Parker-Hannifin (PH) Work In Process (2009 - 2014)
Parker-Hannifin's Work In Process came in at $786.11 million for fiscal Q3 2014 (quarter ended Mar 31, 2014), up 0.1% from $785.17 million a year earlier and up 1.1% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Parker-Hannifin (PH) Work In Process (2009 - 2014) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2013 (ended Jun 30, 2013), Parker-Hannifin's Work In Process was $733.03 million, up 5.9% from FY2012.
- Work In Process has increased in each of the last three fiscal years, with a four-year compound annual growth rate of 6.0% (FY2009 to FY2013).
- Going back by fiscal year, Work In Process was $692.04 million in FY2012 (+3.2%), $670.59 million in FY2011 (+18.9%), $564.2 million in FY2010 (-2.9%) and $581.27 million in FY2009.
- The five-year range for quarterly Work In Process is $560.41 million (fiscal Q3 2010) to $801.8 million (fiscal Q1 2014).
- Year-over-year, Work In Process increased in seven of the last eight quarters, with growth averaging 4.7%.
- The fastest year-over-year change in Work In Process over five years came in fiscal Q3 2011 (growth of 21.5%), and the weakest in fiscal Q4 2010 (a decline of 2.9%).
- Business Quant data shows PH's Work In Process at $777.67 million (Q2 2014), $801.8 million (Q1 2014) and $733.03 million (Q4 2013) in the three fiscal quarters before Q3 2014.
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar | 336.89 Bn | 308.59 Bn | 7.76 Bn |
| 2 | Amphenol | 196.03 Bn | 190.61 Bn | 3.55 Bn |
| 3 | Deere | 169.80 Bn | 137.90 Bn | 4.66 Bn |
| 4 | Eaton | 151.30 Bn | 148.49 Bn | 2.86 Bn |
| 5 | Parker-Hannifin | 120.33 Bn | 118.45 Bn | 2.25 Bn |
| 6 | Emerson Electric | 90.81 Bn | 83.55 Bn | 2.66 Bn |
| 7 | 3M | 88.88 Bn | 70.28 Bn | 2.68 Bn |
| 8 | Vertiv Holdings | 81.30 Bn | 71.92 Bn | 1.23 Bn |
| 9 | Illinois Tool Works | 79.03 Bn | 75.59 Bn | 1.90 Bn |
| 10 | Cummins | 74.92 Bn | 70.99 Bn | 2.47 Bn |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 | 786.11 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2013 | 777.67 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 801.80 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 733.03 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2013 | 785.17 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2012 | 780.02 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2012 | 768.88 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 692.04 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2012 | 720.19 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 726.72 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2011 | 710.27 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 670.59 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2011 | 681.06 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2010 | 639.32 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2010 | 623.87 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 564.20 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2010 | 560.41 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2009 | 566.48 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2009 | 580.47 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2009 | 581.27 Mn |
API Access
Parker-Hannifin Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=PH&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "PH", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=PH&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();