Forman (BF-B) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CWGL, CFOO and BF-B?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brown Forman (BF-B) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.