CLBT vs FTNT vs UI Stock Comparison

Cellebrite DI, Fortinet and Ubiquiti Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FFIV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$12.28 +12.4% 1M -29.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.06B
P/E
50.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$139.10 -20.9% 1M +65.2% 1Y
Market cap
$102.04B
P/E
44.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$606.97 +8.3% 1M -21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$36.74B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
0.56%
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ubiquiti leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ubiquiti 5, Fortinet 4, Cellebrite DI 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLBTFTNTUILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.06B $102.04B $36.74B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.5x 44.7x 38.2x UI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.5x 38.9x 32.1x UI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% +20.2% +27.2% UI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% — 29.3% UI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% — 72.8% UI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.56% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.4% +65.2% -21.5% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.9%/yr +15.6%/yr +14.7%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.7% 48.8% 53.7% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 55/100 68/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

CLBTFTNTUI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLBTFTNTUI
Valuation 79 #27 of 124 42 #73 of 124 27 #82 of 112
Growth 78 #26 of 113 67 #38 of 113 88 #14 of 108
Profitability 91 #11 of 109 97 #4 of 109 99 #2 of 104
Financial Health 65 #45 of 127 14 #109 of 127 75 #30 of 116
Shareholder Returns 39 #39 of 63 – 51 #39 of 78
Overall 70 55 68
  • CLBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLBTFTNTUISPY
1 month +12.4%-20.9%+8.3% +0.7%
3 months -15.7%-9.8%+13.9% +3.7%
6 months -5.5%+65.0%-40.0% +7.1%
Year to date -31.9%+75.2%+9.7% +12.8%
1 year -29.4%+65.2%-21.5% +11.9%
3 years +84.7%+147.0%+411.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +22.7%+35.2%+72.4% +22.8%
5 years +9.9%+106.8%+98.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.9%+15.6%+14.7% +10.9%
10 years —+2,087.1%+1,063.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+36.1%+27.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLBTFTNTUISPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.7%48.8%53.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%51.0%59.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.541.041.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.461.33-0.40 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.1%-38.3%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.3%-28.6%-44.0% -1.2%
52-week high $19.28$194.75$1,084.50 $779.14
52-week low $10.44$75.23$515.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLBTFTNTUI
P/E now vs peer median 50.5xmedian 39.0x 44.7xmedian 39.0x 38.2xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 4.6x 12.9xmedian 4.6x 11.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 35.6xmedian 32.7x —median 32.7x 30.0xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 27.4x 41.4xmedian 27.4x 40.4xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 3.2x 45.4xmedian 3.2x 25.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.09median 1.23 1.57median 1.23 1.16median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLBTFTNTUI
Revenue $514.29M $7.88B $3.27B
Gross profit $426.66M – $1.51B
Operating income $55.86M $2.60B $1.19B
Net income $58.76M $2.28B $960.30M
Free cash flow $158.73M – $908.94M
R&D $129.82M $857.40M $204.17M
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $3.08 $15.85
Cash & equivalents $141.25M $3.75B $522.58M
Total debt $71.94M – $180.81M
Shares (diluted) 249.90M 739.90M 60.57M
Enterprise value $1.80B $102.04B $35.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLBTFTNTUI
P/E 50.5x 44.7x 38.2x
P/FCF 19.3x 41.4x 40.4x
P/Operating cash flow 19.4x 27.7x 39.6x
P/S 6.0x 12.9x 11.2x
P/B 5.7x 45.4x 25.5x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 45.4x 25.5x
EV/EBITDA 35.6x – 30.0x
EV/EBIT 50.0x – 30.5x
EV/Revenue 5.4x 12.9x 11.0x
EV/FCF 17.6x – 39.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.7x 27.7x 38.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.09 1.57 1.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLBTFTNTUI
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% 20.2% 27.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 15.1% 19.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.8% – 35.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.9% – 25.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.7% 27.8% 41.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 61.2% 28.9% 29.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 138.9% 21.8% 34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.0% 25.6% 33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 132.6% 25.3% 34.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.2% 28.5% 33.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.2% 50.6% 45.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.9% 17.5% 103.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.9% – 44.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.9% – 95.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLBTFTNTUI
Gross margin 83.0% – 46.2%
EBITDA margin 15.2% – 36.8%
Operating margin 10.9% – 36.2%
Pretax margin 14.7% – 36.1%
Net margin 11.4% – 29.3%
FCF margin 30.9% – 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin 30.6% 46.8% 28.4%
Return on equity 11.2% 120.1% 72.7%
Return on assets 6.0% 20.0% 49.1%
Return on invested capital 7.9% – 72.8%
Return on capital employed 9.2% – 89.1%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x 1.6x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 11.1% 3.9% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLBTFTNTUI
Debt / assets 2.5% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 45.9% 81.2% 34.5%
Equity / assets 54.1% 18.8% 65.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x – 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.8x – 1.0x
Altman Z-score 4.91 – 33.91

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLBTFTNTUI
Dividend yield – – 0.6%
Net buyback yield -0.4% – –
Shareholder yield -0.4% – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLBTFTNTUI
Forward P/E 45.5xFY2026 38.9xFY2026 32.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.27FY2026 $3.58FY2026 $18.88FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -12.9%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026 +18.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +33.3% +0.8% +9.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $593.75MFY2026 $8.38BFY2026 $4.12BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +24.8%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +14.1% +13.2% +5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLBTFTNTUI
Held by institutions 51.4% 68.6% 4.9%
Institutions holding 199 1,568 355
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +23.7% +8.0%
Institutions buying 117 854 163
Institutions selling 60 550 139
Buyers to sellers 1.95 1.55 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLBTFTNTUI
CLBT 1.00 0.28 0.01
FTNT 0.28 1.00 -0.04
UI 0.01 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLBT, FTNT and UI?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $3.06B, Fortinet (FTNT) $102.04B, Ubiquiti (UI) $36.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLBT, FTNT and UI?

Ubiquiti (UI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 50.5x, Fortinet (FTNT) 44.7x, Ubiquiti (UI) 38.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ubiquiti (UI) is cheapest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 45.5x, Fortinet (FTNT) 38.9x, Ubiquiti (UI) 32.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ubiquiti (UI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%, Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ubiquiti (UI) has the highest net margin (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%). On return on invested capital, Ubiquiti (UI) leads (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 7.9%, Ubiquiti (UI) 72.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -29.4%, Fortinet (FTNT) +65.2%, Ubiquiti (UI) -21.5%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +1.9%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +15.6%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ubiquiti (UI) 0.56%. Cellebrite DI (CLBT) and Fortinet (FTNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 63.7%, Fortinet (FTNT) 48.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) 53.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLBT, FTNT and UI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ubiquiti (UI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.