BMA vs BSAC vs CFG Stock Comparison

Macro Bank, Banco Santander Chile and Citizens Financial Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EWBC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BMA Macro Bank Inc.
$61.19 -7.3% 1M -28.4% 1Y
Market cap
$7.49B
P/E
39.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.46 -6.3% 1M +11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.01B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 3, Banco Santander Chile 3, Macro Bank 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMABSACCFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.49B $15.01B $27.26B CFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.2x 0.0x 12.8x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.2x 11.1x 12.1x BMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +10.6% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 23.8% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 12.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.0x 2.6x BSAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.4% +11.2% +30.4% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.2%/yr +12.2%/yr +6.8%/yr BMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.5% 28.9% 25.1% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 34/100 30/100 BSAC

Percentile Scorecard

BMABSACCFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMABSACCFG
Valuation 21 #286 of 361 11 #321 of 361 21 #287 of 361
Growth – 22 #120 of 153 21 #121 of 153
Profitability – – 28 #93 of 128
Financial Health – 9 #127 of 140 30 #99 of 140
Shareholder Returns 99 #6 of 335 93 #24 of 335 49 #172 of 335
Overall – 34 30
  • BMA ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMABSACCFGSPY
1 month -7.3%-6.3%+2.9% +0.7%
3 months -35.4%-10.2%-8.3% +3.7%
6 months -15.0%-1.6%+1.1% +7.1%
Year to date -32.1%+1.1%+12.6% +12.8%
1 year -28.4%+11.2%+30.4% +11.9%
3 years +239.2%+81.1%+181.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +50.3%+21.9%+41.2% +22.8%
5 years +289.0%+77.5%+38.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +31.2%+12.2%+6.8% +10.9%
10 years -20.0%+41.3%+149.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year -2.2%+3.5%+9.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBMABSACCFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.5%28.9%25.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.1%30.4%25.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.831.090.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.560.391.21 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.1%-40.5%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.6%-16.0%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $104.70$37.46$74.73 $779.14
52-week low $60.25$28.30$49.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMABSACCFG
P/E now vs peer median 39.2xmedian 12.2x 0.0xmedian 12.2x 13.0xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 0.0xmedian 5.3x 6.6xmedian 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 10.8x -480.8xmedian 10.8x 25.3xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.00median 1.34 2.03median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMABSACCFG
Revenue – – $8.93B
Operating income – $278.26B –
Net income – -$1.70T $2.27B
Free cash flow – – $1.09B
EPS (diluted) – $1,126.89 $4.99
Cash & equivalents $2.10B $2.20B –
Total debt – $47.85B $17.83B
Shares (diluted) 1.27B 471.12M 425.66M
Enterprise value -$413.56M -$10.98T $27.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMABSACCFG
P/E 39.2x 0.0x 13.0x
P/FCF 19.4x -480.8x 25.3x
P/Operating cash flow – – 22.0x
P/S 1.9x 2.8x 3.1x
P/B 1.4x 2.4x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.4x -0.2x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 0.0x 6.6x
EV/EBIT – 0.2x 7.0x
EV/Revenue – – 5.1x
EV/FCF – – 41.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 36.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.00 2.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMABSACCFG
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 10.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -85.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -229.4% 33.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -114.2% 3.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -18.5% 38.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 48.4% 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -55.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -30.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -59.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -32.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMABSACCFG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 77.7%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – 32.3%
Net margin – – 23.8%
FCF margin – – 12.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – 14.1%
Return on equity – – 8.8%
Return on assets – 2,022% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – – 12.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMABSACCFG
Debt / assets – 63.2% 7.6%
Debt / equity – 7.7x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.0x 2.6x
Debt / FCF – – 16.3x
Liabilities / assets 77.5% 91.8% 89.3%
Equity / assets 22.5% 8.2% 10.7%
Interest coverage – – 1.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMABSACCFG
Dividend yield 6.3% 4.7% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – 4.2%
Shareholder yield 6.3% 4.7% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 35.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 72.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -1.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMABSACCFG
Forward P/E 7.2xFY2026 11.1xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.46FY2026 $2.84FY2026 $5.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +159.5%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +50.5% +2.5% +27.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.93BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.0%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.8% +19.1% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMABSACCFG
Held by institutions 9.3% 4.7% 96.7%
Institutions holding 94 157 1,098
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +1.7% +2.9%
Institutions buying 51 82 634
Institutions selling 27 51 314
Buyers to sellers 1.89 1.61 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMABSACCFG
BMA 1.00 0.51 0.34
BSAC 0.51 1.00 0.39
CFG 0.34 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMA, BSAC and CFG?

Citizens Financial (CFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Macro Bank (BMA) $7.49B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $15.01B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, BMA, BSAC and CFG?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Macro Bank (BMA) 39.2x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Macro Bank (BMA) is cheapest (Macro Bank (BMA) 7.2x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.1x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Macro Bank (BMA) -28.4%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.2%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +30.4%. Over five years, Macro Bank (BMA) compounded fastest (Macro Bank (BMA) +31.2%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.2%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Macro Bank (BMA) 0.00%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.00%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%. Macro Bank (BMA) and Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (Macro Bank (BMA) 50.5%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BMA, BSAC and CFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.