CRSP vs SLBT vs TSHA Stock Comparison

CRISPR Therapeutics AG, SL Science Holding and Taysha Gene Therapies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CRSP CRISPR Therapeutics AG
$54.26 -3.1% 1M -13.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.24B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$13.39M
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

CRISPR Therapeutics AG leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (CRISPR Therapeutics AG 4, Taysha Gene Therapies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRSPSLBTTSHALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.24B $2.55B $1.37B CRSP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -11.6x — -10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -64.8% — -32.3% TSHA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3,368.7% — -2,728.0% TSHA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -22.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x — 2.7x TSHA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.3% -88.7% -15.8% CRSP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.9%/yr — -23.1%/yr CRSP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.3% 175.5% 71.5% CRSP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 — 49/100 TSHA

Percentile Scorecard

CRSPSLBTTSHA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRSPSLBTTSHA
Valuation 51 #308 of 624 11 #556 of 624 45 #343 of 624
Growth 32 #412 of 601 – 16 #503 of 601
Profitability 32 #367 of 541 – 28 #390 of 541
Financial Health 71 #188 of 647 58 #271 of 647 75 #160 of 647
Shareholder Returns 38 #222 of 359 – 78 #79 of 359
Overall 45 – 49
  • CRSP ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • SLBT ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • TSHA ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRSPSLBTTSHASPY
1 month -3.1%-36.1%-15.4% +0.7%
3 months +12.0%-56.5%-28.2% +3.7%
6 months +3.7%-87.4%-34.0% +7.1%
Year to date +3.5%-88.9%-23.3% +12.8%
1 year -13.3%-88.7%-15.8% +11.9%
3 years +39.4%—+86.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +11.7%—+23.2% +22.8%
5 years -40.6%—-73.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -9.9%—-23.1% +10.9%
10 years +224.1%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +12.5%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRSPSLBTTSHASPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.3%175.5%71.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.8%170.0%69.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.840.241.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.51-0.22 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.7%-91.0%-96.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.2%-90.9%-39.5% -1.2%
52-week high $63.99$12.81$6.98 $779.14
52-week low $44.34$1.15$3.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRSPSLBTTSHA
P/E now vs peer median -11.6xmedian 17.8x —median 17.8x -10.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 391.6xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x 250.3xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.7xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x -6.4xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -14.1xmedian 21.7x -1,359xmedian 21.7x -10.4xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.2x 365.9xmedian 2.2x 3.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -3.01median 0.35 —median 0.35 -0.26median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRSPSLBTTSHA
Revenue $13.39M – $5.49M
Operating income -$534.34M – -$153.16M
Net income -$451.14M – -$149.63M
Free cash flow -$371.33M – -$132.57M
R&D $278.15M – $123.14M
EPS (diluted) $-4.67 – $-0.41
Cash & equivalents $291.34M $8.31M $455.41M
Total debt $586.20M – $49.26M
Shares (diluted) 96.51M – 369.04M
Enterprise value -$3.45B $2.54B $23.66M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRSPSLBTTSHA
P/E -11.6x – -10.4x
P/FCF -14.1x -1,359x -10.4x
P/Operating cash flow -14.2x – -10.4x
P/S 391.6x – 250.3x
P/B 3.0x 365.9x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 365.9x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA -6.7x – -6.4x
EV/EBIT -6.5x – -6.3x
EV/Revenue 258.9x – 176.2x
EV/FCF -9.3x – -7.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -9.4x – -7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.01 – -0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRSPSLBTTSHA
Revenue growth (1Y) -64.8% – -32.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -57.1% – -9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.3% – -62.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.1% – -8.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 3.6% – -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – -6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.0% – -30.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.9% – 40.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.8% – -61.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.5% – -35.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -14.1% – -60.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.9% – -29.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRSPSLBTTSHA
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -3,850% – -2,770%
Operating margin -3,990% – -2,792%
Pretax margin -3,346% – -2,593%
Net margin -3,369% – -2,728%
FCF margin -2,773% – -2,417%
Operating cash flow margin -2,760% – -2,410%
Return on equity -25.3% – -47.5%
Return on assets -16.8% – -36.9%
Return on invested capital -22.6% – –
Return on capital employed -20.9% – -42.6%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 510.2% – 331.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRSPSLBTTSHA
Debt / assets 22.1% – 10.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x – 2.7x
Debt / FCF -1.6x – -0.4x
Liabilities / assets 34.1% 21.8% 17.7%
Equity / assets 65.9% 78.2% 82.3%
Interest coverage – – -3,647x
Current ratio 17.8x 4.4x 17.8x
Quick ratio 17.8x 4.3x 17.5x
Cash ratio 17.8x 4.3x 17.5x
Altman Z-score 2.69 – 7.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRSPSLBTTSHA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -8.1% – -0.2%
Shareholder yield -8.1% 0.0% -0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRSPSLBTTSHA
EPS, next fiscal year $-4.10FY2026 – $-0.47FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $38.73MFY2026 – $1.96MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1,003.4%FY2026 – -80.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +266.1% – +1,298.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRSPSLBTTSHA
Held by institutions 78.9% – 81.2%
Institutions holding 519 – 209
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% – +12.7%
Institutions buying 238 – 140
Institutions selling 139 – 42
Buyers to sellers 1.71 – 3.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRSPSLBTTSHA
CRSP 1.00 -0.04 0.44
SLBT -0.04 1.00 -0.03
TSHA 0.44 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRSP, SLBT and TSHA?

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is the largest by market capitalisation: CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) $5.24B, SL Science Holding (SLBT) $2.55B, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) $1.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -64.8%, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -32.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) has the highest net margin (CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -3,368.7%, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -2,728.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) returned the most: CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -13.3%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) -88.7%, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -15.8%. Over five years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) compounded fastest (CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -9.9%/yr, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -23.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) has been the steadiest (CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) 57.3%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) 175.5%, Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) 71.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRSP, SLBT and TSHA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.