Berkley W R WRB

NYSE WRB

$76.85 +0.93 (+1.22%)

As of: Nov 10, 2026 · 3:24 PM EST

Berkley W R (WRB) stock price is $76.85, up 1.22% on the day, as of Nov 10, 2026. It has a market cap of $29.44Bn and a P/E ratio of 15.80, and is classified in the Property and Casualty Insurance industry (Financial Services sector).

Key Stats

Market Cap29.44 Bn

P/E15.80

FCF (Yr)3.41 Bn

ROA (Yr)4.22

EV to EBIT5.72

Net Income (Yr)1.78 Bn

Enterprise Value14.10 Bn

Add ratio to table…

About

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a leading insurance holding company specializing in property and casualty insurance, operating as one of the largest commercial lines writers in the United States and globally. The company underwrites and reinsures a diverse range of risks, focusing on commercial insurance, specialty personal lines, and reinsurance solutions. Its operations are structured to address niche markets, leveraging specialized knowledge and decentralized decision-making…

The company generates revenue primarily through premiums collected from underwriting insurance policies and reinsurance contracts. Its insurance segment earns premiums by providing coverage for commercial risks, including excess and surplus lines, admitted lines, and specialty personal lines, while the reinsurance segment derives income from facultative and treaty reinsurance, monoline excess risk retention, and program management services. Investment income from its portfolio of fixed maturity securities, equities, and other assets further supplements earnings. The company’s revenue model is underpinned by disciplined pricing strategies aimed at achieving underwriting profitability, alongside fee-based services such as claims administration and consulting.

The company operates through the following segments:

Insurance: This segment underwrites predominantly commercial insurance, including excess and surplus lines, admitted lines, and specialty personal lines. It serves a broad spectrum of industries and customer types, from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies, offering tailored coverages such as general liability, professional liability, workers’ compensation, and property insurance. The segment operates through 53 internally developed and seven acquired businesses, each specializing in niche markets or geographic regions. Distribution channels include wholesale agents, brokers, managing general agents, and digital platforms, enabling flexibility in meeting diverse customer needs.
Reinsurance & Monoline Excess: This segment provides facultative and treaty reinsurance to insurance companies and self-insured entities, helping clients manage net risk exposure. It also includes monoline excess operations that retain risk on an excess basis and program management services for specialized insurance programs. The segment operates globally, with a focus on the United States, Asia Pacific, Europe, and the United Kingdom, offering solutions for casualty, property, and specialty lines. Key activities include underwriting support, claims consultation, and actuarial services to enhance clients’ product offerings.

W. R. Berkley Corporation holds a prominent position in the highly competitive property and casualty insurance industry, distinguishing itself through a decentralized operating model that emphasizes specialization and agility. The company competes with large national multi-line insurers, regional carriers, specialty insurers, and reinsurers, including Swiss Re, Munich Re, Berkshire Hathaway, and Hannover Re. Its competitive advantages lie in its ability to identify and capitalize on niche markets, leveraging deep industry expertise and localized underwriting to address complex or underserved risks. Strong financial strength ratings from A. M. Best, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch further bolster its market standing, reflecting robust capitalization and underwriting discipline.

The company serves a diverse customer base spanning industries such as construction, healthcare, technology, energy, transportation, and financial services. Its clients range from small and mid-sized businesses to large corporations, including Fortune 500 companies, as well as public entities, nonprofits, and high-net-worth individuals. While specific customer names are not disclosed, the company’s insurance and reinsurance solutions cater to businesses requiring specialized coverages, such as cyber risk, environmental liability, professional liability, and workers’ compensation. Its global footprint extends to markets in Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, Latin America, and the United Kingdom, enabling it to address regional and industry-specific risks.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

W. R. Berkley Corporation is positioned to capitalize on the ongoing shift in market dynamics where national carriers are broadening their appetite and intensifying competition in specific pockets, creating opportunities for Berkley to deploy its capital selectively in lines with attractive risk-adjusted returns, particularly in casualty and professional liability segments where pricing discipline has been maintained despite market softening elsewhere. This strategic pivot—evidenced by management’s comments about taking a "foot off the rate pedal" to pursue growth in margin-supportive areas—allows Berkley to leverage its broad product diversification and decentralized underwriting model to exploit inefficiencies that more narrowly focused peers cannot, especially as the company continues to generate strong operating cash flow ($668 million in Q1 FY26) that fuels both investment income growth and shareholder returns without compromising underwriting integrity. The company’s ability to grow net premiums written in the insurance segment by 3.2% despite heightened competition, coupled with a record net investment income driven by core portfolio growth (11.8%) and investment fund income surging 46.3%, demonstrates a resilient earnings engine where investment performance complements underwriting profitability, supporting sustained double-digit returns on equity even in a competitive pricing environment.
The company’s exceptionally strong balance sheet, highlighted by a financial leverage ratio of just 22.6%—described by management as an "all-time low"—combined with a very strong AA- rated investment portfolio and a book yield of 4.7% with new money rates at 5%+, creates significant flexibility to deploy capital toward higher-returning opportunities, whether through organic growth in niche markets, strategic tuck-in acquisitions, or increased shareholder returns, all while maintaining a conservative risk profile. This capital strength is further reinforced by the duration of the fixed maturity portfolio (3.1 years) being comfortably below the average life of insurance reserves (~4 years), allowing Berkley to safely extend duration to lock in higher yields as interest rates stabilize, thereby boosting net investment income without increasing asset-liability mismatch risk, a lever that management explicitly noted as having "meaningful upside" given the $25.5 billion in investable assets (excluding cash).
Berkley Environmental’s recent leadership transition, with the appointment of R. Christopher DeLauder as president—bringing nearly 40 years of specialized environmental insurance expertise—signals a renewed focus on a growing niche market driven by increasing regulatory scrutiny, climate-related liabilities, and rising demand for customized environmental risk solutions, a segment that remains under-penetrated by broader competitors and offers attractive margins due to specialized underwriting expertise and limited capacity, positioning this business to become a meaningful contributor to long-term growth as environmental risks intensify globally and corporates seek tailored coverage beyond standard policies.

W. R. Berkley Corporation is positioned to capitalize on the ongoing shift in market dynamics where national carriers are broadening their appetite and intensifying competition in specific pockets, creating opportunities for Berkley to deploy its capital selectively in lines with attractive risk-adjusted returns, particularly in casualty and professional liability segments where pricing discipline has been maintained despite market softening elsewhere. This strategic pivot—evidenced by management’s comments about taking a "foot off the rate pedal" to pursue growth in margin-supportive areas—allows Berkley to leverage its broad product diversification and decentralized underwriting model to exploit inefficiencies that more narrowly focused peers cannot, especially as the company continues to generate strong operating cash flow ($668 million in Q1 FY26) that fuels both investment income growth and shareholder returns without compromising underwriting integrity. The company’s ability to grow net premiums written in the insurance segment by 3.2% despite heightened competition, coupled with a record net investment income driven by core portfolio growth (11.8%) and investment fund income surging 46.3%, demonstrates a resilient earnings engine where investment performance complements underwriting profitability, supporting sustained double-digit returns on equity even in a competitive pricing environment.
The company’s exceptionally strong balance sheet, highlighted by a financial leverage ratio of just 22.6%—described by management as an "all-time low"—combined with a very strong AA- rated investment portfolio and a book yield of 4.7% with new money rates at 5%+, creates significant flexibility to deploy capital toward higher-returning opportunities, whether through organic growth in niche markets, strategic tuck-in acquisitions, or increased shareholder returns, all while maintaining a conservative risk profile. This capital strength is further reinforced by the duration of the fixed maturity portfolio (3.1 years) being comfortably below the average life of insurance reserves (~4 years), allowing Berkley to safely extend duration to lock in higher yields as interest rates stabilize, thereby boosting net investment income without increasing asset-liability mismatch risk, a lever that management explicitly noted as having "meaningful upside" given the $25.5 billion in investable assets (excluding cash).
Berkley Environmental’s recent leadership transition, with the appointment of R. Christopher DeLauder as president—bringing nearly 40 years of specialized environmental insurance expertise—signals a renewed focus on a growing niche market driven by increasing regulatory scrutiny, climate-related liabilities, and rising demand for customized environmental risk solutions, a segment that remains under-penetrated by broader competitors and offers attractive margins due to specialized underwriting expertise and limited capacity, positioning this business to become a meaningful contributor to long-term growth as environmental risks intensify globally and corporates seek tailored coverage beyond standard policies.

▼ Bear case

W. R. Berkley Corporation faces mounting pressure from the accelerating pace of competition in the property and property catastrophe reinsurance markets, where management acknowledged being "taken aback" by the speed of change and noted that increased competition in the property cat market will likely spur irrational behavior that could spill over into the liability market, undermining underwriting discipline and potentially eroding margins in lines where the company has historically relied on rate adequacy, particularly as national carriers deepen their presence in marginal E&S and standard-risk segments, increasing pressure on Berkley to either accept lower prices or lose share.
Despite strong top-line growth in gross premiums written (+4.5%), the material divergence between gross and net premiums written (+3.2%) in the insurance segment reveals a growing reliance on purchasing reinsurance rather than selling it—a shift management acknowledged by stating it is "better to be a buyer than a seller of reinsurance"—which suggests that Berkley is finding it increasingly difficult to retain risk on its balance sheet at acceptable terms, either due to insufficient pricing in the direct market or heightened competition making it costly to assume exposure, a trend that could constrain underwriting profitability growth if reinsurance costs continue to rise or availability tightens.
The company’s heavy reliance on investment income to bolster overall profitability—where net investment income grew 12.2% and contributed significantly to the 21.2% ROE—masks potential fragility in underwriting earnings, as the current accident year loss ratio ex-cats worsened slightly (59.7% vs. 59.4% prior year) and the Insurance segment’s loss ratio ex-cats increased to 60.9%, indicating that underlying underwriting profitability is weakening despite favorable catastrophe experience, and with management explicitly stating they do not subscribe to cash flow underwriting or using investment returns to justify weak underwriting, any deterioration in investment yields or increase in credit risk could quickly expose the vulnerability of relying on investment gains to sustain headline returns, especially in a rising rate environment where duration extension has limits and mark-to-market volatility could impact the large ($25.5 billion) fixed maturity portfolio.

W. R. Berkley Corporation faces mounting pressure from the accelerating pace of competition in the property and property catastrophe reinsurance markets, where management acknowledged being "taken aback" by the speed of change and noted that increased competition in the property cat market will likely spur irrational behavior that could spill over into the liability market, undermining underwriting discipline and potentially eroding margins in lines where the company has historically relied on rate adequacy, particularly as national carriers deepen their presence in marginal E&S and standard-risk segments, increasing pressure on Berkley to either accept lower prices or lose share.
Despite strong top-line growth in gross premiums written (+4.5%), the material divergence between gross and net premiums written (+3.2%) in the insurance segment reveals a growing reliance on purchasing reinsurance rather than selling it—a shift management acknowledged by stating it is "better to be a buyer than a seller of reinsurance"—which suggests that Berkley is finding it increasingly difficult to retain risk on its balance sheet at acceptable terms, either due to insufficient pricing in the direct market or heightened competition making it costly to assume exposure, a trend that could constrain underwriting profitability growth if reinsurance costs continue to rise or availability tightens.
The company’s heavy reliance on investment income to bolster overall profitability—where net investment income grew 12.2% and contributed significantly to the 21.2% ROE—masks potential fragility in underwriting earnings, as the current accident year loss ratio ex-cats worsened slightly (59.7% vs. 59.4% prior year) and the Insurance segment’s loss ratio ex-cats increased to 60.9%, indicating that underlying underwriting profitability is weakening despite favorable catastrophe experience, and with management explicitly stating they do not subscribe to cash flow underwriting or using investment returns to justify weak underwriting, any deterioration in investment yields or increase in credit risk could quickly expose the vulnerability of relying on investment gains to sustain headline returns, especially in a rising rate environment where duration extension has limits and mark-to-market volatility could impact the large ($25.5 billion) fixed maturity portfolio.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History

Consolidation Items Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History

Peer percentiles

How Berkley W R ranks

Ranked against the 126 companies in Insurance58 metrics · as of Nov 6, 2026

Valuation

12 metrics · Lower multiples rank higher; a negative multiple ranks last

P/E 16.1xMedian 10.9x 39^th
P/FCF 9.29xMedian 8.29x 48^th
P/Operating cash flow 8.95xMedian 7.73x 47^th
P/S 1.92xMedian 1.39x 37^th
P/B 2.97xMedian 1.49x 19^th
P/Tangible book 2.97xMedian 1.51x 17^th
EV/EBITDA 11.2xMedian 7.11x 40^th
EV/EBIT 10.9xMedian 7.82x 43^rd
EV/Revenue 1.80xMedian 1.25x 38^th
EV/FCF 8.70xMedian 8.31x 51^st
EV/Operating cash flow 8.39xMedian 8.13x 50^th
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.30Median 0.62 23^rd

Growth

14 metrics · Year-on-year growth and three-year compound annual growth

Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5%Median 7.4% 24^th
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6%Median 8.4% 46^th
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8%Median 10.8% 25^th
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.4%Median 12.1% 38^th
Operating income growth (1Y) −3.9%Median 11.1% 30^th
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.8%Median 17.8% 43^rd
Net income growth (1Y) −2.3%Median 16.8% 28^th
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.9%Median 15.7% 38^th
EPS growth (1Y) 0.0%Median 18.6% 28^th
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.4%Median 18.7% 40^th
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) −6.0%Median 10.7% 31^st
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8%Median 15.4% 26^th
Free cash flow growth (1Y) −7.5%Median 10.8% 31^st
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.3%Median 16.9% 28^th

Profitability

14 metrics · Margins, returns on capital and the quality of earnings

Gross margin 47.3%Median 55.0% 34^th
EBITDA margin 16.1%Median 17.1% 45^th
Operating margin 16.6%Median 16.0% 53^rd
Pretax margin 15.7%Median 13.9% 56^th
Net margin 12.5%Median 11.1% 57^th
FCF margin 20.7%Median 18.0% 60^th
Operating cash flow margin 21.5%Median 19.0% 58^th
Return on equity 19.2%Median 13.9% 69^th
Return on assets 4.1%Median 3.3% 57^th
Return on invested capital 16.9%Median 11.9% 73^rd
Return on capital employed —Median 9.7% No data —
Asset turnover 0.33xMedian 0.26x 64^th
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.71xMedian 1.52x 59^th
Stock comp / revenue 0.4%Median 1.0% 89^th

Financial Health

11 metrics · Leverage, liquidity and solvency; less debt ranks higher

Debt / assets 3.9%Median 5.8% 64^th
Debt / equity 0.18xMedian 0.29x 70^th
Net debt / EBITDA −0.75xMedian −0.15x 64^th
Debt / FCF 0.58xMedian 1.20x 76^th
Liabilities / assets 78.9%Median 77.0% 43^rd
Equity / assets 21.1%Median 23.0% 42^nd
Interest coverage 19.5xMedian 8.16x 79^th
Current ratio —Median 1.46x No data —
Quick ratio —Median 0.69x No data —
Cash ratio —Median 0.27x No data —
Altman Z-score —Median 1.72 No data —

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Property and Casualty Insurance

View all peers

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	CB	Chubb Ltd	140.29 Bn	12.49	2.27	19.09 Bn
2	PGR	Progressive Corp/Oh/	132.20 Bn	11.38	1.44	8.39 Bn
3	MRSH	Marsh & Mclennan Companies, Inc.	96.60 Bn	23.91	3.39	20.53 Bn
4	TRV	Travelers Companies, Inc.	82.11 Bn	9.86	1.68	9.81 Bn
5	MFC	Manulife Financial Corp	75.43 Bn	20.04	12.94	5.61 Bn
6	AJG	Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.	71.09 Bn	41.84	4.34	12.74 Bn
7	AON	Aon plc	70.49 Bn	17.93	3.99	28.04 Bn
8	WRB	Berkley W R Corp	29.44 Bn	15.80	1.98	1.78 Bn