Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Work In Process (2010 - 2015)
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies' Work In Process was $186.07 million in Q2 2015, up 11.3% from $167.24 million a year earlier and up 4.1% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Work In Process (2010 - 2015) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2014, Work In Process at Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies came in at $154.09 million, up 12.1% from FY2013.
- Work In Process has now increased for four consecutive years, with a four-year compound annual growth rate of 17.4% (FY2010 to FY2014).
- In earlier years, Work In Process was $137.45 million in FY2013 (+6.1%), $129.61 million in FY2012 (+17.6%), $110.18 million in FY2011 (+35.6%) and $81.25 million in FY2010.
- The Q2 2015 figure marks the highest quarterly Work In Process in data going back to Q4 2010.
- Compared with a year earlier, Work In Process has increased for eight straight quarters, with growth averaging 14.2% over the last eight quarters.
- The best year-over-year quarter for Work In Process over five years was Q4 2011 (growth of 35.6%); the worst was Q2 2013 (a decline of 1.7%).
- Per Business Quant data, WAB's Work In Process in the three quarters before Q2 2015 was $178.81 million (Q1 2015), $154.09 million (Q4 2014) and $155.57 million (Q3 2014).
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar | 380.10 Bn | 351.79 Bn | 7.76 Bn |
| 2 | Amphenol | 208.03 Bn | 202.73 Bn | 3.55 Bn |
| 3 | Deere | 183.47 Bn | 192.23 Bn | 4.66 Bn |
| 4 | Eaton | 168.26 Bn | 165.49 Bn | 2.86 Bn |
| 5 | Parker-Hannifin | 122.34 Bn | 120.47 Bn | 2.25 Bn |
| 6 | Vertiv Holdings | 95.63 Bn | 86.25 Bn | 1.23 Bn |
| 7 | Emerson Electric | 87.72 Bn | 80.47 Bn | 2.66 Bn |
| 8 | 3M | 86.87 Bn | 68.33 Bn | 2.68 Bn |
| 9 | Illinois Tool Works | 76.08 Bn | 72.64 Bn | 1.90 Bn |
| 10 | Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies | 49.25 Bn | 46.76 Bn | 1.16 Bn |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2015 | 186.07 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2015 | 178.81 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2014 | 154.09 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2014 | 155.57 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 167.24 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 151.28 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2013 | 137.45 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 135.53 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 128.88 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2013 | 125.21 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2012 | 129.61 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2012 | 135.15 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 131.13 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2012 | 118.79 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 110.18 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2011 | 105.02 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 98.49 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2010 | 81.25 Mn |
API Access
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=WAB&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "WAB", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=WAB&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();