BMGL vs RDNT Stock Comparison

Basel Medical and RadNet Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RDNT RadNet, Inc.
$73.54 +3.9% 1M -9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.78B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.27B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

RadNet leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (RadNet 2, Basel Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMGLRDNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.25M $5.78B RDNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -270.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 138.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.9% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -0.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +196.8% -9.9% BMGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +18.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 287.2% 42.3% RDNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BMGLRDNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMGLRDNT
Valuation – 40 #56 of 92
Growth – 22 #68 of 87
Profitability – 47 #46 of 86
Financial Health 34 #64 of 97 43 #56 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 44 #32 of 56
Overall – 39
  • BMGL ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • RDNT ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMGLRDNTSPY
1 month +25.1%+3.9% -0.2%
3 months -27.3%+16.3% +3.9%
6 months +646.8%+27.0% +8.2%
Year to date +844.9%+3.1% +12.9%
1 year +196.8%-9.9% +12.3%
3 years —+189.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+42.5% +23.3%
5 years —+137.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+18.9% +10.9%
10 years —+950.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+26.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBMGLRDNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 287.2%42.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 137.0%42.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.571.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.69-0.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.9%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.6%-12.9% -1.2%
52-week high $8.35$84.48 $779.14
52-week low $0.49$51.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMGLRDNT
P/E now vs peer median —median 24.6x -270.9xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 2.5xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.6x 26.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.6x -16.8xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 3.2x 4.1xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 33.09median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMGLRDNT
Revenue – $2.27B
Gross profit – $261.62M
Operating income – $70.78M
Net income – $80.00K
Free cash flow – -$344.77M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $1.04M $726.27M
Total debt $21.78M $1.33B
Shares (diluted) 1.57M 78.73M
Enterprise value $6.45M $3.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMGLRDNT
P/E – -270.9x
P/FCF – -16.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 18.7x
P/S – 2.5x
P/B 1.4x 4.1x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA – 26.2x
EV/EBIT – 90.3x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x
EV/FCF – -18.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 20.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 33.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMGLRDNT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 14.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 17.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 8.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 5.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – -99.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -74.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – -35.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 18.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1,140%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -66.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMGLRDNT
Gross margin – 11.5%
EBITDA margin – 10.7%
Operating margin – 3.1%
Pretax margin – 1.5%
Net margin – -0.9%
FCF margin – -15.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 13.7%
Return on equity – 1.4%
Return on assets – 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 1.5%
Return on capital employed – 2.1%
Asset turnover – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3,876x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMGLRDNT
Debt / assets 49.2% 31.5%
Debt / equity 1.5x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x
Debt / FCF – -3.9x
Liabilities / assets 67.7% 67.0%
Equity / assets 32.3% 33.0%
Interest coverage – 1.0x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.7x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 1.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMGLRDNT
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – -0.1%
Shareholder yield – -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMGLRDNT
Forward P/E – 138.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +35.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +71.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.68BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +31.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMGLRDNT
Held by institutions – 100.0%
Institutions holding – 328
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.0%
Institutions buying – 175
Institutions selling – 110
Buyers to sellers – 1.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMGLRDNT
BMGL 1.00 0.04
RDNT 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMGL and RDNT?

RadNet (RDNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Basel Medical (BMGL) $7.25M, RadNet (RDNT) $5.78B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Basel Medical (BMGL) returned the most: Basel Medical (BMGL) +196.8%, RadNet (RDNT) -9.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, RadNet (RDNT) has been the steadiest (Basel Medical (BMGL) 287.2%, RadNet (RDNT) 42.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BMGL and RDNT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.04, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BMGL and RDNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RadNet (RDNT) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.