Coda Octopus
NASDAQ: CODA
$9.46 ▲ +0.16  (+1.72%)
At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap108.58 Mn
P/E27.84
P/S3.88
Div. Yield0.00
ROIC (Qtr)0.00
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-1.62
Add ratio to table…

About

Coda Octopus Group, Inc. operates three distinct business segments focused on underwater technology acoustic measurement and defense engineering. The company designs develops manufactures and sells real time volumetric imaging sonar systems such as the Echoscope family and Diver Augmented Vision Display units for commercial and defense diving. It also provides acoustic sensors hydrophone calibration services and supplies embedded subsystems for military programs. The…

Read more ↓
Sector: Industrials Industry: Aerospace & Defense CIK: 0001334325

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • The launch of the NanoGen series provides an ultra compact real time 3D imaging sonar that is being positioned as a core perception sensor for AI enabled autonomous underwater platforms. Management highlighted strong and accelerating interest from the US Navy and several allied foreign navies across their subsea vehicle programs. Many of these engagements are structured as product or platform improvement programs which allow integration onto already fielded systems with lower acquisition risk and predictable volume profiles. Successful completion of these near term programs could convert demonstrated technical leadership into recurring production contracts and sustained long term revenue streams. This addresses the market shift toward smaller networked autonomous vehicles where performance per unit cost and multi mission flexibility are critical.
  • The untethered DAVD variant has completed the hardening program and initial production of 16 systems has been delivered to the US Navy Mark 16 rebreather fleet for evaluation. These systems are currently undergoing the Authorization for Navy Use approval process which is seen as the catalyst for broader operational adoption. In parallel the company delivered two units to a very influential European Navy in the fourth quarter and plans to provide training in Q2 which could trigger follow on orders from that navy and its regional partners. Management expects that once ANU status is granted the revenue contribution will become less lumpy and more predictable with potential for larger volume purchases in the second half of fiscal 2026. This progression opens a sizable addressable market of approximately 14 000 potential government and defense divers in the United States alone plus comparable numbers in allied navies.
  • The acquisition of Precision Acoustics Limited in October 2024 added a recognized leader in underwater acoustics and measurement sensors to the group. This expands Coda Octopus expertise beyond imaging sonar into the broader acoustic sensor domain which is critical for maintaining its lead in real time 3D imaging underwater. The combined capabilities allow the company to compete for larger defense contracts that require integrated acoustic and imaging solutions. Early results show the business unit contributed 20 4% of consolidated net revenue and a gross margin of 58 6% while providing cross selling opportunities with existing Echoscope and DAVD offerings. Strategically the acquisition supports the stated goal of pivoting the marine technology business toward a multi year program based adoption model that generates recurring revenue.
  • As of October 31 2025 the company held 28 7 million dollars in cash and cash equivalents with no debt outstanding. This strong liquidity position provides flexibility to pursue accretive value added acquisitions without the need for additional financing or equity dilution. Management has repeatedly stated that cash deployment priorities favor acquisitions that enhance capabilities and create synergies rather than other uses such as dividend increases or share buybacks. The ability to fund growth internally reduces financial risk and enables rapid execution of the M&A pipeline that is already under active evaluation for fiscal 2026. A solid balance sheet also supports investment in working capital and research and development initiatives that can further differentiate the product suite.
  • The core business revenue mix shifted to 46% defense and 54% commercial marine in fiscal 2025 compared to about 40% defense the prior year. This indicates successful penetration of the defense sector where opportunities for multiple sales and long tail revenue are more prevalent than in the traditional commercial offshore market. Defense programs often involve platform integration and follow on orders which can produce predictable recurring revenue streams over the life of a vehicle class. By contrast the commercial marine rental business showed significant underutilization in fiscal 2025 reflecting weaker demand for offshore renewables projects and pressuring gross margins. Increasing the defense share reduces reliance on the volatile rental component and positions the company to benefit from structural growth in autonomous and AI enabled underwater systems.
▼ Bear case
  • Rental assets in the marine technology segment were significantly underutilized in fiscal 2025 leading to lower units of rentals and associated services. This underutilization directly impacted the gross profit margin of the business and reflects a broader slowdown in commercial offshore activity. Management attributed part of the weakness to changes in US policy on funding for offshore renewables which caused many projects to be shelved. Unless there is a rebound in offshore wind oil and gas investment the rental base may remain under pressure continuing to drag on overall margins. Investors should watch for any commentary on rental utilization trends as a leading indicator of commercial market health.
  • Consolidated gross margin declined to 66 5% from 69 8% year over year. The decrease was driven by the addition of the lower margin acoustic sensors and materials business and a shift in sales mix away from higher margin rental units. The acoustic sensors and materials business realized a gross margin of 58 6% which diluted the overall margin profile of the group. With the new business unit contributing over 20% of revenue the margin drag is likely to persist unless higher margin products can scale faster. This structural margin pressure could limit earnings growth even if top line expansion continues.
  • Total operating expenses increased by 24% to 13 1 million dollars in fiscal 2025. The main contributors were the integration of Precision Acoustics Limited which added 22 1% to operating costs and the weakening of the US dollar against the British pound and Danish kroner which raised expenses when translated into US dollars. Selling general and administrative expenses rose 27 9% reflecting the addition of the new business unit and the earn out provision from the acquisition. This expense growth outpaced the 30 7% increase in revenue causing operating margin to contract slightly from 17 6% to 17 1%. Continued pressure on operating costs could impede further margin improvement and limit the conversion of revenue gains into bottom line growth.
  • DAVD revenue remains lumpy and back ended with management noting that quantifying the budget is difficult until the product completes the Authorization for Navy Use approval process. The company anticipates beating the 3 7 million dollars of DAVD revenue achieved in fiscal 2025 but acknowledges that the timing of larger orders depends on US and European defense procurement cycles. Until ANU status is granted the revenue stream is dependent on evaluation systems and uncertain appropriations creating quarterly volatility. The dependence on continuing resolutions and potential delays in defense budget approval adds unpredictability to near term forecasts. Investors should be cautious about assuming smooth linear growth in DAVD sales given these external gating factors.
  • Defense engineering services revenue growth of 5 6% was partially impacted by delays in receiving contract awards due to the US government shutdown and the use of continuing resolutions to fund programs. This highlights the segment's exposure to fluctuations in government spending and the administrative timing of appropriations. When contract awards are postponed the associated engineering work and revenue recognition are deferred creating gaps in the financial results. The reliance on longstanding contracts does not fully insulate the business from the macro risk of congressional funding delays. Any prolongation of continuing resolutions or a future shutdown could repeat the revenue timing issues observed in fiscal 2025.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Aerospace & Defense
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 BA Boeing Co 1,106.33 Bn575.3212.0047.21 Bn
2 RTX RTX Corp 258.51 Bn34.012.8633.20 Bn
3 GD General Dynamics Corp 174.86 Bn40.283.258.01 Bn
4 LMT Lockheed Martin Corp 119.99 Bn25.031.6020.70 Bn
5 HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. 107.26 Bn61.5412.444.69 Bn
6 TDG TransDigm Group INC 76.18 Bn40.878.0231.28 Bn
7 NOC Northrop Grumman Corp /De/ 73.88 Bn16.141.7414.41 Bn
8 RKLB Rocket Lab Corp 60.59 Bn-331.7789.150.00 Bn