CELH vs KDP vs NTR Stock Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Keurig Dr Pepper and Nutrien Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KOF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$30.03 +10.0% 1M -49.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.11B
P/E
35.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.17B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
5 wins
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$36.89 +18.5% 1M +38.1% 1Y
Market cap
$49.85B
P/E
34.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.09B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins
NTR Nutrien Ltd.
$72.19 +1.4% 1M +33.7% 1Y
Market cap
$34.70B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.26B
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celsius Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Celsius Holdings 5, Keurig Dr Pepper 3, Nutrien 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCELHKDPNTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.11B $49.85B $34.70B KDP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.2x 34.9x 16.9x NTR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x 15.6x 14.4x NTR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +49.1% +27.5% +6.2% CELH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.3% 7.1% 7.3% CELH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.5% 4.3% 13.4% CELH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 6.7x 1.3x CELH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -49.9% +38.1% +33.7% KDP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.6%/yr +0.3%/yr +1.5%/yr NTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.2% 26.9% 33.1% KDP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 36/100 65/100 CELH

Percentile Scorecard

CELHKDPNTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCELHKDPNTR
Valuation 56 #17 of 37 50 #19 of 37 88 #12 of 95
Growth 91 #4 of 33 47 #18 of 33 51 #46 of 93
Profitability 63 #13 of 33 56 #15 of 33 75 #23 of 89
Financial Health 73 #11 of 38 14 #33 of 38 78 #22 of 96
Shareholder Returns 52 #12 of 24 13 #21 of 24 35 #49 of 75
Overall 67 36 65
  • CELH ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • KDP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • NTR ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCELHKDPNTRSPY
1 month +10.0%+18.5%+1.4% -5.9%
3 months +26.3%+21.5%+8.2% -4.6%
6 months -12.3%+29.3%+5.6% +0.2%
Year to date -34.3%+31.7%+17.0% +7.5%
1 year -49.9%+38.1%+33.7% +8.2%
3 years -49.1%+19.1%+34.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year -20.2%+6.0%+10.3% +19.0%
5 years -16.6%+1.4%+7.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -3.6%+0.3%+1.5% +9.4%
10 years +4,520.0%-57.4%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +46.7%-8.2%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCELHKDPNTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.2%26.9%33.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.1%25.7%34.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.950.04-0.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.781.421.02 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.9%-36.9%-61.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.9%0.0%-14.0% -5.9%
52-week high $59.92$36.89$83.94 $779.14
52-week low $23.77$25.31$54.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCELHKDPNTR
P/E now vs peer median 33.0xmedian 24.4x 35.2xmedian 24.4x 17.1xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.7x 2.5xmedian 1.7x 1.2xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 15.0x 18.5xmedian 15.0x 5.3xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 21.3x 25.5xmedian 21.3x 5.5xmedian 17.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 2.6x 1.7xmedian 2.6x 1.4xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.42median 1.16 -12.72median 1.16 -9.38median 1.76

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCELHKDPNTR
Revenue $3.17B $20.09B $28.26B
Gross profit $1.51B $9.92B $8.65B
Operating income $412.38M $3.26B $6.45B
Net income $317.09M $1.50B $5.39B
Free cash flow $269.01M $1.97B $6.28B
EPS (diluted) $0.90 $1.05 $4.22
Cash & equivalents $700.62M $1.52B $919.00M
Total debt $667.76M $29.98B $12.81B
Shares (diluted) 254.91M 1.36B 486.52M
Enterprise value $5.83B $45.89B $31.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCELHKDPNTR
P/E 33.0x 35.2x 17.1x
P/FCF 28.1x 25.5x 5.5x
P/Operating cash flow 22.9x 19.9x 8.3x
P/S 2.4x 2.5x 1.2x
P/B 5.9x 1.7x 1.4x
P/Tangible book -76.8x -5.6x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 15.0x 18.5x 5.3x
EV/EBIT 18.3x 24.1x 7.2x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 3.9x 1.7x
EV/FCF 28.0x 39.9x 7.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.8x 31.1x 11.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.42 -12.72 -9.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCELHKDPNTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 49.1% 27.5% 6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 40.3% 11.3% -3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.2% 14.6% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 40.4% 8.9% -3.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 327.3% 22.4% 143.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.2% 10.4% -15.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 392.5% -2.7% 50.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.8% -2.3% 34.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 799.0% -7.2% 35.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.2% -2.8% -1.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -40.4% 19.4% 0.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 65.3% 9.0% -9.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -48.6% 23.0% 1.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.9% 6.4% -9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCELHKDPNTR
Gross margin 47.6% 49.4% 30.6%
EBITDA margin 15.8% 21.2% 31.4%
Operating margin 13.0% 16.2% 22.8%
Pretax margin 12.4% 9.8% 13.2%
Net margin 7.3% 7.1% 7.3%
FCF margin 8.5% 9.8% 22.2%
Operating cash flow margin 10.4% 12.6% 14.8%
Return on equity 25.6% 5.1% 8.6%
Return on assets 6.1% 1.9% 4.2%
Return on invested capital 17.5% 4.3% 13.4%
Return on capital employed 9.8% 5.4% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.7x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.6% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCELHKDPNTR
Debt / assets 13.0% 34.2% 24.3%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.0x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 6.7x 1.3x
Debt / FCF 2.5x 15.2x 2.0x
Liabilities / assets 75.2% 66.6% 51.1%
Equity / assets 24.8% 33.4% 48.9%
Interest coverage 8.7x – 9.1x
Current ratio 2.0x 0.5x –
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.2x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 2.38 0.81 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCELHKDPNTR
Dividend yield – 2.5% 3.0%
Net buyback yield 1.0% -8.8% -2.2%
Shareholder yield 1.0% -6.3% 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCELHKDPNTR
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 15.6xFY2026 14.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.38FY2026 $2.37FY2026 $5.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.0%FY2026 +15.6%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.0% +12.2% +4.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.30BFY2026 $25.26BFY2026 $29.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.9%FY2026 +52.1%FY2026 +13.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +13.6% -11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCELHKDPNTR
Held by institutions 65.3% 100.0% 63.7%
Institutions holding 542 855 728
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% +12.9% -0.5%
Institutions buying 298 470 366
Institutions selling 179 285 237
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.65 1.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CELHKDPNTR
CELH 1.00 0.29 -0.05
KDP 0.29 1.00 0.12
NTR -0.05 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CELH, KDP and NTR?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celsius Holdings (CELH) $8.11B, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) $49.85B, Nutrien (NTR) $34.70B.

Which stock is cheaper, CELH, KDP and NTR?

Nutrien (NTR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 35.2x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 34.9x, Nutrien (NTR) 16.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nutrien (NTR) is cheapest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 21.8x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 15.6x, Nutrien (NTR) 14.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celsius Holdings (CELH) +49.1%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +27.5%, Nutrien (NTR) +6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) has the highest net margin (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 7.3%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 7.1%, Nutrien (NTR) 7.3%). On return on invested capital, Celsius Holdings (CELH) leads (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 17.5%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 4.3%, Nutrien (NTR) 13.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) returned the most: Celsius Holdings (CELH) -49.9%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +38.1%, Nutrien (NTR) +33.7%. Over five years, Nutrien (NTR) compounded fastest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) -3.6%/yr, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +0.3%/yr, Nutrien (NTR) +1.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has been the steadiest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 64.2%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 26.9%, Nutrien (NTR) 33.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CELH, KDP and NTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celsius Holdings (CELH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.