Estee Lauder Companies (EL) Work In Process (2010 - 2019)
Estee Lauder Companies (EL) recorded Work In Process of $237 million in fiscal Q2 2020 (quarter ended Dec 31, 2019), up 24.1% from $191 million a year earlier and up 1.3% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Estee Lauder Companies (EL) Work In Process (2010 - 2019) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2019 (ended Jun 30, 2019), Estee Lauder Companies reported Work In Process of $268 million, up 20.7% from FY2018.
- Annual Work In Process has increased for four straight fiscal years, with a five-year compound annual growth rate of 6.9% (FY2014 to FY2019).
- Across earlier fiscal years, Work In Process came in at $222 million in FY2018 (+14.4%), $194 million in FY2017 (+9.6%), $177 million in FY2016 (+4.9%) and $168.7 million in FY2015 (-12.3%).
- Quarterly Work In Process has ranged from $122.7 million in fiscal Q2 2016 to $268 million in fiscal Q4 2019 over the past five years.
- On a year-over-year basis, Work In Process has increased for 16 consecutive quarters, with growth averaging 19.5% over the last eight quarters.
- Peak year-over-year performance for Work In Process in the last five years was growth of 26.7% in fiscal Q3 2019, against a decline of 17.0% in fiscal Q3 2015 at the low end.
- Per Business Quant, the preceding three fiscal quarters came in at $234 million (Q1 2020), $268 million (Q4 2019) and $218 million (Q3 2019).
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Procter & Gamble | 346.43 Bn | 302.42 Bn | 10.28 Bn |
| 2 | Colgate Palmolive | 69.04 Bn | 64.10 Bn | 3.30 Bn |
| 3 | Estee Lauder Companies | 34.63 Bn | 22.70 Bn | 2.74 Bn |
| 4 | Kenvue | 34.35 Bn | 29.97 Bn | 2.30 Bn |
| 5 | Kimberly Clark | 32.85 Bn | 30.17 Bn | 1.60 Bn |
| 6 | Church & Dwight | 22.69 Bn | 21.21 Bn | 693.90 Mn |
| 7 | Clorox | 9.84 Bn | 8.28 Bn | 804.00 Mn |
| 8 | e.l.f. Beauty | 6.00 Bn | 4.97 Bn | 398.84 Mn |
| 9 | Reynolds Consumer Products | 4.65 Bn | 4.32 Bn | 245.00 Mn |
| 10 | Interparfums | 3.78 Bn | 3.58 Bn | 223.53 Mn |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2019 | 237.00 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2019 | 234.00 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2019 | 268.00 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2019 | 218.00 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2018 | 191.00 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2018 | 197.00 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2018 | 222.00 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2018 | 172.00 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2017 | 157.00 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2017 | 164.00 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 194.00 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2017 | 157.00 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2016 | 140.00 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2016 | 148.00 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 177.00 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2016 | 137.90 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2015 | 122.70 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2015 | 132.80 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 168.70 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2015 | 133.30 Mn |
API Access
Estee Lauder Companies Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=EL&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "EL", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=EL&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();