CPNG vs GRAB vs GCT Stock Comparison

Coupang, Grab Holdings and GigaCloud Technology Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CPNG Coupang, Inc.
$16.44 +13.9% 1M -45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$29.29B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.16B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$3.48 +13.4% 1M -38.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.36B
P/E
21.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.97B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
6 wins
GCT GigaCloud Technology Inc
$63.01 +15.1% 1M +130.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.35B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.47B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Grab Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Grab Holdings 6, GigaCloud Technology 3, Coupang 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPNGGRABGCTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.29B $14.36B $2.35B CPNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -21.5x 21.9x 15.1x GCT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 24.9x 14.6x GCT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.4% +22.9% +22.9% GRAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.8% 16.5% 10.6% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.6% 2.4% — GRAB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.7x -4.4x — GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.6% -38.3% +130.1% GCT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.3%/yr -21.9%/yr — CPNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.5% 40.5% 67.6% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 68/100 57/100 GRAB

Percentile Scorecard

CPNGGRABGCT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPNGGRABGCT
Valuation 7 #101 of 108 47 #88 of 166 12 #95 of 108
Growth 6 #98 of 104 95 #8 of 154 67 #35 of 104
Profitability 17 #86 of 103 53 #73 of 154 73 #29 of 103
Financial Health 36 #73 of 114 75 #46 of 179 90 #12 of 114
Shareholder Returns 87 #11 of 77 – 45 #43 of 77
Overall 30 68 57
  • CPNG ranked among 116 companies in Retail
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GCT ranked among 116 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPNGGRABGCTSPY
1 month +13.9%+13.4%+15.1% -5.9%
3 months +0.5%-5.2%+20.2% -4.6%
6 months -4.5%-8.2%+47.1% +0.2%
Year to date -30.3%-30.3%+60.4% +7.5%
1 year -45.6%-38.3%+130.1% +8.2%
3 years -1.6%+10.8%+507.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year -0.5%+3.5%+82.6% +19.0%
5 years -45.1%-70.8%— +56.5%
5 years, per year -11.3%-21.9%— +9.4%

Risk

MeasureCPNGGRABGCTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.5%40.5%67.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.7%39.1%54.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.391.161.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-0.951.93 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.1%-86.5%-91.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.6%-41.0%0.0% -5.9%
52-week high $30.22$5.90$63.01 $779.14
52-week low $13.75$2.71$25.46 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPNGGRABGCT
P/E now vs peer median -21.7xmedian 18.8x 21.7xmedian 18.0x 14.7xmedian 18.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.5x 3.5xmedian 1.3x 3.1xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -38.3xmedian 9.0x 21.1xmedian 15.5x 23.2xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -71.3xmedian 15.3x 64.2xmedian 11.4x 28.7xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 1.8x 1.9xmedian 1.7x 8.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 0.87 —median 0.38 —median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPNGGRABGCT
Revenue $36.16B $3.97B $1.47B
Gross profit $9.90B $1.20B $351.40M
Operating income -$1.24B $201.00M $170.80M
Net income -$1.36B $526.00M $156.13M
Free cash flow -$412.00M – $157.64M
R&D – $412.00M $10.20M
EPS (diluted) $-0.76 $0.16 $4.27
Cash & equivalents $5.44B $2.85B $334.50M
Total debt $1.64B $452.00M –
Shares (diluted) 1.80B 4.21B 36.55M
Enterprise value $5.12B -$328.55M $831.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPNGGRABGCT
P/E -21.7x 21.7x 14.7x
P/FCF -71.3x 64.2x 28.7x
P/Operating cash flow 34.8x – 26.8x
P/S 0.8x 3.5x 3.1x
P/B 10.4x 1.9x 8.5x
P/Tangible book 11.0x 1.9x 8.6x
EV/EBITDA -38.3x 21.1x 23.2x
EV/EBIT -20.6x 56.8x 24.3x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.9x 2.8x
EV/FCF -62.1x – 26.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.3x – 24.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPNGGRABGCT
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.4% 22.9% 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.0% 21.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.9% 17.0% 24.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 32.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -259.6% 1,240% 28.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -69.9% 31.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -449.5% 806.9% 17.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -73.0% 37.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) -462.9% 974.3% 22.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -73.2% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -64.3% – -1.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -132.6% – -2.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPNGGRABGCT
Gross margin 27.4% 30.1% 24.0%
EBITDA margin -1.8% 13.7% 12.2%
Operating margin -3.4% 5.1% 11.6%
Pretax margin -3.5% 13.2% 12.5%
Net margin -3.8% 16.5% 10.6%
FCF margin -1.1% – 10.7%
Operating cash flow margin 2.3% – 11.5%
Return on equity -46.8% 7.5% 29.9%
Return on assets -7.6% 3.8% 12.5%
Return on invested capital -24.6% 2.4% –
Return on capital employed -19.1% – 18.9%
Asset turnover 2.0x 0.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.6x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 5.9% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPNGGRABGCT
Debt / assets 9.0% 3.2% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.7x -4.4x –
Debt / FCF -4.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 84.5% 48.9% 58.1%
Equity / assets 15.5% 51.1% 41.9%
Interest coverage -16.3x 1.7x 460.4x
Current ratio 0.8x – 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x – 1.1x
Altman Z-score 2.33 – 6.11

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPNGGRABGCT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 4.1% – 1.9%
Shareholder yield 4.1% – 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPNGGRABGCT
Forward P/E – 24.9xFY2026 14.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.52FY2026 $0.14FY2026 $4.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -572.7%FY2026 +133.3%FY2026 +20.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.4% +25.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $36.34BFY2026 $4.10BFY2026 $1.61BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.2%FY2026 +21.7%FY2026 +24.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.9% +33.8% +2.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPNGGRABGCT
Held by institutions 81.8% 75.6% 81.5%
Institutions holding 590 484 220
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% +0.9% +14.0%
Institutions buying 262 231 136
Institutions selling 245 168 62
Buyers to sellers 1.07 1.38 2.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPNGGRABGCT
CPNG 1.00 0.34 0.19
GRAB 0.34 1.00 0.24
GCT 0.19 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPNG, GRAB and GCT?

Coupang (CPNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Coupang (CPNG) $29.29B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $14.36B, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) $2.35B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPNG, GRAB and GCT?

GigaCloud Technology (GCT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Coupang (CPNG) -21.5x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 21.9x, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) 15.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 24.9x, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) 14.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Coupang (CPNG) +7.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +22.9%, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Coupang (CPNG) -3.8%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.5%, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) 10.6%). On return on invested capital, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads (Coupang (CPNG) -24.6%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 2.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GigaCloud Technology (GCT) returned the most: Coupang (CPNG) -45.6%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -38.3%, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) +130.1%. Over five years, Coupang (CPNG) compounded fastest (Coupang (CPNG) -11.3%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -21.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Coupang (CPNG) 49.5%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 40.5%, GigaCloud Technology (GCT) 67.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPNG, GRAB and GCT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.