CLBT vs PANW Stock Comparison

Cellebrite DI and Palo Alto Networks Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$12.23 +13.3% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.89B
P/E
49.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$390.46 +4.2% 1M +79.8% 1Y
Market cap
$301.59B
P/E
982.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Palo Alto Networks leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Palo Alto Networks 5, Cellebrite DI 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLBTPANWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.89B $301.59B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 49.1x 982.4x CLBT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.3x 89.4x CLBT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% +24.5% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 2.7% CLBT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.5% +79.8% PANW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr +36.6%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.0% 49.6% PANW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 49/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

CLBTPANW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLBTPANW
Valuation 78 #28 of 124 42 #72 of 124
Growth 78 #26 of 113 37 #72 of 113
Profitability 91 #11 of 110 76 #27 of 110
Financial Health 67 #43 of 129 38 #81 of 129
Shareholder Returns 38 #42 of 67 52 #33 of 67
Overall 70 49
  • CLBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLBTPANWSPY
1 month +13.3%+4.2% -0.8%
3 months -16.5%+23.0% +3.5%
6 months -3.4%+113.5% +7.0%
Year to date -32.2%+112.0% +12.2%
1 year -34.5%+79.8% +13.0%
3 years +89.6%+227.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +23.8%+48.5% +23.1%
5 years +12.5%+375.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.4%+36.6% +11.0%
10 years —+1,447.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+31.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCLBTPANWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.0%49.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.7%46.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.561.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.541.61 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.1%-36.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.6%-7.0% -1.8%
52-week high $19.28$419.91 $779.14
52-week low $10.44$141.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLBTPANW
P/E now vs peer median 50.3xmedian 38.1x 952.6xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 4.3x 27.7xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 35.4x 147.3xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 27.1x 77.4xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 3.4x 11.6xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.09median 1.27 -65.83median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLBTPANW
Revenue $514.29M $11.48B
Gross profit $426.66M $8.08B
Operating income $55.86M $695.00M
Net income $58.76M $307.00M
Free cash flow $158.73M $4.11B
R&D $129.82M $2.55B
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $0.40
Cash & equivalents $141.25M $2.51B
Total debt $71.94M –
Shares (diluted) 249.90M 764.00M
Enterprise value $1.63B $286.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLBTPANW
P/E 50.3x 952.6x
P/FCF 19.2x 77.4x
P/Operating cash flow 19.4x 69.9x
P/S 5.9x 27.7x
P/B 5.7x 11.6x
P/Tangible book 7.3x 15.5x
EV/EBITDA 35.4x 147.3x
EV/EBIT 49.8x 453.5x
EV/Revenue 5.4x 27.5x
EV/FCF 17.5x 76.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.6x 69.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.09 -65.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLBTPANW
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 18.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.8% 19.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.9% 17.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.7% -44.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 61.2% 21.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 138.9% -72.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.0% -11.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 132.6% -74.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.2% -14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.2% 22.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.9% 17.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.9% 18.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.9% 16.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLBTPANW
Gross margin 83.0% 70.4%
EBITDA margin 15.2% 18.6%
Operating margin 10.9% 6.1%
Pretax margin 14.7% 4.7%
Net margin 11.4% 2.7%
FCF margin 30.9% 35.8%
Operating cash flow margin 30.6% 39.7%
Return on equity 11.2% 1.1%
Return on assets 6.0% 0.6%
Return on invested capital 7.9% –
Return on capital employed 9.2% 1.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x 14.8x
Stock comp / revenue 11.1% 15.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLBTPANW
Debt / assets 2.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 45.9% 43.3%
Equity / assets 54.1% 56.7%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 1.6x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.89 9.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLBTPANW
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% -0.1%
Shareholder yield -0.4% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLBTPANW
Forward P/E 45.3xFY2026 89.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.27FY2026 $4.37FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -12.9%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +33.3% +16.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $593.75MFY2026 $13.37BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +24.8%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +14.1% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLBTPANW
Held by institutions 51.4% 82.1%
Institutions holding 199 2,912
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +6.6%
Institutions buying 117 1,545
Institutions selling 60 1,125
Buyers to sellers 1.95 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLBTPANW
CLBT 1.00 0.35
PANW 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLBT and PANW?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $2.89B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $301.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLBT and PANW?

Cellebrite DI (CLBT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 49.1x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 982.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) is cheapest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 45.3x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 89.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cellebrite DI (CLBT) has the highest net margin (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Palo Alto Networks (PANW) returned the most: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -34.5%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +79.8%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +2.4%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) has been the steadiest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 64.0%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 49.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CLBT and PANW move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.35, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CLBT and PANW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.