CRM vs RDCM vs SMWB Stock Comparison

Salesforce, Radcom and Similarweb Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (INTA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CRM Salesforce, Inc.
$227.21 -1.1% 1M -10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$185.56B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.94B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
5 wins
RDCM Radcom Ltd
$10.18 -2.2% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$161.77M
P/E
18.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
IT Operations Software Technology
3 wins
SMWB Similarweb Ltd.
$8.77 +8.4% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$731.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$295.61M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Salesforce leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Salesforce 5, Radcom 3, Similarweb 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRMRDCMSMWBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $185.56B $161.77M $731.97M CRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.2x 18.3x -33.6x RDCM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.9x 27.5x 39.9x CRM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.2% — +10.2% CRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.0% — -7.4% CRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.7% -22.7% +5.7% SMWB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.9%/yr -2.8%/yr -15.1%/yr RDCM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.0% 47.9% 80.6% CRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 89/100 35/100 RDCM

Percentile Scorecard

CRMRDCMSMWB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRMRDCMSMWB
Valuation 75 #26 of 99 97 #5 of 124 29 #71 of 99
Growth 72 #28 of 98 82 #21 of 114 61 #39 of 98
Profitability 87 #13 of 96 87 #15 of 111 42 #56 of 96
Financial Health 44 #63 of 111 91 #12 of 128 22 #87 of 111
Shareholder Returns 73 #19 of 67 – 21 #53 of 67
Overall 70 89 35
  • CRM ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • RDCM ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SMWB ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRMRDCMSMWBSPY
1 month -1.1%-2.2%+8.4% -1.0%
3 months +17.8%+1.7%+17.9% -0.4%
6 months +25.4%-36.4%+185.7% +4.5%
Year to date -14.2%-22.2%+17.1% +12.4%
1 year -10.7%-22.7%+5.7% +13.6%
3 years +9.5%+32.0%+72.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year +3.1%+9.7%+19.9% +20.8%
5 years -26.1%-13.1%-55.8% +63.7%
5 years, per year -5.9%-2.8%-15.1% +10.4%
10 years +205.5%-42.5%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +11.8%-5.4%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCRMRDCMSMWBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.0%47.9%80.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.9%52.4%89.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.420.741.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.470.07 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.2%-46.9%-88.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.7%-36.9%-5.4% -1.6%
52-week high $266.23$16.14$9.27 $779.14
52-week low $150.12$9.91$2.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRMRDCMSMWB
P/E now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 25.3x 18.7xmedian 41.0x -34.2xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.8x —median 4.4x 2.6xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 16.5x —median 28.9x -299.6xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 16.1x —median 23.9x 49.4xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.8x 1.4xmedian 3.1x 33.5xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 0.84 0.19median 1.36 -1.13median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRMRDCMSMWB
Revenue $43.94B – $295.61M
Gross profit $33.96B – $235.99M
Operating income $8.74B – -$11.06M
Net income $9.66B $9.48M -$21.78M
Free cash flow $15.15B – $15.44M
R&D $6.37B – $73.83M
EPS (diluted) $11.77 $0.53 $-0.26
Cash & equivalents $8.31B $12.61M $73.90M
Total debt $39.29B – –
Shares (diluted) 821.00M 16.84M 84.82M
Enterprise value $141.43B -$272.97M $454.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRMRDCMSMWB
P/E 19.3x 18.7x -34.2x
P/FCF 12.3x – 49.4x
P/Operating cash flow 11.9x – 53.8x
P/S 4.3x – 2.6x
P/B 4.9x 1.4x 33.5x
P/Tangible book 5.8x 1.4x 33.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.4x – -299.6x
EV/EBIT 24.6x 10.0x -62.3x
EV/Revenue 4.9x – 2.3x
EV/FCF 14.2x – 44.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.6x – 48.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 0.19 -1.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRMRDCMSMWB
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.2% – 10.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – 12.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.7% – 12.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.3% – 14.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% – 50.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 47.8% – 42.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.0% -17.4% 25.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 82.9% 96.3% 27.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.9% -24.1% 28.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 94.5% 97.8% 30.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.6% – -30.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.3% – 33.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 21.3% – -29.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.1% – 32.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRMRDCMSMWB
Gross margin 77.3% – 79.8%
EBITDA margin 34.0% – -0.8%
Operating margin 19.9% – -3.7%
Pretax margin 28.2% – -5.9%
Net margin 22.0% – -7.4%
FCF margin 34.5% – 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 35.8% – 4.8%
Return on equity 26.7% 8.0% -108.3%
Return on assets 8.9% 6.4% -8.8%
Return on invested capital 9.0% – –
Return on capital employed 10.7% 4.7% -19.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 8.3% – 6.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRMRDCMSMWB
Debt / assets 35.8% – –
Debt / equity 1.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x – –
Debt / FCF 2.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 65.0% 19.9% 91.9%
Equity / assets 35.0% 80.1% 8.1%
Interest coverage 9.4x – –
Current ratio 0.8x 6.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 6.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 5.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.54 – 0.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRMRDCMSMWB
Dividend yield 0.8% – –
Net buyback yield 18.3% – -0.3%
Shareholder yield 19.1% – -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRMRDCMSMWB
Forward P/E 12.9xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 39.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.65FY2026 $0.37FY2026 $0.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.0%FY2026 -66.1%FY2026 +266.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -5.3% +24.3% +36.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $43.89BFY2026 $56.61MFY2026 $332.14MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.7%FY2026 -20.8%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.7% +2.7% +0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRMRDCMSMWB
Held by institutions 80.7% 53.3% 45.9%
Institutions holding 2,474 54 68
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.8% +2.3% -7.8%
Institutions buying 1,005 29 36
Institutions selling 1,271 16 18
Buyers to sellers 0.79 1.81 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRMRDCMSMWB
CRM 1.00 0.10 0.27
RDCM 0.10 1.00 0.21
SMWB 0.27 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRM, RDCM and SMWB?

Salesforce (CRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Salesforce (CRM) $185.56B, Radcom (RDCM) $161.77M, Similarweb (SMWB) $731.97M.

Which stock is cheaper, CRM, RDCM and SMWB?

Radcom (RDCM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Salesforce (CRM) 19.2x, Radcom (RDCM) 18.3x, Similarweb (SMWB) -33.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Salesforce (CRM) is cheapest (Salesforce (CRM) 12.9x, Radcom (RDCM) 27.5x, Similarweb (SMWB) 39.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Salesforce (CRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Salesforce (CRM) +11.2%, Similarweb (SMWB) +10.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Salesforce (CRM) has the highest net margin (Salesforce (CRM) 22.0%, Similarweb (SMWB) -7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Similarweb (SMWB) returned the most: Salesforce (CRM) -10.7%, Radcom (RDCM) -22.7%, Similarweb (SMWB) +5.7%. Over five years, Radcom (RDCM) compounded fastest (Salesforce (CRM) -5.9%/yr, Radcom (RDCM) -2.8%/yr, Similarweb (SMWB) -15.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Salesforce (CRM) has been the steadiest (Salesforce (CRM) 47.0%, Radcom (RDCM) 47.9%, Similarweb (SMWB) 80.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRM, RDCM and SMWB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Salesforce (CRM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.