CCO vs LAMR vs WPP Stock Comparison

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Lamar Advertising and Wpp Prices as of Oct 15, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAMR Lamar Advertising Co/New
$155.02 +7.7% 1M +29.2% 1Y
Market cap
$13.51B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
4.29%
Billboard REITs Real Estate
7 wins
WPP WPP plc
$26.01 0.0% 1M +7.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
3.84%
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lamar Advertising leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lamar Advertising 7, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings 3, Wpp 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCOLAMRWPPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.23B $13.51B $5.61B LAMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -11.6x 28.3x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 24.6x 7.7x WPP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.1% +4.4% — CCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6.3% 23.9% — LAMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.7% 16.1% — CCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.0x 3.2x — LAMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 4.29% 3.84% LAMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +77.9% +29.2% +7.4% CCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.1%/yr +6.6%/yr -18.5%/yr LAMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.7% 20.9% 55.7% LAMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 58/100 — LAMR

Percentile Scorecard

CCOLAMRWPP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCOLAMRWPP
Valuation 80 #3 of 11 70 #4 of 11 –
Growth 56 #5 of 10 44 #6 of 10 –
Profitability 22 #8 of 10 56 #5 of 10 –
Financial Health 20 #9 of 11 60 #5 of 11 25 #46 of 61
Shareholder Returns – – 56 #12 of 26
Overall 44 58 –
  • CCO ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • LAMR ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • WPP ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCOLAMRWPPSPY
1 month +1.7%+7.7%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +0.4%-4.4%+22.1% +3.9%
6 months +1.3%+14.9%+47.6% +8.2%
Year to date +9.5%+22.5%+15.8% +12.9%
1 year +77.9%+29.2%+7.4% +12.3%
3 years +120.0%+92.9%-38.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +30.1%+24.5%-14.8% +23.3%
5 years -10.0%+37.8%-64.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.1%+6.6%-18.5% +10.9%
10 years -57.9%+147.2%-74.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year -8.3%+9.5%-12.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCCOLAMRWPPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.7%20.9%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.1%20.5%54.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.311.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.181.390.13 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.8%-35.8%-81.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.8%-5.7%-5.6% -1.2%
52-week high $2.44$164.33$27.56 $779.14
52-week low $1.36$116.11$15.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCOLAMRWPP
P/E now vs peer median -11.6xmedian 24.2x 28.3xmedian 24.2x —median 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 6.3x 5.8xmedian 6.3x —median 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 15.7x 15.7xmedian 15.7x —median 10.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 18.2x 18.8xmedian 18.2x —median 9.0x
P/B now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 2.4x 13.6xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 0.72 2.81median 0.72 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCOLAMRWPP
Revenue $1.68B $2.33B –
Gross profit $908.81M $1.57B –
Operating income $316.73M $739.17M –
Net income -$104.29M $565.31M –
Free cash flow $84.25M $718.05M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $5.47 –
Cash & equivalents $192.14M $67.95M $3.13B
Total debt $5.11B $13.78B $26.45B
Shares (diluted) 508.99M 101.59M 215.20M
Enterprise value $518.82M $13.33B -$6.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCOLAMRWPP
P/E -11.6x 28.3x –
P/FCF 14.6x 18.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 7.7x 14.9x –
P/S 0.7x 5.8x –
P/B -0.4x 13.6x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -0.3x -108.8x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 12.5x 15.7x –
EV/EBIT 19.4x 22.9x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 7.3x –
EV/FCF 73.0x 23.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 38.3x 18.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 2.81 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCOLAMRWPP
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.1% 4.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 3.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.0% 5.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 4.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.5% 20.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 8.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -544.8% 28.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -100.0% 10.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -580.3% 26.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -96.3% 10.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 86.4% 4.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.2% 5.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 280.8% -0.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.1% 6.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCOLAMRWPP
Gross margin 54.1% 67.4% –
EBITDA margin 29.4% 46.5% –
Operating margin 18.9% 31.8% –
Pretax margin -7.4% 24.8% –
Net margin -6.3% 23.9% –
FCF margin 5.0% 30.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 39.0% –
Return on equity – 57.2% –
Return on assets -2.7% 8.1% –
Return on invested capital 17.7% 16.1% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% 12.0% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCOLAMRWPP
Debt / assets 135.7% 50.3% 22.7%
Debt / equity -1.5x 3.5x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.0x 3.2x –
Debt / FCF 60.6x 4.9x –
Liabilities / assets 191.9% 85.8% 88.2%
Equity / assets -91.9% 14.2% 11.8%
Interest coverage 0.8x 4.5x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.6x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -1.73 1.75 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCOLAMRWPP
Dividend yield – 4.3% 3.8%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.2% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 117.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 92.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCOLAMRWPP
Forward P/E – 24.6xFY2026 7.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $6.29FY2026 $3.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -250.0%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026 -20.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +2.5% +5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.78BFY2026 $2.48BFY2026 $12.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 -10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.2% +2.5% +9.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCOLAMRWPP
Held by institutions 80.6% 98.1% 11.5%
Institutions holding 196 775 141
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.6% 0.0% -0.4%
Institutions buying 101 426 81
Institutions selling 46 232 35
Buyers to sellers 2.20 1.84 2.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCOLAMRWPP
CCO 1.00 0.14 0.20
LAMR 0.14 1.00 0.19
WPP 0.20 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCO, LAMR and WPP?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) $1.23B, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) $13.51B, Wpp (WPP) $5.61B.

Which company is growing faster?

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) +9.1%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has the highest net margin (Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) -6.3%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 23.9%). On return on invested capital, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) leads (Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 17.7%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 16.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) returned the most: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) +77.9%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +29.2%, Wpp (WPP) +7.4%. Over five years, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) compounded fastest (Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) -2.1%/yr, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +6.6%/yr, Wpp (WPP) -18.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has the highest dividend yield: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 0.00%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 4.29%, Wpp (WPP) 3.84%. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has been the steadiest (Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 35.7%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 20.9%, Wpp (WPP) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCO, LAMR and WPP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.