BFH vs ENVA vs HTT Stock Comparison

Bread Financial Holdings, Enova International and High Templar Tech Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CACC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ENVA Enova International, Inc.
$164.93 -2.1% 1M +44.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.24B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.99 -18.4% 1M -55.0% 1Y
Market cap
$824.60M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bread Financial Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Bread Financial Holdings 7, Enova International 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBFHENVAHTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.06B $4.24B $824.60M ENVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.2x 11.1x — BFH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.7x 10.0x — BFH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +20.1% — ENVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.3% 10.5% — BFH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.2% 22.1% — ENVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 1.6x — BFH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +52.6% +44.6% -55.0% BFH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.2%/yr +36.5%/yr +1.6%/yr ENVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.8% 46.6% 57.4% BFH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 82/100 77/100 — BFH

Percentile Scorecard

BFHENVAHTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBFHENVAHTT
Valuation 96 #7 of 170 88 #21 of 170 –
Growth 67 #56 of 165 79 #36 of 165 –
Profitability 88 #20 of 155 91 #15 of 155 –
Financial Health 75 #42 of 163 69 #51 of 163 93 #12 of 163
Shareholder Returns 84 #23 of 137 60 #56 of 137 –
Overall 82 77 –
  • BFH ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ENVA ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBFHENVAHTTSPY
1 month +0.8%-2.1%-18.4% -1.0%
3 months -4.2%-30.5%-18.1% +2.9%
6 months +16.0%-1.0%-17.8% +6.4%
Year to date +35.0%+4.9%-43.9% +11.4%
1 year +52.6%+44.6%-55.0% +13.1%
3 years +251.5%+273.3%+8.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +52.1%+55.2%+2.6% +21.5%
5 years +28.5%+373.3%+8.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.2%+36.5%+1.6% +10.9%
10 years -37.4%+1,702.5%— +255.2%
10 years, per year -4.6%+33.5%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBFHENVAHTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.8%46.6%57.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.6%51.4%59.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.171.191.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.320.96-0.96 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.4%-42.8%-66.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.9%-37.9%-59.8% -2.5%
52-week high $113.40$265.45$4.95 $779.14
52-week low $59.98$114.03$1.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBFHENVAHTT
P/E now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 11.0x 10.7xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.6x 1.1xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 13.1x 6.0xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 6.9x 2.0xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 0.7x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.61median 0.31 0.31median 0.31 —median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBFHENVAHTT
Revenue $3.96B $3.65B –
Gross profit – $2.21B –
Operating income – $878.11M –
Net income $569.00M $382.44M –
Free cash flow $2.19B $2.01B –
EPS (diluted) $13.88 $14.47 –
Cash & equivalents $3.68B $105.96M $561.74M
Total debt $12.30B $1.61B $879.65M
Shares (diluted) 40.70M 26.43M 500.73M
Enterprise value -$10.63B $3.84B -$2.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBFHENVAHTT
P/E 7.1x 10.7x –
P/FCF 1.8x 2.0x –
P/Operating cash flow 1.8x 2.0x –
P/S 1.0x 1.1x –
P/B 1.1x 2.6x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 2.6x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 1.7x 6.0x –
EV/EBIT 1.8x 6.4x –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 1.5x –
EV/FCF 1.2x 2.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 1.2x 2.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.61 0.31 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBFHENVAHTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 20.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 21.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 27.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 24.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 26.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 99.0% 30.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 26.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 129.1% 30.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.6% 34.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.3% 17.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 22.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.3% 17.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 23.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBFHENVAHTT
Gross margin – 60.6% –
EBITDA margin 39.7% 25.5% –
Operating margin – 24.0% –
Pretax margin 17.3% 13.5% –
Net margin 14.3% 10.5% –
FCF margin 55.4% 54.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 55.4% 56.2% –
Return on equity 17.0% 24.9% –
Return on assets 2.5% 5.1% –
Return on invested capital 20.2% 22.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.9x 5.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBFHENVAHTT
Debt / assets 10.9% 21.0% 16.0%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.0x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 1.6x –
Debt / FCF 1.1x 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 85.0% 79.6% 21.2%
Equity / assets 15.0% 20.4% 78.8%
Interest coverage 1.9x 2.3x –
Current ratio – – 4.8x
Quick ratio – – 2.4x
Cash ratio – – 2.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBFHENVAHTT
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield 14.5% 3.3% –
Shareholder yield 15.4% 3.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 7.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 2.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBFHENVAHTT
Forward P/E 8.7xFY2026 10.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $11.49FY2026 $16.45FY2026 $-0.04FY2024
EPS growth, next FY -5.5%FY2026 +26.9%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024
EPS growth, the year after +13.0% +24.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.92BFY2026 $3.64BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024
Revenue growth, next FY +1.9%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024
Revenue growth, the year after +11.8% +31.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBFHENVAHTT
Held by institutions 98.3% 94.5% 2.2%
Institutions holding 421 425 42
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.5% +0.4% -26.1%
Institutions buying 205 239 14
Institutions selling 155 134 21
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.78 0.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BFHENVAHTT
BFH 1.00 0.49 0.11
ENVA 0.49 1.00 0.09
HTT 0.11 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BFH, ENVA and HTT?

Enova International (ENVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) $4.06B, Enova International (ENVA) $4.24B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $824.60M.

Which stock is cheaper, BFH, ENVA and HTT?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 7.2x, Enova International (ENVA) 11.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) is cheapest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 8.7x, Enova International (ENVA) 10.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Enova International (ENVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +3.9%, Enova International (ENVA) +20.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) has the highest net margin (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 14.3%, Enova International (ENVA) 10.5%). On return on invested capital, Enova International (ENVA) leads (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 20.2%, Enova International (ENVA) 22.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) returned the most: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +52.6%, Enova International (ENVA) +44.6%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -55.0%. Over five years, Enova International (ENVA) compounded fastest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +5.2%/yr, Enova International (ENVA) +36.5%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 0.01%, Enova International (ENVA) 0.00%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 0.00%. Enova International (ENVA) and High Templar Tech (HTT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) has been the steadiest (Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 39.8%, Enova International (ENVA) 46.6%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 57.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BFH, ENVA and HTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.