Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Cost of Revenue (2015 - 2026)
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) recorded Cost of Revenue of $9.71 million in Q2 2026, up 69.1% from $5.74 million a year earlier but down 5.3% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Cost of Revenue (2015 - 2026) Analysis & Trends
On a TTM basis, Mammoth Energy Services' Cost of Revenue came in at $28.01 million as of Jun 30, 2026, up 67.2% year-over-year; for FY2025, it came in at $24.16 million, down 0.9% from FY2024.
- Annual Cost of Revenue has declined for three straight years, with a five-year compound annual growth rate of -21.5% (FY2020 to FY2025).
- Across earlier years, Cost of Revenue came in at $24.38 million in FY2024 (-88.9%), $219.88 million in FY2023 (-8.9%), $241.32 million in FY2022 (+41.7%) and $170.28 million in FY2021 (+110.1%).
- Quarterly Cost of Revenue has ranged from -$4.61 million in Q4 2024 to $80.98 million in Q1 2023 over the past five years.
- On a year-over-year basis, Cost of Revenue rose in two of the last six quarters, with an average decline of 8.2%.
- Peak year-over-year performance for Cost of Revenue in the last five years was growth of 262.3% in Q4 2022, against a decline of 84.1% in Q1 2025 at the low end.
- Per Business Quant, the preceding three quarters came in at $10.25 million (Q1 2026), -$1.73 million (Q4 2025) and $9.78 million (Q3 2025).
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | Cost of Rev (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slb | 72.34 Bn | 69.45 Bn | 1.40 Bn | 7.58 Bn |
| 2 | Baker Hughes | 55.59 Bn | 18.87 Bn | 1.58 Bn | 5.16 Bn |
| 3 | TechnipFMC | 27.02 Bn | 23.17 Bn | 684.70 Mn | 2.08 Bn |
| 4 | Halliburton | 26.54 Bn | 18.29 Bn | 804.00 Mn | 4.91 Bn |
| 5 | Nov | 6.72 Bn | 1.51 Bn | 521.00 Mn | 1.61 Bn |
| 6 | Noble | 6.50 Bn | 4.43 Bn | 239.27 Mn | 480.42 Mn |
| 7 | Transocean | 5.76 Bn | 3.47 Bn | 358.00 Mn | 608.00 Mn |
| 8 | Weatherford International | 5.72 Bn | 1.66 Bn | 333.00 Mn | 772.00 Mn |
| 9 | Kodiak Gas Services | 5.48 Bn | 5.25 Bn | 246.76 Mn | 144.36 Mn |
| 10 | Mammoth Energy Services | 134.76 Mn | -299.95 Mn | 16.34 Mn | 9.71 Mn |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | 9.71 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2026 | 10.25 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2025 | -1.73 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 9.78 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 5.74 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2025 | 5.48 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2024 | -4.61 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2024 | 10.15 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2024 | 9.62 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2024 | 34.48 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2023 | 40.97 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2023 | 45.08 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2023 | 52.85 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2023 | 80.98 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2022 | 67.50 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2022 | 68.82 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2022 | 58.43 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2022 | 54.35 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2021 | 18.63 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2021 | 53.40 Mn |
API Access
Mammoth Energy Services Cost of Revenue API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=TUSK&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "cost-of-revenue", "ticker": "TUSK", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=TUSK&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();