BMGL vs CON vs LFST Stock Comparison

Basel Medical, Concentra Group Holdings Parent and LifeStance Health Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Concentra Group Holdings Parent leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Concentra Group Holdings Parent 5, LifeStance Health 4, Basel Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMGLCONLFSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.48M $5.16B $5.22B LFST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 26.0x 103.1x CON
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 23.6x 83.7x CON
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +14.0% +20.4% LFST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.7% 3.2% CON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% 3.4% CON
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x 0.2x LFST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +189.3% +96.3% +162.5% BMGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +2.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 287.2% 27.9% 50.5% CON
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 60/100 70/100 LFST

Percentile Scorecard

BMGLCONLFST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMGLCONLFST
Valuation – 60 #37 of 92 51 #46 of 92
Growth – 65 #31 of 87 90 #10 of 87
Profitability – 89 #10 of 86 59 #36 of 86
Financial Health 33 #65 of 97 26 #72 of 97 76 #24 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 57 #24 of 55 74 #15 of 55
Overall – 60 70
  • BMGL ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • CON ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • LFST ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMGLCONLFSTSPY
1 month +32.6%+14.8%+13.1% +0.9%
3 months -23.1%+28.5%+23.3% +5.9%
6 months +721.4%+81.3%+80.2% +8.5%
Year to date +838.8%+106.3%+90.2% +13.3%
1 year +189.3%+96.3%+162.5% +12.4%
3 years ——+137.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year ——+33.5% +23.5%
5 years ——+11.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year ——+2.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBMGLCONLFSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 287.2%27.9%50.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 136.4%23.2%41.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.570.420.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.663.463.22 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.9%-23.5%-71.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.9%0.0%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $8.35$40.59$13.39 $779.14
52-week low $0.49$18.71$4.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMGLCONLFST
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.6x 25.6xmedian 25.6x 101.5xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.6x 3.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.3x 14.4xmedian 16.3x 38.4xmedian 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.3x 19.4xmedian 21.3x 29.4xmedian 21.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 3.3x 10.7xmedian 3.3x 3.5xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.68 —median 0.68 3.19median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMGLCONLFST
Revenue – $2.29B $1.58B
Gross profit – $670.56M $531.85M
Operating income – $374.81M $78.43M
Net income – $203.80M $50.60M
Free cash flow – $267.42M $173.91M
EPS (diluted) – $1.56 $0.13
Cash & equivalents $1.04M $158.04M $225.94M
Total debt $21.78M $1.57B $258.99M
Shares (diluted) 1.57M 127.79M 387.30M
Enterprise value $7.48M $4.81B $4.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMGLCONLFST
P/E – 25.6x 101.5x
P/FCF – 19.4x 29.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 15.4x 23.5x
P/S – 2.3x 3.2x
P/B 1.4x 10.7x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 20.5x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA – 14.4x 38.4x
EV/EBIT – 17.6x 65.6x
EV/Revenue – 2.9x 3.2x
EV/FCF – 24.6x 29.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 19.6x 23.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 3.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMGLCONLFST
Revenue growth (1Y) – 14.0% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 18.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 18.9% 24.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 18.9% 32,780%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 35.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 32.6% 413.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 32.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 33.5% 412.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 31.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 29.2% 48.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 87.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 43.1% 44.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 158.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMGLCONLFST
Gross margin – 29.3% 33.6%
EBITDA margin – 20.0% 8.5%
Operating margin – 16.4% 4.9%
Pretax margin – 11.7% 4.2%
Net margin – 8.7% 3.2%
FCF margin – 11.7% 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin – 14.7% 13.7%
Return on equity – 44.8% 3.4%
Return on assets – 7.0% 2.3%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% 3.4%
Return on capital employed – 14.5% 4.2%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x 4.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 4.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMGLCONLFST
Debt / assets 49.2% 52.3% 11.9%
Debt / equity 1.5x 3.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x 0.2x
Debt / FCF – 5.9x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 67.7% 83.9% 32.3%
Equity / assets 32.3% 16.1% 67.7%
Interest coverage – – 7.8x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.7x 1.2x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – 2.57 4.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMGLCONLFST
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield – 0.5% 1.9%
Shareholder yield – 1.1% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 15.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 12.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 33.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMGLCONLFST
Forward P/E – 23.6xFY2026 83.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.72FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +25.5%FY2026 +700.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.5% +50.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.30BFY2026 $1.82BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.3%FY2026 +28.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.1% +11.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMGLCONLFST
Held by institutions – 87.3% 97.9%
Institutions holding – 291 286
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.0% +1.9%
Institutions buying – 166 204
Institutions selling – 81 55
Buyers to sellers – 2.05 3.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMGLCONLFST
BMGL 1.00 0.04 0.11
CON 0.04 1.00 0.20
LFST 0.11 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMGL, CON and LFST?

LifeStance Health (LFST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Basel Medical (BMGL) $7.48M, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) $5.16B, LifeStance Health (LFST) $5.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, BMGL, CON and LFST?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 26.0x, LifeStance Health (LFST) 103.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) is cheapest (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 23.6x, LifeStance Health (LFST) 83.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

LifeStance Health (LFST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +14.0%, LifeStance Health (LFST) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) has the highest net margin (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 8.7%, LifeStance Health (LFST) 3.2%). On return on invested capital, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 14.2%, LifeStance Health (LFST) 3.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Basel Medical (BMGL) returned the most: Basel Medical (BMGL) +189.3%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +96.3%, LifeStance Health (LFST) +162.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Basel Medical (BMGL) 0.00%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 0.01%, LifeStance Health (LFST) 0.00%. Basel Medical (BMGL) and LifeStance Health (LFST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) has been the steadiest (Basel Medical (BMGL) 287.2%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 27.9%, LifeStance Health (LFST) 50.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BMGL, CON and LFST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.