CELH vs COCO vs MNST Stock Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Vita Coco Company and Monster Beverage Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$27.98 -0.1% 1M -54.8% 1Y
Market cap
$7.09B
P/E
118.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.05B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
2 wins
COCO Vita Coco Company, Inc.
$56.37 -2.2% 1M +33.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.22B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$767.53M
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
5 wins
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
$45.66 +9.1% 1M -34.1% 1Y
Market cap
$89.45B
P/E
42.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.22B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Vita Coco Company leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Vita Coco Company 5, Monster Beverage 2, Celsius Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCELHCOCOMNSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.09B $3.22B $89.45B MNST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 118.9x 26.9x 42.0x COCO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.4x 28.8x 38.0x CELH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +82.9% +26.0% +20.4% CELH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.0% 15.7% 23.1% MNST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.8% +33.5% -34.1% COCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.8%/yr +33.1%/yr +1.4%/yr COCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.9% 55.2% 73.6% COCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 72/100 60/100 COCO

Percentile Scorecard

CELHCOCOMNST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCELHCOCOMNST
Valuation 54 #18 of 38 41 #23 of 38 16 #32 of 38
Growth 88 #5 of 33 91 #4 of 33 66 #12 of 33
Profitability 63 #12 of 31 80 #7 of 31 93 #3 of 31
Financial Health 67 #13 of 37 86 #6 of 37 94 #3 of 37
Shareholder Returns 55 #11 of 23 64 #9 of 23 32 #16 of 23
Overall 65 72 60
  • CELH ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • COCO ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • MNST ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCELHCOCOMNSTSPY
1 month -0.1%-2.2%+9.1% +0.9%
3 months -3.1%-16.5%-53.0% +5.9%
6 months -14.3%-15.8%-40.6% +8.5%
Year to date -38.8%+6.3%-40.4% +13.3%
1 year -54.8%+33.5%-34.1% +12.4%
3 years -47.5%+131.4%-8.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year -19.3%+32.3%-2.9% +23.5%
5 years -13.0%+317.6%+7.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year -2.8%+33.1%+1.4% +11.0%
10 years +3,897.1%—+90.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +44.6%—+6.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCELHCOCOMNSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.9%55.2%73.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.6%51.7%106.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.060.730.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.860.61-0.46 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.9%-57.0%-58.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.8%-32.9%-54.3% -0.9%
52-week high $61.90$84.02$99.94 $779.14
52-week low $23.77$39.88$41.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCELHCOCOMNST
P/E now vs peer median 118.9xmedian 26.9x 26.9xmedian 26.9x 42.0xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.7x 4.2xmedian 1.7x 9.7xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.5xmedian 17.9x 19.8xmedian 17.9x 30.6xmedian 17.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 18.5x 22.4xmedian 18.5x 42.6xmedian 18.5x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 2.6x 7.5xmedian 2.6x 9.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 3.53median 2.10 0.57median 2.10 2.51median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCELHCOCOMNST
Revenue $3.05B $767.53M $9.22B
Gross profit $1.49B $314.38M $5.12B
Operating income $160.31M $152.37M $2.69B
Net income $129.12M $120.47M $2.13B
Free cash flow $462.77M $144.02M $2.10B
EPS (diluted) $0.23 $1.98 $1.08
Cash & equivalents $631.23M $152.00M $2.19B
Total debt $667.85M – –
Shares (diluted) 256.93M 60.83M 1.98B
Enterprise value $4.70B $2.40B $77.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCELHCOCOMNST
P/E 118.9x 26.9x 42.0x
P/FCF 15.3x 22.4x 42.6x
P/Operating cash flow 13.9x 21.8x 40.0x
P/S 2.3x 4.2x 9.7x
P/B 5.9x 7.5x 9.6x
P/Tangible book -39.3x 10.0x 11.2x
EV/EBITDA 29.5x 19.8x 30.6x
EV/EBIT 44.4x 20.2x 32.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 4.0x 9.3x
EV/FCF 15.4x 21.3x 41.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.0x 20.8x 38.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.53 0.57 2.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCELHCOCOMNST
Revenue growth (1Y) 82.9% 26.0% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 47.4% 17.0% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 76.4% 43.3% 21.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 51.1% 24.4% 13.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.5% 98.9% 30.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.2% 48.8% 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.0% 74.2% 35.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 46.9% 48.2% 14.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -36.7% 71.5% 34.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.7% 46.9% 16.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 115.8% 155.3% 9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.0% 24.2% 13.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 119.5% 172.0% 13.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.5% 23.4% 15.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCELHCOCOMNST
Gross margin 48.8% 41.0% 55.5%
EBITDA margin 7.9% 20.2% 30.5%
Operating margin 5.3% 19.9% 29.2%
Pretax margin 4.6% 20.2% 30.1%
Net margin 2.0% 15.7% 23.1%
FCF margin 15.2% 18.8% 22.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 19.3% 24.3%
Return on equity 10.5% 29.0% 23.5%
Return on assets 2.5% 19.0% 19.1%
Return on invested capital 7.7% – –
Return on capital employed 3.9% 33.2% 28.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.9x 1.2x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.8% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCELHCOCOMNST
Debt / assets 12.9% – –
Debt / equity 0.6x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x – –
Debt / FCF 1.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 76.8% 38.4% 17.7%
Equity / assets 23.2% 61.6% 82.3%
Interest coverage 3.0x – –
Current ratio 1.8x 2.5x 3.7x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.6x 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.9x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 2.04 10.20 29.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCELHCOCOMNST
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.0% 1.7% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 1.7% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCELHCOCOMNST
Forward P/E 20.4xFY2026 28.8xFY2026 38.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.37FY2026 $1.96FY2026 $1.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +64.7%FY2026 +16.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.2% +16.3% +5.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.30BFY2026 $791.39MFY2026 $10.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.9%FY2026 +29.8%FY2026 +23.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +32.4% +2.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCELHCOCOMNST
Held by institutions 65.3% 86.1% 67.5%
Institutions holding 540 339 1,359
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% -1.5% +2.9%
Institutions buying 296 215 738
Institutions selling 179 94 456
Buyers to sellers 1.65 2.29 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CELHCOCOMNST
CELH 1.00 0.15 0.10
COCO 0.15 1.00 0.08
MNST 0.10 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CELH, COCO and MNST?

Monster Beverage (MNST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celsius Holdings (CELH) $7.09B, Vita Coco Company (COCO) $3.22B, Monster Beverage (MNST) $89.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, CELH, COCO and MNST?

Vita Coco Company (COCO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 118.9x, Vita Coco Company (COCO) 26.9x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 42.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Celsius Holdings (CELH) is cheapest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 20.4x, Vita Coco Company (COCO) 28.8x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 38.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celsius Holdings (CELH) +82.9%, Vita Coco Company (COCO) +26.0%, Monster Beverage (MNST) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Monster Beverage (MNST) has the highest net margin (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 2.0%, Vita Coco Company (COCO) 15.7%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 23.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vita Coco Company (COCO) returned the most: Celsius Holdings (CELH) -54.8%, Vita Coco Company (COCO) +33.5%, Monster Beverage (MNST) -34.1%. Over five years, Vita Coco Company (COCO) compounded fastest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) -2.8%/yr, Vita Coco Company (COCO) +33.1%/yr, Monster Beverage (MNST) +1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vita Coco Company (COCO) has been the steadiest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 63.9%, Vita Coco Company (COCO) 55.2%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 73.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CELH, COCO and MNST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vita Coco Company (COCO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.