Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Huntington Ingalls Industries

NYSE: HII

$289.43 ▼ -0.03 (-0.01%)

At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap10.96 Bn

P/E18.12

P/S0.85

Div. Yield0.02

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)2.70 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)13.35

Add ratio to table…

About

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is a global all-domain defense partner that designs, builds, and maintains naval ships and develops integrated technology solutions for the U. S. Government and allied forces. The company operates through three core business segments: Ingalls Shipbuilding, Newport News Shipbuilding, and Mission Technologies. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is headquartered in Newport News, Virginia and employs over 44,000 people domestically and internationally.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. generates revenue primarily through contracts with the U. S. Government, including the U. S. Navy, U. S. Coast Guard, Department of Defense, and Department of Energy. The company earns income from the design, construction, repair, maintenance, and overhaul of naval vessels, as well as from the development and delivery of advanced technology systems such as command, control, computers, communications, cyber, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C5ISR) platforms. Revenue is also derived from unmanned systems, nuclear propulsion support, fleet services, and training solutions for military and federal agency customers.

The company operates through the following segments: Ingalls Shipbuilding, Newport News Shipbuilding, and Mission Technologies.

• Ingalls Shipbuilding: This segment focuses on the design and construction of non-nuclear ships for the U. S. Navy and U. S. Coast Guard, including amphibious assault ships, surface combatants, and national security cutters. Ingalls is the sole builder of amphibious assault ships such as the LHA and LPD classes for the U. S. Navy and one of two builders of Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyers. The segment also constructs Legend class National Security Cutters for the U. S. Coast Guard under the service’s recapitalization program.

• Newport News Shipbuilding: This segment specializes in the design, construction, refueling, complex overhaul, and inactivation of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U. S. Navy. Newport News is the exclusive prime contractor for nuclear aircraft carrier refueling and complex overhaul (RCOH) and one of only two U. S. companies capable of building nuclear-powered submarines. The segment builds Virginia class fast attack submarines and Columbia class ballistic missile submarines under teaming agreements with Electric Boat Corporation and has delivered the lead ship of the Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier.

• Mission Technologies: This segment provides integrated technology solutions across four groups: All-Domain Operations, Warfare Systems, Global Security, and Unmanned Systems. It develops C5ISR systems, applies artificial intelligence and machine learning to defense platforms, designs cyber and electronic warfare capabilities, and delivers live, virtual, and constructive training environments. The segment also creates unmanned underwater and surface vehicles for defense, marine research, and commercial use, serving customers in more than 30 countries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. holds a dominant position in the U. S. defense industrial base as the nation’s largest shipbuilder and a key provider of all-domain defense technologies. The company faces limited competition in nuclear shipbuilding and certain non-nuclear ship classes due to high barriers to entry, specialized expertise, and long-term government relationships. Key competitors include General Dynamics Corporation, particularly in submarine construction and certain surface combatant programs, while Mission Technologies contends with mid-sized to large aerospace and defense firms and emerging technology providers in the C5ISR and unmanned systems markets.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. derives the majority of its revenue from the U. S. Government, with approximately 81% of sales in 2025 coming from the U. S. Navy alone. The company also serves the U. S. Coast Guard, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and other federal agencies as primary customers. Its Mission Technologies segment additionally supports international customers in over 30 countries through unmanned systems and training solutions.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) is benefiting from a structural shift in U.S. naval strategy that is underappreciated by the market, as evidenced by the $151 billion Missile Defense Agency Shield contract award and the $25 billion Advanced Technology Support Program microelectronics contract secured in Q1 FY26. These multi-year, ceiling-level awards represent not just incremental revenue but a fundamental expansion of HII’s Mission Technologies division into high-margin, technology-driven domains such as cyber defense, data mesh, and autonomous systems—areas where the company has made significant pre-contract investments in partnerships with leading AI firms and autonomous vessel production. Management highlighted that these capabilities align directly with the Navy’s HEG (Higher, Faster, Further) strategy and the FY27 budget request’s emphasis on capability enablers like autonomous systems, suggesting that HII is positioned to capture disproportionate share of the growing unmanned and integrated defense technology spend, which could drive margin expansion beyond current shipbuilding-centric expectations.
The company’s distributed shipbuilding strategy, particularly the ramp-up of its Charleston, South Carolina facility, is creating a scalable, flexible capacity base that is not fully reflected in current guidance. Kari Wilkinson noted that Charleston added nearly 0.5 million earned hours in its first year of operation and is on track to double throughput in 2026 through increased structural fabrication and outfitting—progress that reduces bottlenecks at Newport News and Ingalls while enabling HII to absorb surges in carrier, submarine, and frigate demand without proportional increases in fixed overhead. This initiative, combined with a 30% year-over-year target growth in outsourcing hours, allows HII to convert backlog ($54 billion) into revenue more efficiently than historical trends suggest, potentially accelerating shipbuilding throughput improvements beyond the 15% full-year goal and supporting sustained double-digit revenue growth even as pre-COVID work winds down.
Despite near-term margin pressure from inflation and supply chain volatility, HII’s financial profile reveals hidden resilience: free cash flow generation is heavily back-loaded due to working capital cycles, with management explicitly stating they expect to generate approximately $1 billion of free cash flow in the second half of FY26 after a negative $461 million in Q1. This pattern is consistent with historical performance and is being aided by imminent R&D tax credits (expected to lower the effective tax rate to 17% for the year) and collections from nuclear and environmental joint ventures, which contributed a positive $13 million net cumulative adjustment in Mission Technologies during Q1. The market is underestimating the timing of these cash inflows and the operating leverage inherent in HII’s fixed-cost shipyard infrastructure, where incremental revenue from rising carrier (CVN-80/81/82) and submarine (Virginia Block VI, Columbia-class) volumes will flow through to earnings at a higher rate than current 5% operating margins suggest, especially as workforce proficiency improves with over 1,600 new hires and 200 apprentice graduates in Q1 alone.

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) is benefiting from a structural shift in U.S. naval strategy that is underappreciated by the market, as evidenced by the $151 billion Missile Defense Agency Shield contract award and the $25 billion Advanced Technology Support Program microelectronics contract secured in Q1 FY26. These multi-year, ceiling-level awards represent not just incremental revenue but a fundamental expansion of HII’s Mission Technologies division into high-margin, technology-driven domains such as cyber defense, data mesh, and autonomous systems—areas where the company has made significant pre-contract investments in partnerships with leading AI firms and autonomous vessel production. Management highlighted that these capabilities align directly with the Navy’s HEG (Higher, Faster, Further) strategy and the FY27 budget request’s emphasis on capability enablers like autonomous systems, suggesting that HII is positioned to capture disproportionate share of the growing unmanned and integrated defense technology spend, which could drive margin expansion beyond current shipbuilding-centric expectations.
The company’s distributed shipbuilding strategy, particularly the ramp-up of its Charleston, South Carolina facility, is creating a scalable, flexible capacity base that is not fully reflected in current guidance. Kari Wilkinson noted that Charleston added nearly 0.5 million earned hours in its first year of operation and is on track to double throughput in 2026 through increased structural fabrication and outfitting—progress that reduces bottlenecks at Newport News and Ingalls while enabling HII to absorb surges in carrier, submarine, and frigate demand without proportional increases in fixed overhead. This initiative, combined with a 30% year-over-year target growth in outsourcing hours, allows HII to convert backlog ($54 billion) into revenue more efficiently than historical trends suggest, potentially accelerating shipbuilding throughput improvements beyond the 15% full-year goal and supporting sustained double-digit revenue growth even as pre-COVID work winds down.
Despite near-term margin pressure from inflation and supply chain volatility, HII’s financial profile reveals hidden resilience: free cash flow generation is heavily back-loaded due to working capital cycles, with management explicitly stating they expect to generate approximately $1 billion of free cash flow in the second half of FY26 after a negative $461 million in Q1. This pattern is consistent with historical performance and is being aided by imminent R&D tax credits (expected to lower the effective tax rate to 17% for the year) and collections from nuclear and environmental joint ventures, which contributed a positive $13 million net cumulative adjustment in Mission Technologies during Q1. The market is underestimating the timing of these cash inflows and the operating leverage inherent in HII’s fixed-cost shipyard infrastructure, where incremental revenue from rising carrier (CVN-80/81/82) and submarine (Virginia Block VI, Columbia-class) volumes will flow through to earnings at a higher rate than current 5% operating margins suggest, especially as workforce proficiency improves with over 1,600 new hires and 200 apprentice graduates in Q1 alone.

▼ Bear case

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) faces persistent and underdiscussed margin compression risks in its core shipbuilding operations, particularly at Newport News, where segment operating margin declined 80 basis points to 5.3% in Q1 FY26 despite a 19.3% revenue increase. This divergence between revenue growth and margin deterioration signals that incremental volume is being absorbed by rising costs—labor, materials, and overhead—without proportional efficiency gains, contradicting management’s narrative of improving workforce proficiency. The company acknowledged that Newport News’ Q1 results were negatively impacted by a $9 million net cumulative adjustment (up from flat in Q1 FY25), driven by contract adjustments and incentives related to the Virginia-class submarine program, suggesting that prior-period benefits are not recurring and that current pricing on long-term contracts may not adequately reflect current cost inflation, especially as the shipyard transitions to higher-complexity post-COVID vessels like CVN-80 and Columbia-class submarines.
While HII emphasizes growth in Mission Technologies and autonomous systems, the division’s Q1 performance reveals fragility: revenue grew only 1.8% year-over-year to $748 million, and segment operating margin fell to 4.7% from 5.4%, with the decline in operating income attributed to timing of equity income from nuclear and environmental joint ventures—a non-recurring factor that masked underlying weakness in warfare systems and unmanned systems. Management’s optimism about future awards in autonomous systems (e.g., MUSV program) is speculative, as no production contracts were hinted at during Q&A, and the FY26–27 budget increases for unmanned systems may not translate to near-term revenue due to lengthy development cycles, integration risks with manned platforms, and intense competition from pure-play defense tech firms, leaving HII’s investment in Odyssey autonomy software and Romulus family systems vulnerable to write-downs if adoption lags.
The company’s reliance on outsourcing and distributed shipbuilding to drive throughput improvements introduces execution and integration risks that are not being adequately addressed. Kari Wilkinson acknowledged that Charleston operations are “tracking to plan” but provided no metrics on quality, rework rates, or schedule adherence for the nearly 0.5 million man hours generated, raising concerns that increased outsourcing could lead to coordination delays, interface failures, or costly rework when components arrive at Newport News for final integration—especially as the shipyard prepares for complex carrier overhauls (CVN-79 acceptance trials) and submarine deliveries (SSN-800 Arkansas). Furthermore, Thomas Stiehle admitted that Q2 free cash flow guidance ($-100M to +$100M) leaves HII dependent on generating ~$1B in H2 FY26, a target that hinges on uncertain timing of submarine contract awards, tax credit realization, and working capital reversals; any delay in the Virginia-class Block VI or Columbia-class submarine awards—which management conceded are held up by complicated approval processes—would directly undermine this cash flow recovery plan, exposing HII to liquidity strain despite its $1.9 billion liquidity buffer.

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) faces persistent and underdiscussed margin compression risks in its core shipbuilding operations, particularly at Newport News, where segment operating margin declined 80 basis points to 5.3% in Q1 FY26 despite a 19.3% revenue increase. This divergence between revenue growth and margin deterioration signals that incremental volume is being absorbed by rising costs—labor, materials, and overhead—without proportional efficiency gains, contradicting management’s narrative of improving workforce proficiency. The company acknowledged that Newport News’ Q1 results were negatively impacted by a $9 million net cumulative adjustment (up from flat in Q1 FY25), driven by contract adjustments and incentives related to the Virginia-class submarine program, suggesting that prior-period benefits are not recurring and that current pricing on long-term contracts may not adequately reflect current cost inflation, especially as the shipyard transitions to higher-complexity post-COVID vessels like CVN-80 and Columbia-class submarines.
While HII emphasizes growth in Mission Technologies and autonomous systems, the division’s Q1 performance reveals fragility: revenue grew only 1.8% year-over-year to $748 million, and segment operating margin fell to 4.7% from 5.4%, with the decline in operating income attributed to timing of equity income from nuclear and environmental joint ventures—a non-recurring factor that masked underlying weakness in warfare systems and unmanned systems. Management’s optimism about future awards in autonomous systems (e.g., MUSV program) is speculative, as no production contracts were hinted at during Q&A, and the FY26–27 budget increases for unmanned systems may not translate to near-term revenue due to lengthy development cycles, integration risks with manned platforms, and intense competition from pure-play defense tech firms, leaving HII’s investment in Odyssey autonomy software and Romulus family systems vulnerable to write-downs if adoption lags.
The company’s reliance on outsourcing and distributed shipbuilding to drive throughput improvements introduces execution and integration risks that are not being adequately addressed. Kari Wilkinson acknowledged that Charleston operations are “tracking to plan” but provided no metrics on quality, rework rates, or schedule adherence for the nearly 0.5 million man hours generated, raising concerns that increased outsourcing could lead to coordination delays, interface failures, or costly rework when components arrive at Newport News for final integration—especially as the shipyard prepares for complex carrier overhauls (CVN-79 acceptance trials) and submarine deliveries (SSN-800 Arkansas). Furthermore, Thomas Stiehle admitted that Q2 free cash flow guidance ($-100M to +$100M) leaves HII dependent on generating ~$1B in H2 FY26, a target that hinges on uncertain timing of submarine contract awards, tax credit realization, and working capital reversals; any delay in the Virginia-class Block VI or Columbia-class submarine awards—which management conceded are held up by complicated approval processes—would directly undermine this cash flow recovery plan, exposing HII to liquidity strain despite its $1.9 billion liquidity buffer.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Aerospace & Defense

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	BA	Boeing Co	1,106.33 Bn	575.32	12.00	47.21 Bn
2	RTX	RTX Corp	258.51 Bn	34.01	2.86	33.20 Bn
3	GD	General Dynamics Corp	174.86 Bn	40.28	3.25	8.01 Bn
4	LMT	Lockheed Martin Corp	119.99 Bn	25.03	1.60	20.70 Bn
5	HWM	Howmet Aerospace Inc.	107.26 Bn	61.54	12.44	4.69 Bn
6	TDG	TransDigm Group INC	76.18 Bn	40.87	8.02	31.28 Bn
7	NOC	Northrop Grumman Corp /De/	73.88 Bn	16.14	1.74	14.41 Bn
8	RKLB	Rocket Lab Corp	60.59 Bn	-331.77	89.15	0.00 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password