Tetra Technologies (TTI) Cost of Revenue (2009 - 2026)
Tetra Technologies (TTI) reported Cost of Revenue of $123.04 million for Q3 2026, up 14.6% from $107.38 million a year earlier but down 5.6% from the prior quarter.
Tetra Technologies (TTI) Cost of Revenue (2009 - 2026) Analysis & Trends
Over the twelve months ended Sep 30, 2026, Tetra Technologies' Cost of Revenue came in at $467.67 million, up 10.7% year-over-year; for FY2025, it came in at $433.72 million, up 2.4% from FY2024.
- Cost of Revenue has a five-year compound annual growth rate of 9.8% (FY2020 to FY2025).
- By year, Cost of Revenue came in at $423.43 million in FY2024 (-3.4%), $438.17 million in FY2023 (+9.5%), $400.23 million in FY2022 (+35.7%) and $294.95 million in FY2021 (+8.7%).
- Five-year quarterly Cost of Revenue spans a low of $85.71 million in Q4 2021 and a high of $130.34 million in Q2 2026.
- Year over year, Cost of Revenue has now increased in each of the last five quarters, with growth averaging 3.4% over the last eight quarters.
- The high point for year-over-year Cost of Revenue in five years was Q3 2022 (growth of 35.7%); the low point was Q4 2024 (a decline of 16.1%).
- Per Business Quant data, the three quarters before Q3 2026 came in at $130.34 million (Q2 2026), $108.85 million (Q1 2026) and $105.43 million (Q4 2025).
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | Cost of Rev (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slb | 73.67 Bn | 71.28 Bn | 1.57 Bn | 7.88 Bn |
| 2 | Baker Hughes | 47.44 Bn | 9.59 Bn | 1.96 Bn | 6.07 Bn |
| 3 | Halliburton | 26.34 Bn | 18.29 Bn | 840.00 Mn | 4.86 Bn |
| 4 | TechnipFMC | 25.18 Bn | 21.15 Bn | 728.70 Mn | 2.17 Bn |
| 5 | Noble | 6.56 Bn | 4.64 Bn | 228.22 Mn | 500.54 Mn |
| 6 | Nov | 6.31 Bn | 1.25 Bn | 439.00 Mn | 1.79 Bn |
| 7 | Weatherford International | 6.11 Bn | 1.89 Bn | 374.00 Mn | 769.00 Mn |
| 8 | Transocean | 5.79 Bn | 3.83 Bn | 348.00 Mn | 589.00 Mn |
| 9 | Valaris | 5.48 Bn | 3.23 Bn | 176.30 Mn | 417.30 Mn |
| 10 | Tetra Technologies | 885.97 Mn | 495.98 Mn | 35.10 Mn | 123.04 Mn |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | 123.04 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 130.34 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2026 | 108.85 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 105.43 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 107.38 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 116.35 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2025 | 104.57 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2024 | 94.02 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2024 | 98.39 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2024 | 119.91 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2024 | 111.11 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2023 | 112.07 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2023 | 104.96 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2023 | 117.07 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2023 | 104.07 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2022 | 107.04 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2022 | 96.91 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2022 | 102.60 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2022 | 93.69 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2021 | 85.71 Mn |
Tetra Technologies Cost of Revenue API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=TTI&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "cost-of-revenue", "ticker": "TTI", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=TTI&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();