Geospace Technologies (GEOS) Work In Process (2012 - 2017)
Geospace Technologies (GEOS) recorded Work In Process of $1.83 million in fiscal Q3 2017 (quarter ended Jun 30, 2017), down 9.5% from $2.02 million a year earlier and down 37.9% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Geospace Technologies (GEOS) Work In Process (2012 - 2017) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2016 (ended Sep 30, 2016), Geospace Technologies reported Work In Process of $8.27 million, up 46.9% from FY2015.
- Annual Work In Process has a four-year compound annual growth rate of -19.4% (FY2012 to FY2016).
- Across earlier fiscal years, Work In Process came in at $5.63 million in FY2015 (-80.3%), $28.58 million in FY2014 (+13.6%), $25.16 million in FY2013 (+28.4%) and $19.59 million in FY2012.
- The fiscal Q3 2017 figure is the lowest quarterly Work In Process in data going back to fiscal Q4 2012.
- On a year-over-year basis, Work In Process rose in three of the last eight quarters, with an average decline of 27.4%.
- Peak year-over-year performance for Work In Process in the last five years was growth of 73.5% in fiscal Q1 2017, against a decline of 89.5% in fiscal Q1 2016 at the low end.
- Per Business Quant, the preceding three fiscal quarters came in at $2.94 million (Q2 2017), $3.79 million (Q1 2017) and $8.27 million (Q4 2016).
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar | 388.70 Bn | 360.40 Bn | 7.76 Bn |
| 2 | Amphenol | 214.42 Bn | 209.12 Bn | 3.55 Bn |
| 3 | Deere | 185.30 Bn | 194.07 Bn | 4.66 Bn |
| 4 | Eaton | 169.35 Bn | 166.59 Bn | 2.86 Bn |
| 5 | Parker-Hannifin | 122.64 Bn | 120.77 Bn | 2.25 Bn |
| 6 | Vertiv Holdings | 97.12 Bn | 87.74 Bn | 1.23 Bn |
| 7 | Emerson Electric | 90.13 Bn | 82.89 Bn | 2.66 Bn |
| 8 | 3M | 83.49 Bn | 64.94 Bn | 2.68 Bn |
| 9 | Illinois Tool Works | 74.89 Bn | 71.45 Bn | 1.90 Bn |
| 10 | Geospace Technologies | 62.09 Mn | 8.98 Mn | 496,000.00 |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | 1.83 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2017 | 2.94 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2016 | 3.79 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2016 | 8.27 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 2.02 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2016 | 2.87 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2015 | 2.18 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2015 | 5.63 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 8.65 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2015 | 20.86 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2014 | 20.76 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2014 | 28.58 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 29.01 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 24.09 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2013 | 27.50 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 25.16 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 34.79 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2013 | 26.98 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2012 | 24.49 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2012 | 19.59 Mn |
API Access
Geospace Technologies Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=GEOS&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "GEOS", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=GEOS&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();