BFH vs HTT vs CACC Stock Comparison

Bread Financial Holdings, High Templar Tech and Credit Acceptance Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SYF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.93 -19.6% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$794.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
CACC Credit Acceptance Corp
$542.52 -2.4% 1M +7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.73B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bread Financial Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Bread Financial Holdings 8, Credit Acceptance 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBFHHTTCACCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.17B $794.37M $5.73B CACC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.4x — 11.4x BFH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.4x — 11.8x BFH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% — +2.6% BFH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.3% — 21.5% CACC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.2% — 10.7% BFH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x — 5.6x BFH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.8% -60.1% +7.8% BFH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.3%/yr +2.7%/yr -2.1%/yr BFH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.8% 56.8% 37.6% CACC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 — 64/100 BFH

Percentile Scorecard

BFHHTTCACC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBFHHTTCACC
Valuation 96 #7 of 169 – 58 #71 of 169
Growth 67 #53 of 160 – 56 #71 of 160
Profitability 85 #23 of 149 – 93 #12 of 149
Financial Health 73 #43 of 158 93 #12 of 158 33 #107 of 158
Shareholder Returns 85 #21 of 136 – 82 #26 of 136
Overall 81 – 64
  • BFH ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • CACC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBFHHTTCACCSPY
1 month -0.3%-19.6%-2.4% -0.2%
3 months -4.8%-20.9%-2.9% +3.9%
6 months +18.9%-20.2%+5.0% +8.2%
Year to date +38.6%-45.6%+22.3% +12.9%
1 year +54.8%-60.1%+7.8% +12.3%
3 years +283.3%+7.2%+34.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +56.5%+2.4%+10.3% +23.3%
5 years +48.8%+14.2%-10.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.3%+2.7%-2.1% +10.9%
10 years -36.5%—+196.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year -4.4%—+11.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBFHHTTCACCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.8%56.8%37.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.6%59.8%39.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.181.161.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.38-1.060.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.4%-64.4%-45.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.5%-61.0%-17.4% -1.2%
52-week high $113.40$4.95$657.20 $779.14
52-week low $59.98$1.90$411.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBFHHTTCACC
P/E now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 11.1x —median 11.1x 11.3xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 2.4xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 13.5x —median 13.5x 10.6xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x 4.6xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.63median 0.32 —median 0.32 0.51median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBFHHTTCACC
Revenue $3.96B – $2.33B
Gross profit – – $2.26B
Operating income – – $1.10B
Net income $569.00M – $501.90M
Free cash flow $2.19B – $1.22B
EPS (diluted) $13.88 – $46.76
Cash & equivalents $3.68B $561.74M $1.40M
Total debt $2.45B $879.65M $6.29B
Shares (diluted) 40.70M 500.73M 10.73M
Enterprise value -$10.52B -$2.24B $5.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBFHHTTCACC
P/E 7.2x – 11.3x
P/FCF 1.8x – 4.6x
P/Operating cash flow 1.8x – 4.6x
P/S 1.0x – 2.4x
P/B 1.2x 0.5x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 0.5x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 1.7x – 10.6x
EV/EBIT 1.8x – 10.9x
EV/Revenue 0.7x – 5.1x
EV/FCF 1.2x – 9.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.2x – 9.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.63 – 0.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBFHHTTCACC
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% – 2.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% – 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 2.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 8.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 19.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.0% – 18.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.2% – 14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 129.1% – 29.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.6% – 22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.3% – 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% – 0.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.3% – 10.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – 0.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBFHHTTCACC
Gross margin – – 97.0%
EBITDA margin 39.7% – 48.1%
Operating margin – – 47.0%
Pretax margin 17.3% – 27.9%
Net margin 14.3% – 21.5%
FCF margin 55.4% – 52.4%
Operating cash flow margin 55.4% – 52.6%
Return on equity 17.0% – 32.3%
Return on assets 2.5% – 5.8%
Return on invested capital 20.2% – 10.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.9x – 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBFHHTTCACC
Debt / assets 10.9% 16.0% 72.9%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.2x 4.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x – 5.6x
Debt / FCF 1.1x – 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 85.0% 21.2% 81.6%
Equity / assets 15.0% 78.8% 18.4%
Interest coverage 1.9x – 2.5x
Current ratio – 4.8x –
Quick ratio – 2.4x –
Cash ratio – 2.4x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBFHHTTCACC
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield 14.1% – 9.1%
Shareholder yield 15.0% – 9.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 7.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 2.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBFHHTTCACC
Forward P/E 8.4xFY2026 – 11.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.23FY2026 $-0.04FY2024 $45.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024 +16.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.8% – +20.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.93BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024 $2.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.2% – +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBFHHTTCACC
Held by institutions 98.3% 2.2% 72.5%
Institutions holding 421 42 298
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.5% -26.1% +11.5%
Institutions buying 205 14 174
Institutions selling 155 21 88
Buyers to sellers 1.32 0.67 1.98

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BFHHTTCACC
BFH 1.00 0.10 0.37
HTT 0.10 1.00 0.13
CACC 0.37 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BFH, HTT and CACC?

Credit Acceptance (CACC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) $4.17B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $794.37M, Credit Acceptance (CACC) $5.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, BFH, HTT and CACC?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 7.4x, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) is cheapest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 8.4x, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +3.9%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) +2.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Credit Acceptance (CACC) has the highest net margin (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 14.3%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 21.5%). On return on invested capital, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 20.2%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) returned the most: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +54.8%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -60.1%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) +7.8%. Over five years, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) compounded fastest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +8.3%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +2.7%/yr, Credit Acceptance (CACC) -2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 0.01%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 0.00%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 0.00%. High Templar Tech (HTT) and Credit Acceptance (CACC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Credit Acceptance (CACC) has been the steadiest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 39.8%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.8%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 37.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BFH, HTT and CACC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.