CHRW vs FLX vs GRAB Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, BingEx and Grab Holdings Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RBA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLX BingEx Ltd
$1.53 +8.5% 1M -61.2% 1Y
Market cap
$111.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$558.59M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.86 -7.1% 1M -52.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.35B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Grab Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Grab Holdings 5, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 4, BingEx 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWFLXGRABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.07B $111.89M $11.35B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.8x -57.5x 17.9x GRAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.0x 3.6x 17.9x FLX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% -3.8% +21.5% GRAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% -0.3% 17.6% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.3% — 1.5% CHRW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x — -4.9x GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.96% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.4% -61.2% -52.4% CHRW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.4%/yr — -24.5%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.1% 99.0% 39.0% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 58/100 56/100 FLX

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWFLXGRAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWFLXGRAB
Valuation 25 #103 of 137 66 #47 of 137 44 #93 of 165
Growth 42 #73 of 124 54 #58 of 124 82 #29 of 153
Profitability 49 #63 of 122 25 #92 of 122 49 #78 of 153
Financial Health 40 #88 of 147 88 #18 of 147 51 #89 of 179
Shareholder Returns 61 #34 of 85 – –
Overall 43 58 56
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FLX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWFLXGRABSPY
1 month -18.4%+8.5%-7.1% -2.3%
3 months -12.4%-30.5%-22.1% -0.7%
6 months -20.2%-42.9%-21.0% +4.8%
Year to date -19.9%-51.9%-42.7% +10.3%
1 year -16.4%-61.2%-52.4% +10.3%
3 years +57.6%—-9.5% +73.0%
3 years, per year +16.4%—-3.3% +20.1%
5 years +36.2%—-75.5% +61.9%
5 years, per year +6.4%—-24.5% +10.1%
10 years +88.0%—— +258.6%
10 years, per year +6.5%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHRWFLXGRABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.1%99.0%39.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%114.1%39.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.690.941.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.36-0.62-1.35 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-95.6%-86.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.5%-63.2%-52.9% -3.5%
52-week high $209.42$4.16$6.07 $779.14
52-week low $124.61$0.80$2.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWFLXGRAB
P/E now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 16.1x -57.5xmedian 16.1x 17.9xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.2xmedian 0.9x 3.0xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 8.1x —median 8.1x 21.0xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x 58.8xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x 1.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.16median 0.75 —median 0.75 —median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWFLXGRAB
Revenue $18.22B $558.59M $3.73B
Gross profit $2.86B $60.56M $1.63B
Operating income $884.59M $5.06M $120.00M
Net income $668.81M -$1.71M $525.00M
Free cash flow $519.78M – $193.00M
R&D – $9.48M $417.00M
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $-0.03 $0.16
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $84.66M $2.86B
Total debt $1.87B – $2.03B
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 69.52M 4.21B
Enterprise value $14.41B -$272.28M -$3.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGRAB
P/E 22.8x -57.5x 17.9x
P/FCF 29.0x – 58.8x
P/Operating cash flow 28.2x – 87.3x
P/S 0.8x 0.2x 3.0x
P/B 9.5x 1.0x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 9.8x 1.0x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 17.1x – 21.0x
EV/EBIT 18.9x -2.7x 76.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.0x 2.5x
EV/FCF 32.2x – 47.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.4x – 70.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.16 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGRAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% -3.8% 21.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% – 23.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.9% -10.0% 23.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – 69.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 149.3% 340.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% – 28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 94.4% 837.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% – 35.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 96.5% 1,011%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% – -82.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% – 34.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -39.4% – -76.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% – 40.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGRAB
Gross margin 15.7% 10.8% 43.6%
EBITDA margin 5.4% – 11.8%
Operating margin 4.9% 0.9% 3.2%
Pretax margin 4.5% -0.3% 13.9%
Net margin 3.7% -0.3% 17.6%
FCF margin 2.9% – 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% – 3.5%
Return on equity 41.7% -1.5% 7.9%
Return on assets 10.9% -1.0% 4.2%
Return on invested capital 21.3% – 1.5%
Return on capital employed 29.2% 4.5% 1.7%
Asset turnover 3.0x 3.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 6.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGRAB
Debt / assets 29.3% – 15.1%
Debt / equity 1.2x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x – -4.9x
Debt / FCF 3.6x – 10.5x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 35.0% 49.7%
Equity / assets 24.7% 65.0% 50.3%
Interest coverage – – 1.1x
Current ratio 1.3x 2.4x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.3x 2.3x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 2.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 6.78 – -0.22

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGRAB
Dividend yield 2.0% – –
Net buyback yield 4.3% – –
Shareholder yield 6.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWFLXGRAB
Forward P/E 21.0xFY2026 3.6xFY2026 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 $0.43FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +514.3%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +7.0% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 $648.80MFY2026 $4.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +2.6% +33.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWFLXGRAB
Held by institutions 100.0% – 75.6%
Institutions holding 893 – 484
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% – +0.9%
Institutions buying 446 – 231
Institutions selling 319 – 168
Buyers to sellers 1.40 – 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWFLXGRAB
CHRW 1.00 -0.02 0.09
FLX -0.02 1.00 0.22
GRAB 0.09 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, FLX and GRAB?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $15.07B, BingEx (FLX) $111.89M, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.35B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, FLX and GRAB?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 22.8x, BingEx (FLX) -57.5x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, BingEx (FLX) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.0x, BingEx (FLX) 3.6x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, BingEx (FLX) -3.8%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 3.7%, BingEx (FLX) -0.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.6%). On return on invested capital, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -16.4%, BingEx (FLX) -61.2%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -52.4%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +6.4%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -24.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 1.96%. BingEx (FLX) and Grab Holdings (GRAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 45.1%, BingEx (FLX) 99.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, FLX and GRAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.