Barrick Mining Corp (NYSE: B)

$39.06 ▼ -0.50 (-1.26%)
As of Jun 09, 2026 04:00 PM
Sector: Basic Materials Industry: Gold CIK: 0000756894
Market Cap 1,048.41 Bn
P/E 10.82
P/S 77.36
Div. Yield 0.00
ROIC (Qtr) 0.00
Total Debt (Qtr) 4.67 Bn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) 66.71
Add ratio to table...

About

Barrick engages in the responsible production and sale of gold and copper, as well as related activities such as exploration and mine development. The company operates mines across North America, South America, Africa and the Middle East, delivering metals to global markets through a diversified portfolio of assets. Barrick generates revenue primarily from the sale of gold bullion to the spot market and independent refineries, the sale of gold and copper concentrate to independent smelting and trading companies, and the sale of copper cathode to...

Read more

Investment thesis

Bull case

  • Barrick’s financials in 2025 demonstrate an unprecedented acceleration in free‑cash‑flow generation, with operating cash flow surging by 194% and free cash flow exceeding $3.9 billion. The company’s ability to double net earnings from the prior quarter while simultaneously delivering record shareholder returns speaks to a robust operating leverage that will likely persist as the gold price stabilizes or climbs. This excess cash position has already enabled a $1.5 billion share‑repurchase and a 40% dividend hike, with management announcing a new dividend policy that targets 50% of attributable free cash flow. Such a shift indicates a commitment to capital allocation that should attract yield‑centric investors, while the company’s balance sheet remains debt‑light and liquid, reducing refinancing risk and preserving flexibility for future acquisitions or organic growth.
  • The announcement of a dedicated North American IPO for the company’s U.S. gold assets, including Carlin, Fourmile, and potentially other high‑grade sites, is a catalyst that could unlock a significant premium over the current conglomerate valuation. Management’s focus on showcasing the valuation of the North American portfolio is consistent with an industry trend toward spin‑offs where commodity‑specific subsidiaries can command higher multiples, especially in the U.S. market where regulatory and ESG frameworks are more mature. The IPO timing, positioned for late 2026, aligns with a projected upturn in gold demand from the Middle East and Asia, which would place the assets at a favorable valuation. A successful IPO would provide Barrick with a dedicated capital base for its North American operations and potentially reduce the overall discount to a focused gold business.
  • Operational improvements in Nevada are materialized through a rigorous mine‑plan review that re‑engineered production targets based on actual historical productivity, rather than top‑down projections. The results include a record 82% EBITDA increase and a 5% rise in gold production, driven largely by a 25% quarterly lift at Carlin. Management’s narrative that Carlin’s roaster achieved its highest throughput in five years underscores a successful transition to a proactive maintenance regime. This disciplined approach should sustain higher production and lower operating costs, thereby bolstering the company’s earnings profile over the next 2–3 years as the mine plans are fully realized and as new capital projects, such as the expansion at Fourmile, come online.
  • Barrick’s reserve and resource base remains one of the largest in the industry, with proven and probable gold reserves of 85 million ounces and an additional 150 million ounces in measured and indicated resources. The company’s commitment to further expand the Fourmile resource, as highlighted in the updated model, indicates a strong future production pipeline. The addition of 1 million ounces of new reserves at Kibali, along with ongoing exploration at other sites such as Veladero and Porgera, positions Barrick to sustain long‑term growth without significant dilution of reserves. This solid resource base provides a cushion against commodity price volatility and enhances the company’s ability to support future capital expenditures, which will be funded from its abundant cash generation and potentially from proceeds of the forthcoming IPO.
  • The company’s focus on safety, as evidenced by the management’s renewed emphasis on the "people go home safe" mantra, reflects a cultural shift that can mitigate operational risk and protect labor costs. While the incident at Sapient Health was highlighted, Barrick’s proactive approach to safety training, remuneration adjustments, and bonus simplification illustrates an internal alignment of incentives with production, costs, and safety. Such alignment is expected to reduce the probability of costly disruptions, thereby improving the predictability of cash flows. Moreover, a stronger safety culture can enhance Barrick’s reputation among local communities and governments, which is crucial for maintaining secure operating rights, especially in politically sensitive regions such as Mali and Balochistan.
Read more

Bear case

  • While Barrick’s financial performance is impressive, the company’s reliance on a single commodity exposes it to significant price risk. The management’s narrative around gold price assumptions for 2026 uses a $1,500 per ounce benchmark, yet the company has not provided a sensitivity analysis that accounts for potential downturns. In a scenario where the gold price falls to $1,200 or lower, operating margins could compress sharply, reducing the company’s ability to sustain the aggressive dividend policy and potentially forcing a payout cut or a shift back to share buybacks, which could erode shareholder confidence. The company's commitment to a 50% free‑cash‑flow payout leaves little room for margin erosion before impacting dividends.
  • The North American IPO, while potentially unlocking value, introduces a layer of governance and regulatory complexity that management has not fully disclosed. The Q&A revealed evasive answers regarding the structure of NewCo, governance rights, and alignment between Barrick shareholders and NewCo shareholders. The lack of transparency on how decision‑making authority will be distributed raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, especially in capital‑intensive projects where the parent might seek to influence NewCo’s strategy. If NewCo’s governance framework is not robust, it could lead to suboptimal investment decisions that compromise both entities’ long‑term value.
  • Operational challenges remain in several key assets. PV’s metallurgical recoveries are currently at 75–76% versus the 84% feasibility target, with the company admitting that the performance of weathered stockpiles is a “significant issue.” The planned improvement to 84% relies heavily on blending and yet‑to‑be‑released technical work, leaving uncertainty about whether the target will be met. Delays or failures in achieving higher recoveries could reduce net throughput and increase operating costs. Furthermore, Carlin’s production decline in the third quarter and the company’s admission that the recovery rate is lower than forecast could translate into a shortfall in expected cash flow, thereby impacting the company’s capacity to maintain its dividend growth trajectory.
  • The company’s focus on high cash returns to shareholders may limit its ability to fund strategic growth in an increasingly competitive mining landscape. By prioritizing a dividend payout over share buybacks, Barrick is foregoing a flexible tool that could be used to return excess cash in a tax‑efficient manner or to capitalize on market dips. Moreover, the decision to abandon the share‑buyback program may be viewed negatively by investors who prefer a balanced capital return approach, potentially reducing demand for the stock. The lack of a clear path for additional equity funding also raises concerns about the company’s ability to finance large capital projects or acquisitions without diluting existing shareholders.
  • Political and security risks are material, particularly in Mali and Balochistan. While the company has successfully resolved the Mali dispute and resumed control, it has not fully addressed the security concerns that led to the detention of personnel. The Q&A indicated that a review of the security situation is pending, and any escalation could jeopardise operations, reduce production, or lead to regulatory sanctions. In Balochistan, the company cited “escalation in security events” as a factor affecting financing, suggesting that external financing may be contingent on risk mitigation that has not yet materialised. These geopolitical risks add a layer of operational uncertainty that could materially impact the company’s cash flow and asset value.
Read more

Segment consolidation items [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical areas [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Gold
S.No. Ticker Company Market Cap P/E P/S Total Debt (Qtr)
1 SA Seabridge Gold Inc 2,186.27 Bn -61.81 - -
2 B Barrick Mining Corp 1,048.41 Bn 10.82 77.36 4.67 Bn
3 WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 429.35 Bn 0.00 228.32 -
4 AGI Alamos Gold Inc 144.86 Bn 0.00 69.90 0.37 Bn
5 GFI Gold Fields Ltd 136.49 Bn 8.90 15.60 2.74 Bn
6 KGC Kinross Gold Corp 110.14 Bn 58.08 13.83 0.74 Bn
7 NEM NEWMONT Corp /DE/ 106.92 Bn 12.73 4.28 5.08 Bn
8 EQX Equinox Gold Corp. 51.34 Bn 0.02 83.27 0.28 Bn