ZG vs FTHM vs ABX Stock Comparison

Zillow, Fathom Holdings and Abacus Global Management Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZG Zillow Group, Inc.
$32.10 +14.6% 1M -53.4% 1Y
Market cap
$7.25B
P/E
131.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.81B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
2 wins
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.
$0.18 -64.0% 1M -88.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$406.93M
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Abacus Global Management leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Abacus Global Management 8, Zillow 2, Fathom Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZGFTHMABXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.25B $5.95M $803.07M ZG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 131.8x -0.2x 28.5x ABX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.7x — 8.9x ABX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.7% +4.3% +65.3% ABX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.0% -6.3% 10.5% ABX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.2% -42.0% 7.0% ABX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x -1.5x 2.9x FTHM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.4% -88.2% +61.7% ABX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -21.2%/yr -62.8%/yr -2.6%/yr ABX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.5% 120.2% 55.7% ZG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 20/100 71/100 ABX

Percentile Scorecard

ZGFTHMABX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZGFTHMABX
Valuation 59 #37 of 89 35 #12 of 18 86 #26 of 181
Growth 66 #28 of 81 13 #14 of 16 95 #7 of 110
Profitability 55 #35 of 76 20 #13 of 16 75 #32 of 127
Financial Health 75 #24 of 93 13 #14 of 16 40 #97 of 162
Shareholder Returns 98 #2 of 50 – 59 #32 of 76
Overall 71 20 71
  • ZG ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • FTHM ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • ABX ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZGFTHMABXSPY
1 month +14.6%-64.0%+6.9% +0.7%
3 months -5.7%-77.2%-17.8% +3.7%
6 months -28.0%-80.2%-9.3% +7.1%
Year to date -53.0%-82.2%+0.8% +12.8%
1 year -53.4%-88.2%+61.7% +11.9%
3 years -15.9%-94.0%+41.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year -5.6%-60.8%+12.2% +22.8%
5 years -69.6%-99.3%-12.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year -21.2%-62.8%-2.6% +10.9%
10 years +0.1%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +0.0%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureZGFTHMABXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.5%120.2%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.2%109.8%51.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.171.111.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.04-0.731.11 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.0%-99.4%-62.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.5%-88.2%-28.2% -1.2%
52-week high $73.87$1.52$12.00 $779.14
52-week low $27.70$0.17$5.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZGFTHMABX
P/E now vs peer median 133.0xmedian 39.2x -0.2xmedian 21.0x 29.1xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.4x 0.0xmedian 0.7x 3.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 17.3x -1.9xmedian 10.7x 11.0xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 20.3x -0.4xmedian 13.5x 9.4xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.8x 0.3xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 4.13median 1.52 -0.01median 0.56 -1.14median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZGFTHMABX
Revenue $2.81B $406.93M $267.28M
Gross profit $2.05B – $236.22M
Operating income $12.00M -$20.72M $85.02M
Net income $55.00M -$25.50M $28.20M
Free cash flow $258.00M -$13.58M $89.47M
R&D $611.00M $7.90M –
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $-0.76 $0.29
Cash & equivalents $572.00M $4.50M $23.39M
Total debt $1.44B $25.06M $330.61M
Shares (diluted) 227.90M 33.42M 98.46M
Enterprise value $3.10B -$13.13M $617.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
P/E 133.0x -0.2x 29.1x
P/FCF 28.0x -0.4x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 18.6x -0.5x 9.3x
P/S 2.6x 0.0x 3.2x
P/B 1.7x 0.3x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 0.7x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 23.5x -1.9x 11.0x
EV/EBIT 583.4x -1.3x 13.5x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 0.1x 4.3x
EV/FCF 27.1x -2.0x 12.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.0x -2.0x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.13 -0.01 -1.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.7% 4.3% 65.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 3.0% 77.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% – 65.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.5% – 76.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 109.0% 12.2% 152.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.0% 7.0% 31.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 188.7% -8.0% 2,295%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.0% 0.6% -6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 198.0% 11.2% 2,506%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.2% 22.2% -25.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -19.8% -9.0% 169.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.3% -4.7% 81.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.0% -9.4% 168.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% -4.5% 80.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Gross margin 72.9% – 88.4%
EBITDA margin 10.6% -3.4% 39.0%
Operating margin 0.4% -5.1% 31.8%
Pretax margin 2.1% -6.3% 17.0%
Net margin 2.0% -6.3% 10.5%
FCF margin 9.2% -3.3% 33.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% -3.3% 34.0%
Return on equity 1.3% -95.2% 6.6%
Return on assets 1.0% -35.0% 3.3%
Return on invested capital 0.2% -42.0% 7.0%
Return on capital employed 0.3% -74.2% 11.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 5.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 7.1x 0.5x 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue 12.9% 0.6% 8.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Debt / assets 8.8% 34.1% 38.1%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.1x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x -1.5x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 1.8x -1.8x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 18.8% 67.5% 49.9%
Equity / assets 81.2% 32.5% 50.1%
Interest coverage 0.7x – 2.2x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.59 2.08 1.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Dividend yield – – 2.3%
Net buyback yield 13.0% -106.4% 3.9%
Shareholder yield 13.0% -106.4% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZGFTHMABX
Forward P/E 13.7xFY2026 – 8.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.34FY2026 $-0.14FY2026 $0.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +42.7%FY2026 – +12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.9% – +26.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.04BFY2026 $472.49MFY2026 $269.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.8%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.5% +3.0% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZGFTHMABX
Held by institutions 18.3% 13.2% 28.7%
Institutions holding 264 42 149
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +35.1% +1.0%
Institutions buying 125 14 79
Institutions selling 98 11 48
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.27 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZGFTHMABX
ZG 1.00 0.20 0.28
FTHM 0.20 1.00 0.19
ABX 0.28 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZG, FTHM and ABX?

Zillow (ZG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Zillow (ZG) $7.25B, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) $5.95M, Abacus Global Management (ABX) $803.07M.

Which stock is cheaper, ZG, FTHM and ABX?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Zillow (ZG) 131.8x, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -0.2x, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 28.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abacus Global Management (ABX) is cheapest (Zillow (ZG) 13.7x, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 8.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zillow (ZG) +17.7%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) +4.3%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) +65.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) has the highest net margin (Zillow (ZG) 2.0%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -6.3%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 10.5%). On return on invested capital, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads (Zillow (ZG) 0.2%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -42.0%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 7.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Abacus Global Management (ABX) returned the most: Zillow (ZG) -53.4%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -88.2%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) +61.7%. Over five years, Abacus Global Management (ABX) compounded fastest (Zillow (ZG) -21.2%/yr, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -62.8%/yr, Abacus Global Management (ABX) -2.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zillow (ZG) has been the steadiest (Zillow (ZG) 51.5%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) 120.2%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZG, FTHM and ABX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.