APO vs KKR vs TFPM Stock Comparison

Apollo Global Management, Kkr and Triple Flag Precious Metals Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.
$98.02 +8.6% 1M -17.2% 1Y
Market cap
$85.68B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.31B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Triple Flag Precious Metals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Triple Flag Precious Metals 5, Apollo Global Management 4, Kkr 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAPOKKRTFPMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $67.54B $85.68B $5.76B KKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.0x 28.7x 21.1x TFPM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.3x 11.5x 21.1x KKR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +41.2% +31.1% +50.7% TFPM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.0% 14.0% 55.9% TFPM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% 6.0% — KKR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.8x 3.5x 0.4x APO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% APO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.8% -17.2% +4.1% TFPM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.9%/yr +3.3%/yr — APO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.5% 38.5% 44.5% APO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 59/100 75/100 TFPM

Percentile Scorecard

APOKKRTFPM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAPOKKRTFPM
Valuation 87 #25 of 181 81 #36 of 181 54 #83 of 181
Growth 71 #33 of 110 79 #24 of 110 89 #13 of 110
Profitability 63 #48 of 127 55 #58 of 127 90 #14 of 127
Financial Health 80 #34 of 162 33 #109 of 162 90 #17 of 162
Shareholder Returns 73 #21 of 76 48 #40 of 76 52 #37 of 76
Overall 75 59 75
  • APO ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • KKR ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • TFPM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAPOKKRTFPMSPY
1 month +4.9%+8.6%-5.6% -2.3%
3 months -7.7%-8.0%-1.3% -0.7%
6 months -7.4%-5.1%-7.8% +4.8%
Year to date -17.4%-23.1%-13.0% +10.3%
1 year -3.8%-17.2%+4.1% +10.3%
3 years +40.7%+60.5%+116.9% +73.0%
3 years, per year +12.1%+17.1%+29.5% +20.1%
5 years +53.4%+17.5%— +61.9%
5 years, per year +8.9%+3.3%— +10.1%
10 years +567.0%+596.2%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +20.9%+21.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAPOKKRTFPMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.5%38.5%44.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.6%41.0%48.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.121.431.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.10-0.450.09 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-49.8%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.7%-31.3%-30.1% -3.5%
52-week high $152.70$142.77$41.36 $779.14
52-week low $100.30$83.88$26.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAPOKKRTFPM
P/E now vs peer median 39.5xmedian 33.5x 28.7xmedian 33.5x 21.8xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 4.9x 4.0xmedian 4.9x 12.3xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 12.0x 12.8xmedian 12.0x 16.3xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 14.3x 36.8xmedian 14.3x -19.9xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.8x 2.6xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1,939median 0.97 0.97median 0.97 0.42median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAPOKKRTFPM
Revenue $35.90B $21.31B $488.58M
Gross profit $31.30B – $344.78M
Operating income $5.48B – $304.60M
Net income $3.80B $5.64B $411.98M
Free cash flow $9.47B $2.34B -$302.33M
R&D – – $4.88M
EPS (diluted) $2.91 $3.16 $1.34
Cash & equivalents $26.82B $21.08B $15.20M
Total debt $13.73B $53.48B $235.00M
Shares (diluted) 610.22M 945.58M 204.07M
Enterprise value -$15.26B $5.83B $5.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAPOKKRTFPM
P/E 39.5x 28.7x 21.8x
P/FCF 7.2x 36.8x -19.9x
P/Operating cash flow 7.2x 34.6x 15.2x
P/S 1.9x 4.0x 12.3x
P/B 1.6x 1.1x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 1.2x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 12.8x 16.3x
EV/EBIT 10.1x 12.6x 20.3x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 5.6x 12.7x
EV/FCF 5.8x 50.6x -20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.8x 47.6x 15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1,939 0.97 0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAPOKKRTFPM
Revenue growth (1Y) 41.2% 31.1% 50.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 24.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 36.5% – 76.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 38.0% – 78.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 63.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -27.0% 16.1% 139.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% 48.3% 89.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -47.4% 50.9% 840.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 29.7% 51.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 129.7% -47.6% 48.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 33.3% 43.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 129.7% -48.8% -213.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 32.8% -52.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAPOKKRTFPM
Gross margin 87.2% – 70.6%
EBITDA margin 19.7% 43.3% 77.7%
Operating margin 15.3% – 62.3%
Pretax margin 20.7% 31.1% 91.5%
Net margin 5.0% 14.0% 55.9%
FCF margin 26.4% 11.0% -61.9%
Operating cash flow margin 26.4% 11.7% 80.9%
Return on equity 10.6% 7.1% 18.6%
Return on assets 0.9% 1.3% 17.2%
Return on invested capital 5.8% 6.0% –
Return on capital employed – – 12.9%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 0.4x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.7% 3.6% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAPOKKRTFPM
Debt / assets 2.8% 12.9% 9.1%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.7x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.8x 3.5x 0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.4x 22.9x -0.8x
Liabilities / assets 91.6% 81.3% 11.3%
Equity / assets 8.4% 18.7% 88.7%
Interest coverage 18.2x 3.4x 83.2x
Current ratio – – 3.7x
Quick ratio – – 3.0x
Cash ratio – – 2.2x
Altman Z-score – – 13.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAPOKKRTFPM
Dividend yield 1.8% 0.8% 0.8%
Net buyback yield 1.9% 0.3% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 1.1% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 33.4% 11.9% 10.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 13.4% 28.6% -14.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) 11.7% 6.1% 11.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 7.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAPOKKRTFPM
Forward P/E 13.3xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 21.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.02FY2026 $8.52FY2026 $1.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.6%FY2026 +74.9%FY2026 +35.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.9% -18.9% -0.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.45BFY2026 $11.55BFY2026 $490.34MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -23.7%FY2026 +50.8%FY2026 +26.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.4% +1.9% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAPOKKRTFPM
Held by institutions 64.5% 60.4% 86.4%
Institutions holding 1,168 1,267 224
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% +3.8% +0.3%
Institutions buying 643 634 129
Institutions selling 372 458 53
Buyers to sellers 1.73 1.38 2.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

APOKKRTFPM
APO 1.00 0.81 0.05
KKR 0.81 1.00 0.13
TFPM 0.05 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, APO, KKR and TFPM?

Kkr (KKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Apollo Global Management (APO) $67.54B, Kkr (KKR) $85.68B, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) $5.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, APO, KKR and TFPM?

Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Apollo Global Management (APO) 38.0x, Kkr (KKR) 28.7x, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) 21.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kkr (KKR) is cheapest (Apollo Global Management (APO) 13.3x, Kkr (KKR) 11.5x, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) 21.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Apollo Global Management (APO) +41.2%, Kkr (KKR) +31.1%, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) +50.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) has the highest net margin (Apollo Global Management (APO) 5.0%, Kkr (KKR) 14.0%, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) 55.9%). On return on invested capital, Kkr (KKR) leads (Apollo Global Management (APO) 5.8%, Kkr (KKR) 6.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) returned the most: Apollo Global Management (APO) -3.8%, Kkr (KKR) -17.2%, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) +4.1%. Over five years, Apollo Global Management (APO) compounded fastest (Apollo Global Management (APO) +8.9%/yr, Kkr (KKR) +3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Apollo Global Management (APO) has the highest dividend yield: Apollo Global Management (APO) 0.02%, Kkr (KKR) 0.01%, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Apollo Global Management (APO) has been the steadiest (Apollo Global Management (APO) 36.5%, Kkr (KKR) 38.5%, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) 44.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, APO, KKR and TFPM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.