AMSC vs HUBB vs CAT Stock Comparison

American Superconductor, Hubbell and Caterpillar Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FPS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$437.90 -4.7% 1M -7.3% 1Y
Market cap
$22.74B
P/E
25.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.59B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
3 wins
CAT Caterpillar Inc
$647.25 -21.7% 1M +10.5% 1Y
Market cap
$291.81B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$77.77B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Caterpillar leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Caterpillar 5, Hubbell 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMSCHUBBCATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.24B $22.74B $291.81B CAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 25.0x 24.7x CAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.2x 21.8x 25.1x HUBB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.0% +20.3% CAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 13.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.5% -7.3% +10.5% CAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.8%/yr +17.1%/yr +26.0%/yr CAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.4% 32.0% 40.3% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 56/100 44/100 HUBB

Percentile Scorecard

AMSCHUBBCAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMSCHUBBCAT
Valuation – 38 #126 of 203 29 #144 of 203
Growth – 71 #56 of 188 74 #49 of 188
Profitability – 85 #28 of 183 77 #43 of 183
Financial Health 78 #17 of 72 16 #181 of 216 8 #199 of 216
Shareholder Returns – 72 #44 of 152 31 #105 of 152
Overall – 56 44
  • AMSC ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CAT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMSCHUBBCATSPY
1 month -3.8%-4.7%-21.7% +0.7%
3 months -4.8%-7.5%-20.0% +3.7%
6 months -47.6%-13.8%-27.3% +7.1%
Year to date -2.5%-1.4%+13.0% +12.8%
1 year -55.5%-7.3%+10.5% +11.9%
3 years +351.0%+54.6%+167.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +65.3%+15.6%+38.8% +22.8%
5 years +52.6%+119.6%+217.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +8.8%+17.1%+26.0% +10.9%
10 years +306.5%+318.6%+671.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +15.1%+15.4%+22.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAMSCHUBBCATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.4%32.0%40.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.5%35.3%42.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.471.191.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.65-0.230.26 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-33.1%-39.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.5%-21.5%-39.2% -1.2%
52-week high $63.01$557.85$1,064.90 $779.14
52-week low $25.01$407.36$546.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMSCHUBBCAT
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.6x 25.5xmedian 25.8x 25.2xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 3.5xmedian 1.9x 3.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.9x 17.3xmedian 14.6x —median 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 30.1x 24.9xmedian 22.2x 42.3xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.9x 5.6xmedian 2.2x 13.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 2.53median 1.45 1.95median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMSCHUBBCAT
Revenue – $6.59B $77.77B
Gross profit – $2.33B –
Operating income – $1.33B $14.25B
Net income – $915.00M $11.83B
Free cash flow – $928.00M –
R&D – – $2.31B
EPS (diluted) – $17.12 $25.58
Cash & equivalents $140.69M $334.50M $7.93B
Total debt – $5.12B –
Shares (diluted) 44.94M 53.10M 462.50M
Enterprise value $541.50M $20.98B $291.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMSCHUBBCAT
P/E – 25.5x 25.2x
P/FCF – 24.9x 42.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 20.9x 21.0x
P/S – 3.5x 3.8x
P/B 2.4x 5.6x 13.9x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 23.7x 14.1x
EV/EBITDA – 17.3x –
EV/EBIT – 20.9x –
EV/Revenue – 4.2x 3.8x
EV/FCF – 30.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 25.2x 21.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.53 1.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMSCHUBBCAT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.0% 20.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 17.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 15.2% 24.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% 7.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – 5.6% 27.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% 9.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 6.1% 29.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 10.1% 12.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.0% 22.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.5% 6.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMSCHUBBCAT
Gross margin – 35.4% –
EBITDA margin – 24.5% –
Operating margin – 20.2% –
Pretax margin – 17.7% –
Net margin – 13.8% –
FCF margin – 14.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 16.8% 18.2%
Return on equity – 22.8% 57.9%
Return on assets – 7.7% 11.3%
Return on invested capital – 11.3% –
Return on capital employed – 13.5% –
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMSCHUBBCAT
Debt / assets – 43.0% –
Debt / equity – 1.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.0x –
Debt / FCF – 5.5x –
Liabilities / assets 24.9% 65.4% 79.9%
Equity / assets 75.1% 34.6% 20.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.4x 1.5x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMSCHUBBCAT
Dividend yield – 1.3% 1.0%
Net buyback yield – 0.9% –
Shareholder yield – 2.2% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMSCHUBBCAT
Forward P/E 31.2xFY2026 21.8xFY2026 25.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $20.07FY2026 $25.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -75.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +35.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +40.0% +21.9% +31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $383.43MFY2026 $7.32BFY2026 $84.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.2%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026 +24.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +9.8% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMSCHUBBCAT
Held by institutions 73.7% 96.1% 72.3%
Institutions holding 278 1,016 4,059
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% -0.4% +0.5%
Institutions buying 173 511 1,890
Institutions selling 77 319 1,595
Buyers to sellers 2.25 1.60 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMSCHUBBCAT
AMSC 1.00 0.38 0.48
HUBB 0.38 1.00 0.59
CAT 0.48 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMSC, HUBB and CAT?

Caterpillar (CAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: American Superconductor (AMSC) $1.24B, Hubbell (HUBB) $22.74B, Caterpillar (CAT) $291.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMSC, HUBB and CAT?

Caterpillar (CAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hubbell (HUBB) 25.0x, Caterpillar (CAT) 24.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hubbell (HUBB) is cheapest (American Superconductor (AMSC) 31.2x, Hubbell (HUBB) 21.8x, Caterpillar (CAT) 25.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Caterpillar (CAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hubbell (HUBB) +16.0%, Caterpillar (CAT) +20.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caterpillar (CAT) returned the most: American Superconductor (AMSC) -55.5%, Hubbell (HUBB) -7.3%, Caterpillar (CAT) +10.5%. Over five years, Caterpillar (CAT) compounded fastest (American Superconductor (AMSC) +8.8%/yr, Hubbell (HUBB) +17.1%/yr, Caterpillar (CAT) +26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (American Superconductor (AMSC) 85.4%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.0%, Caterpillar (CAT) 40.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMSC, HUBB and CAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Caterpillar (CAT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.