CPNG vs RVLV vs UBER Stock Comparison

Coupang, Revolve and Uber Technologies Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HEPS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CPNG Coupang, Inc.
$16.44 +13.9% 1M -45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$29.07B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.16B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
RVLV Revolve Group, Inc.
$19.04 -10.2% 1M -14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
20.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.37B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc
$68.79 -0.4% 1M -25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$140.99B
P/E
40.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.53B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Uber Technologies leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Uber Technologies 8, Revolve 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPNGRVLVUBERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.07B $1.35B $140.99B UBER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -21.3x 20.4x 40.7x RVLV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.6x 19.7x UBER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.4% +14.7% +13.9% RVLV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.8% 4.8% 6.1% UBER
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.6% — 12.4% UBER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.7x — 0.7x UBER
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.6% -14.2% -25.8% RVLV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.3%/yr -25.3%/yr +7.8%/yr UBER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.5% 49.0% 35.2% UBER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 54/100 62/100 UBER

Percentile Scorecard

CPNGRVLVUBER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPNGRVLVUBER
Valuation 7 #101 of 108 33 #73 of 108 49 #86 of 166
Growth 6 #98 of 104 61 #41 of 104 78 #35 of 154
Profitability 17 #86 of 103 59 #43 of 103 74 #41 of 154
Financial Health 36 #73 of 114 98 #3 of 114 49 #91 of 179
Shareholder Returns 87 #11 of 77 18 #63 of 77 59 #40 of 97
Overall 30 54 62
  • CPNG ranked among 116 companies in Retail
  • RVLV ranked among 116 companies in Retail
  • UBER ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPNGRVLVUBERSPY
1 month +13.9%-10.2%-0.4% -5.9%
3 months +0.5%-22.9%-2.4% -4.6%
6 months -4.5%-5.9%-10.3% +0.2%
Year to date -30.3%-36.9%-15.8% +7.5%
1 year -45.6%-14.2%-25.8% +8.2%
3 years -1.6%+42.8%+42.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year -0.5%+12.6%+12.6% +19.0%
5 years -45.1%-76.6%+45.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -11.3%-25.3%+7.8% +9.4%

Risk

MeasureCPNGRVLVUBERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.5%49.0%35.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.7%50.9%34.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.930.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-0.29-0.73 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.1%-85.7%-55.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.6%-39.5%-26.9% -5.9%
52-week high $30.22$31.45$94.10 $779.14
52-week low $13.75$17.51$65.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPNGRVLVUBER
P/E now vs peer median -21.7xmedian 18.8x 20.5xmedian 18.8x 40.5xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.5x 2.5xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -38.3xmedian 9.0x 12.8xmedian 9.0x 18.6xmedian 15.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -71.3xmedian 15.3x -186.2xmedian 15.3x 13.5xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 1.8x 2.4xmedian 1.8x 4.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 0.87 0.74median 0.87 0.81median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPNGRVLVUBER
Revenue $36.16B $1.37B $56.53B
Gross profit $9.90B $742.00M $24.42B
Operating income -$1.24B $77.37M $7.03B
Net income -$1.36B $66.46M $3.58B
Free cash flow -$412.00M -$7.27M $10.42B
R&D – – $4.15B
EPS (diluted) $-0.76 $0.92 $1.69
Cash & equivalents $5.44B $284.64M $9.56B
Total debt $1.64B – $15.66B
Shares (diluted) 1.80B 71.86M 2.05B
Enterprise value $4.90B $109.77M $111.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPNGRVLVUBER
P/E -21.7x 20.5x 40.5x
P/FCF -71.3x -186.2x 13.5x
P/Operating cash flow 34.8x 202.5x 13.1x
P/S 0.8x 1.0x 2.5x
P/B 10.4x 2.4x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 11.0x 2.4x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA -38.3x 12.8x 18.6x
EV/EBIT -20.6x 13.8x 20.7x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.8x 2.6x
EV/FCF -62.1x -147.1x 14.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.3x 159.9x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 0.74 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPNGRVLVUBER
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.4% 14.7% 13.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.0% 8.6% 16.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.9% 16.5% 23.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 10.3% 19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -259.6% 18.9% 54.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -69.9% 36.2% 181.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -449.5% 22.2% -78.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -73.0% 26.9% 50.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -462.9% 19.0% -78.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -73.2% 27.6% 50.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -64.3% -90.9% 19.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.4% -43.1% 62.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -132.6% -111.5% 20.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.5% -30.6% 65.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPNGRVLVUBER
Gross margin 27.4% 54.1% 43.2%
EBITDA margin -1.8% 6.1% 13.9%
Operating margin -3.4% 5.6% 12.4%
Pretax margin -3.5% 6.4% 8.7%
Net margin -3.8% 4.8% 6.1%
FCF margin -1.1% -0.5% 18.4%
Operating cash flow margin 2.3% 0.5% 19.0%
Return on equity -46.8% 12.1% 12.6%
Return on assets -7.6% 7.8% 5.2%
Return on invested capital -24.6% – 12.4%
Return on capital employed -19.1% 13.3% 13.0%
Asset turnover 2.0x 1.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.6x 0.1x 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 0.8% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPNGRVLVUBER
Debt / assets 9.0% – 22.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.7x – 0.7x
Debt / FCF -4.0x – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 84.5% 35.3% 59.8%
Equity / assets 15.5% 64.7% 40.2%
Interest coverage -16.3x – 14.0x
Current ratio 0.8x 2.6x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.33 5.82 3.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPNGRVLVUBER
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 4.1% 0.0% 4.4%
Shareholder yield 4.1% 0.0% 4.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPNGRVLVUBER
Forward P/E – 21.6xFY2026 19.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.52FY2026 $0.88FY2026 $3.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -572.7%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026 -26.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +20.5% +20.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $36.34BFY2026 $1.34BFY2026 $61.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.2%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.9% +16.1% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPNGRVLVUBER
Held by institutions 81.8% 62.6% 82.5%
Institutions holding 590 207 2,414
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% -4.8% +1.3%
Institutions buying 262 118 1,186
Institutions selling 245 67 978
Buyers to sellers 1.07 1.76 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPNGRVLVUBER
CPNG 1.00 0.26 0.24
RVLV 0.26 1.00 0.16
UBER 0.24 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPNG, RVLV and UBER?

Uber Technologies (UBER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Coupang (CPNG) $29.07B, Revolve (RVLV) $1.35B, Uber Technologies (UBER) $140.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPNG, RVLV and UBER?

Revolve (RVLV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Coupang (CPNG) -21.3x, Revolve (RVLV) 20.4x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 40.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Uber Technologies (UBER) is cheapest (Revolve (RVLV) 21.6x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 19.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Revolve (RVLV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Coupang (CPNG) +7.4%, Revolve (RVLV) +14.7%, Uber Technologies (UBER) +13.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Uber Technologies (UBER) has the highest net margin (Coupang (CPNG) -3.8%, Revolve (RVLV) 4.8%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 6.1%). On return on invested capital, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads (Coupang (CPNG) -24.6%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 12.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Revolve (RVLV) returned the most: Coupang (CPNG) -45.6%, Revolve (RVLV) -14.2%, Uber Technologies (UBER) -25.8%. Over five years, Uber Technologies (UBER) compounded fastest (Coupang (CPNG) -11.3%/yr, Revolve (RVLV) -25.3%/yr, Uber Technologies (UBER) +7.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Uber Technologies (UBER) has been the steadiest (Coupang (CPNG) 49.5%, Revolve (RVLV) 49.0%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 35.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPNG, RVLV and UBER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.