Soluna Holdings (SLNH) stock price is $0.59, down 12.01% on the day, as of Oct 19, 2026. It has a market cap of $76.14Mn, and is classified in the Data Centers industry (Technology sector).
Enterprise Value
Margins
P/FCF
Key Stats
Market Cap76.14 Mn
P/E-0.99
P/S1.81
Div. Yield0.00
Total Debt (Qtr)30.10 Mn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)144.56
Add ratio to table…
About
Soluna Holdings Inc develops owns and operates digital infrastructure for energy intensive computing applications by colocating data centers with renewable energy power plants. The company calls this approach Renewable Computing and targets Bitcoin mining artificial intelligence and high performance computing workloads. It uses two data center designs a modular design for Bitcoin operations and an AI ready design for higher density compute environments. Its proprietary…
Soluna Holdings Inc develops owns and operates digital infrastructure for energy intensive computing applications by colocating data centers with renewable energy power plants. The company calls this approach Renewable Computing and targets Bitcoin mining artificial intelligence and high performance computing workloads. It uses two data center designs a modular design for Bitcoin operations and an AI ready design for higher density compute environments. Its proprietary MaestroOS software analyzes power pricing weather grid demand and market signals to optimize performance and power consumption. By working with renewable developers and accessing power behind the meter the company seeks to convert underutilized energy into productive computing capacity.
The company generates revenue from four primary sources. Bitcoin mining revenue comes from block rewards and transaction fees earned through proprietary mining operations. Bitcoin hosting revenue is derived from colocation and hosting services provided to third party mining customers under fixed fee profit share or fixed fee service agreement models. The high performance computing business will generate revenue from leasing and hosting AI ready data center capacity for AI and other high performance workloads. Demand response revenue is received for providing dispatchable energy resources to grid operators and utilities. In 2025 Bitcoin hosting accounted for about 57 percent of total revenue Bitcoin mining for about 38 percent demand response for about 4 percent and the HPC business contributed a smaller share.
The company operates through the following segments.
Bitcoin Mining Business involves proprietary Bitcoin mining using specialized computing equipment to validate transactions and secure the blockchain. The company operates data centers with both proprietary and third party hardware and software and uses its MaestroOS platform to optimize performance and power consumption. Revenue comes from block rewards and transaction fees which are converted to U. S. dollars upon receipt.
Bitcoin Hosting Business provides colocation and hosting services to third party Bitcoin mining customers at modular data centers. Customers contract for capacity based on power requirements and choose among fixed fee profit share or fixed fee service agreement models. Revenue is generated from fees charged for managed hashrate and energy consumption.
HPC Business focuses on developing AI ready data center leasing and hosting solutions for AI and other high performance computing workloads. The company is advancing projects such as Project Kati 2 which is being engineered for more than 300 MW of capacity in partnership with Metrobloks. The segment aims to serve hyperscalers neoclouds and enterprise customers over time.
Demand Response Business provides demand response services to grid operators and utilities by using data centers as dispatchable energy resources. Facilities participate in ancillary services programs where they commit to reduce power consumption when called upon and receive compensation for maintaining dispatch capability.
Soluna Holdings Inc positions itself as a differentiated provider of renewable powered digital infrastructure by co locating data centers directly with renewable generation assets. This behind the meter approach gives it access to low cost power and helps avoid long interconnection queues which improves time to market for energy intensive workloads. In the Bitcoin mining and hosting space the company competes with firms such as Riot Platforms Marathon Digital Holdings Core Scientific Hut 8 Bitdeer Compass Mining and Blockware. In the high performance computing arena it faces competition from Applied Digital Digital Realty Crusoe CoreWeave Lambda FluidStack and Nebius. The company believes its competitive advantages stem from its ability to source curtailed or underutilized renewable electricity at favorable prices its proprietary MaestroOS optimization software and its focus on sustainability aligned computing solutions.
The company serves a diverse customer base that includes large scale Bitcoin mining operators hyperscalers neoclouds enterprise customers and grid operators. Specific customers named in the filing are Blockware Compass Mining Metrobloks Siemens and Galaxy Digital.
Sector:TechnologySector rationaleThe company's primary revenue is derived from digital infrastructure, specifically Bitcoin mining, Bitcoin hosting, and high-performance computing (HPC) for AI, which fall under Data Centers and Crypto Mining in the Technology sector. A secondary sector of Industrials is justified because the company operates a distinct 'Demand Response' business line, providing dispatchable energy resources and ancillary services to grid operators and utilities.Industries:Data CentersData CentersPrimarySoluna owns and operates physical data center facilities providing colocation and hosting services for third-party Bitcoin miners and HPC workloads. Its revenue is heavily driven by Bitcoin hosting (57% of revenue) and the development of AI-ready data center capacity for hyperscalers and neoclouds.Crypto MiningCrypto MiningSecondaryThe company operates proprietary Bitcoin mining using specialized computing equipment to earn block rewards and transaction fees, which accounted for approximately 38% of its 2025 revenue.AI PlatformsAI PlatformsSecondarySoluna is developing and leasing AI-ready data center capacity specifically for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads, targeting customers like neoclouds and enterprise AI users.Classified using BQ-MICSCIK: 0000064463
Bull & bear
Investment Thesis
▲ Bull case
Soluna’s acquisition of the 150 MW Briscoe Wind Farm for $53 million creates immediate vertical integration at Project Dorothy, eliminating reliance on third-party power purchase agreements and securing long-term energy sovereignty—a critical moat in the AI infrastructure race where power availability is the primary constraint. This transaction is projected to deliver $6–11 million in Year-One Adjusted EBITDA and $20–24.4 million in annualized revenue, providing immediate cash flow accretive to the balance sheet while de-risking future expansion. With full ownership of power, land, and compute at Dorothy 1A and 1B, Soluna now controls the entire generation-to-compute chain for 50 MW, positioning it to rapidly advance Project Dorothy 3—a planned 300 MW+ AI campus on 300 new acres adjacent to existing sites. This vertical integration strategy transforms Soluna from an energy consumer to a producer, enabling superior returns by capturing value across the entire stack and reducing exposure to volatile power pricing, a structural advantage competitors relying on PPAs cannot replicate. The development pipeline exceeding 4.3 GW, including 1 GW+ in active development, construction, or operations, underscores scalable optionality beyond current projects.
The execution of the Equipment Supply Agreement with Cormint for eight modular data center units at Project Kati 1 represents a hidden catalyst for accelerated scaling, with manufacturing underway and delivery targeted for Q1 2026 and commissioning by Q2 2026. These plug-and-play, pre-tested modular units—featuring integrated 2MW transformers, smart power distribution, high-performance cooling, and universal racking—minimize on-site labor and energization timelines, directly addressing a key industry bottleneck in data center deployment speed. By standardizing infrastructure, Soluna achieves repeatability and operational efficiency, allowing rapid deployment aligned with available clean power at Kati 1’s 83 MW wind-powered campus. This approach not only accelerates revenue recognition from the initial 12 MW deployment but establishes a blueprint for future phases of Kati 1 and Kati 2, where modularity enables incremental capacity additions without redesign delays. The partnership with Cormint, which has delivered over 130 MW of similar infrastructure, validates the technical and execution readiness of this model, turning a potential execution risk into a scalable, capital-efficient growth lever.
Soluna’s strategic pivot toward AI and high-performance computing (HPC) is gaining traction through underappreciated partnerships, including the MOU with Siemens for a 2 MW behind-the-meter pilot at Project Grace and the co-development agreement with Metrobloks for Project Kati 2’s initial 100+ MW AI/HPC phase. The Siemens collaboration directly addresses a critical industry pain point—GPU-driven power demand swings destabilizing renewable-powered grids—by validating a repeatable blueprint for stable, efficient AI deployments using existing infrastructure. Success here could unlock broader behind-the-meter AI applications across Soluna’s pipeline, transforming curtailed renewable energy into high-value compute. Simultaneously, the Metrobloks partnership leverages their expertise in AI-ready design and customer acquisition to accelerate Kati 2’s time-to-market, with Soluna contributing site control, power entitlements, and development expertise while Metrobloks handles leasing and operations. This structure allows Soluna to focus on its core competency—renewable-powered digital infrastructure—while accessing Metrobloks’ proven platform for scaling dense GPU workloads, a combination that could rapidly monetize Kati 2’s 300 MW+ expansion potential as AI demand outpaces traditional data center supply.
The consolidation of 100% equity ownership in Project Dorothy 1B via the $8.8 million acquisition from Navitas Global completes Soluna’s control over the Dorothy 1 campus, removing a key governance barrier to converting the site to AI/HPC workloads and marketing Dorothy 3 to prospective customers. With Briscoe Wind Farm now powering 100% owned Dorothy 1A and 1B, Soluna has eliminated third-party equity interests that could delay or complicate strategic decisions, enabling unilateral control over timing, partnerships, and conversion to higher-margin AI infrastructure. This full ownership is not merely administrative—it is a prerequisite for attracting enterprise AI clients who require assured, long-term control over power and infrastructure to justify multi-year commitments. The ability to now “decide when and how we convert” Dorothy 1 to AI, as stated by the CEO, removes a significant overhang on future revenue potential and positions Soluna to capture premium pricing in the AI compute market, where energy certainty and infrastructure control are increasingly valued over pure Bitcoin mining exposure.
Soluna’s acquisition of the 150 MW Briscoe Wind Farm for $53 million creates immediate vertical integration at Project Dorothy, eliminating reliance on third-party power purchase agreements and securing long-term energy sovereignty—a critical moat in the AI infrastructure race where power availability is the primary constraint. This transaction is projected to deliver $6–11 million in Year-One Adjusted EBITDA and $20–24.4 million in annualized revenue, providing immediate cash flow accretive to the balance sheet while de-risking future expansion. With full ownership of power, land, and compute at Dorothy 1A and 1B, Soluna now controls the entire generation-to-compute chain for 50 MW, positioning it to rapidly advance Project Dorothy 3—a planned 300 MW+ AI campus on 300 new acres adjacent to existing sites. This vertical integration strategy transforms Soluna from an energy consumer to a producer, enabling superior returns by capturing value across the entire stack and reducing exposure to volatile power pricing, a structural advantage competitors relying on PPAs cannot replicate. The development pipeline exceeding 4.3 GW, including 1 GW+ in active development, construction, or operations, underscores scalable optionality beyond current projects.
The execution of the Equipment Supply Agreement with Cormint for eight modular data center units at Project Kati 1 represents a hidden catalyst for accelerated scaling, with manufacturing underway and delivery targeted for Q1 2026 and commissioning by Q2 2026. These plug-and-play, pre-tested modular units—featuring integrated 2MW transformers, smart power distribution, high-performance cooling, and universal racking—minimize on-site labor and energization timelines, directly addressing a key industry bottleneck in data center deployment speed. By standardizing infrastructure, Soluna achieves repeatability and operational efficiency, allowing rapid deployment aligned with available clean power at Kati 1’s 83 MW wind-powered campus. This approach not only accelerates revenue recognition from the initial 12 MW deployment but establishes a blueprint for future phases of Kati 1 and Kati 2, where modularity enables incremental capacity additions without redesign delays. The partnership with Cormint, which has delivered over 130 MW of similar infrastructure, validates the technical and execution readiness of this model, turning a potential execution risk into a scalable, capital-efficient growth lever.
Soluna’s strategic pivot toward AI and high-performance computing (HPC) is gaining traction through underappreciated partnerships, including the MOU with Siemens for a 2 MW behind-the-meter pilot at Project Grace and the co-development agreement with Metrobloks for Project Kati 2’s initial 100+ MW AI/HPC phase. The Siemens collaboration directly addresses a critical industry pain point—GPU-driven power demand swings destabilizing renewable-powered grids—by validating a repeatable blueprint for stable, efficient AI deployments using existing infrastructure. Success here could unlock broader behind-the-meter AI applications across Soluna’s pipeline, transforming curtailed renewable energy into high-value compute. Simultaneously, the Metrobloks partnership leverages their expertise in AI-ready design and customer acquisition to accelerate Kati 2’s time-to-market, with Soluna contributing site control, power entitlements, and development expertise while Metrobloks handles leasing and operations. This structure allows Soluna to focus on its core competency—renewable-powered digital infrastructure—while accessing Metrobloks’ proven platform for scaling dense GPU workloads, a combination that could rapidly monetize Kati 2’s 300 MW+ expansion potential as AI demand outpaces traditional data center supply.
The consolidation of 100% equity ownership in Project Dorothy 1B via the $8.8 million acquisition from Navitas Global completes Soluna’s control over the Dorothy 1 campus, removing a key governance barrier to converting the site to AI/HPC workloads and marketing Dorothy 3 to prospective customers. With Briscoe Wind Farm now powering 100% owned Dorothy 1A and 1B, Soluna has eliminated third-party equity interests that could delay or complicate strategic decisions, enabling unilateral control over timing, partnerships, and conversion to higher-margin AI infrastructure. This full ownership is not merely administrative—it is a prerequisite for attracting enterprise AI clients who require assured, long-term control over power and infrastructure to justify multi-year commitments. The ability to now “decide when and how we convert” Dorothy 1 to AI, as stated by the CEO, removes a significant overhang on future revenue potential and positions Soluna to capture premium pricing in the AI compute market, where energy certainty and infrastructure control are increasingly valued over pure Bitcoin mining exposure.
Soluna’s financial performance reveals a deteriorating core business model despite project expansions, with FY 2025 revenue declining 22% year-over-year to $29.7 million from $38.0 million in FY 2024, driven by a 33% drop in cryptocurrency mining revenue to $11.4 million from $17.0 million. This decline occurred even as the company doubled its operating capacity and added new projects like Kati 1 and Dorothy 2, indicating that new capacity is not being effectively monetized or is offset by lower utilization, falling Bitcoin prices, or higher energy costs. The gross profit margin collapsed from 24.7% in FY 2024 to 21.7% in FY 2025, with Adjusted EBITDA worsening from $942 thousand to a loss of $13.2 million, signaling that operational scale is not translating to profitability. The company’s reliance on volatile cryptocurrency revenues—still comprising 38% of total revenue despite diversification efforts—exposes it to sector-specific downturns, and the lack of meaningful growth in high-performance computing services (only $28 thousand in revenue) underscores the immaturity of its AI pivot. Without a clear path to replacing Bitcoin mining revenue with stable, higher-margin AI/HPC contracts, the company risks growing into a larger loss base as capacity expansion outpaces monetization.
The aggressive capital deployment strategy, including the $53 million Briscoe Wind Farm acquisition and $8.8 million Dorothy 1B purchase, has significantly increased leverage and complexified the balance sheet, raising concerns about financial flexibility amid unproven AI monetization. Long-term debt rose to $17.9 million from $7.1 million year-over-year, and while the current ratio improved to 1.9x, this is partly driven by $88.8 million in cash—much of which originated from equity raises ($34.1 million from ATM offerings, $29.7 million from December issuance) rather than operational cash flow. Net cash used in operating activities was $9.1 million in FY 2025, and investing activities consumed $31.9 million, meaning growth is being financed by dilution and debt, not internal generation. The company’s development pipeline exceeding 4.3 GW remains largely theoretical, with most projects in early stages; for example, Kati 2 and Dorothy 3 are described as “under development” with no firm timelines or customer commitments. This creates a risk of overbuilding in anticipation of demand that may not materialize, especially if AI infrastructure demand softens or competitors with stronger balance sheets and established client bases (e.g., CoreWeave, Lambda) capture market share first.
Strategic partnerships with Siemens and Metrobloks, while promising, are currently limited to non-binding MOUs and pilots with no guaranteed revenue or scalability, representing execution risk rather than near-term catalysts. The 2 MW Siemens pilot at Project Grace is a small-scale test with no commitment to broader deployment, and success in a controlled environment does not guarantee replication across Soluna’s larger sites, particularly given the technical complexity of managing GPU-driven power fluctuations on renewable grids. Similarly, the Metrobloks collaboration for Kati 2 hinges on forming a project company, securing third-party capital, and leasing to tenants—steps that have not yet begun despite the MOU being signed. The reliance on a “non-binding letter of intent” from a potential neocloud tenant further underscores the lack of near-term revenue visibility. These partnerships may dilute Soluna’s returns through profit-sharing or joint venture structures, and if they fail to deliver on accelerated timelines or customer acquisition, the company could be left with overbuilt infrastructure and stranded capital, particularly as construction costs for AI-ready data centers remain high and specialization increases execution risk.
Soluna’s pivot to AI infrastructure faces significant structural headwinds from established players with superior scale, technology, and customer relationships, threatening its ability to capture meaningful share in a rapidly consolidating market. The AI data center landscape is increasingly dominated by hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP) and specialized providers like CoreWeave and Lambda, which benefit from deep developer ecosystems, proprietary software stacks, and established relationships with AI model trainers and enterprises. Soluna’s MaestroOS™ platform, while proprietary, lacks evidence of widespread adoption or differentiation beyond basic grid optimization, and its focus on renewable energy may actually be a disadvantage in AI workloads where ultra-reliable, low-latency power—often best served by grid-connected or nuclear-backed facilities—is prioritized over sustainability claims. The company’s Texas-centric footprint also limits geographic diversification, exposing it to regional risks like extreme weather, grid congestion, or ERCOT market volatility, whereas competitors offer global footprints with multiple redundancy options. Without a clear technological or cost advantage in AI-specific metrics (e.g., FLOPS per dollar, deployment speed, software integration), Soluna risks being relegated to a niche player in renewable-powered compute rather than a mainstream AI infrastructure provider.
Soluna’s financial performance reveals a deteriorating core business model despite project expansions, with FY 2025 revenue declining 22% year-over-year to $29.7 million from $38.0 million in FY 2024, driven by a 33% drop in cryptocurrency mining revenue to $11.4 million from $17.0 million. This decline occurred even as the company doubled its operating capacity and added new projects like Kati 1 and Dorothy 2, indicating that new capacity is not being effectively monetized or is offset by lower utilization, falling Bitcoin prices, or higher energy costs. The gross profit margin collapsed from 24.7% in FY 2024 to 21.7% in FY 2025, with Adjusted EBITDA worsening from $942 thousand to a loss of $13.2 million, signaling that operational scale is not translating to profitability. The company’s reliance on volatile cryptocurrency revenues—still comprising 38% of total revenue despite diversification efforts—exposes it to sector-specific downturns, and the lack of meaningful growth in high-performance computing services (only $28 thousand in revenue) underscores the immaturity of its AI pivot. Without a clear path to replacing Bitcoin mining revenue with stable, higher-margin AI/HPC contracts, the company risks growing into a larger loss base as capacity expansion outpaces monetization.
The aggressive capital deployment strategy, including the $53 million Briscoe Wind Farm acquisition and $8.8 million Dorothy 1B purchase, has significantly increased leverage and complexified the balance sheet, raising concerns about financial flexibility amid unproven AI monetization. Long-term debt rose to $17.9 million from $7.1 million year-over-year, and while the current ratio improved to 1.9x, this is partly driven by $88.8 million in cash—much of which originated from equity raises ($34.1 million from ATM offerings, $29.7 million from December issuance) rather than operational cash flow. Net cash used in operating activities was $9.1 million in FY 2025, and investing activities consumed $31.9 million, meaning growth is being financed by dilution and debt, not internal generation. The company’s development pipeline exceeding 4.3 GW remains largely theoretical, with most projects in early stages; for example, Kati 2 and Dorothy 3 are described as “under development” with no firm timelines or customer commitments. This creates a risk of overbuilding in anticipation of demand that may not materialize, especially if AI infrastructure demand softens or competitors with stronger balance sheets and established client bases (e.g., CoreWeave, Lambda) capture market share first.
Strategic partnerships with Siemens and Metrobloks, while promising, are currently limited to non-binding MOUs and pilots with no guaranteed revenue or scalability, representing execution risk rather than near-term catalysts. The 2 MW Siemens pilot at Project Grace is a small-scale test with no commitment to broader deployment, and success in a controlled environment does not guarantee replication across Soluna’s larger sites, particularly given the technical complexity of managing GPU-driven power fluctuations on renewable grids. Similarly, the Metrobloks collaboration for Kati 2 hinges on forming a project company, securing third-party capital, and leasing to tenants—steps that have not yet begun despite the MOU being signed. The reliance on a “non-binding letter of intent” from a potential neocloud tenant further underscores the lack of near-term revenue visibility. These partnerships may dilute Soluna’s returns through profit-sharing or joint venture structures, and if they fail to deliver on accelerated timelines or customer acquisition, the company could be left with overbuilt infrastructure and stranded capital, particularly as construction costs for AI-ready data centers remain high and specialization increases execution risk.
Soluna’s pivot to AI infrastructure faces significant structural headwinds from established players with superior scale, technology, and customer relationships, threatening its ability to capture meaningful share in a rapidly consolidating market. The AI data center landscape is increasingly dominated by hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP) and specialized providers like CoreWeave and Lambda, which benefit from deep developer ecosystems, proprietary software stacks, and established relationships with AI model trainers and enterprises. Soluna’s MaestroOS™ platform, while proprietary, lacks evidence of widespread adoption or differentiation beyond basic grid optimization, and its focus on renewable energy may actually be a disadvantage in AI workloads where ultra-reliable, low-latency power—often best served by grid-connected or nuclear-backed facilities—is prioritized over sustainability claims. The company’s Texas-centric footprint also limits geographic diversification, exposing it to regional risks like extreme weather, grid congestion, or ERCOT market volatility, whereas competitors offer global footprints with multiple redundancy options. Without a clear technological or cost advantage in AI-specific metrics (e.g., FLOPS per dollar, deployment speed, software integration), Soluna risks being relegated to a niche player in renewable-powered compute rather than a mainstream AI infrastructure provider.