ZG vs FTHM vs ABX Stock Comparison

Zillow, Fathom Holdings and Abacus Global Management Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (APPF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ZG Zillow Group, Inc.
$31.21 +10.0% 1M -55.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.91B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.86B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
3 wins
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.
$0.15 -31.8% 1M -88.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$406.93M
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Abacus Global Management leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Abacus Global Management 7, Zillow 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZGFTHMABXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.91B $4.89M $845.49M ZG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -61.2x -0.2x 30.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.3x — 9.0x ABX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% +4.3% +65.3% ABX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.0% -6.3% 10.5% ABX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.1% -42.0% 7.0% ABX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.3x -1.5x 2.9x ZG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.5% -88.2% +65.3% ABX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.0%/yr -64.8%/yr -2.3%/yr ABX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.4% 121.4% 55.5% ZG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 20/100 71/100 ABX

Percentile Scorecard

ZGFTHMABX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZGFTHMABX
Valuation 66 #31 of 89 35 #12 of 18 85 #31 of 200
Growth 36 #53 of 82 20 #13 of 16 95 #7 of 117
Profitability 46 #43 of 78 20 #13 of 16 76 #36 of 144
Financial Health 70 #29 of 95 6 #16 of 17 39 #101 of 166
Shareholder Returns 96 #3 of 55 – 61 #32 of 81
Overall 63 20 71
  • ZG ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • FTHM ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • ABX ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZGFTHMABXSPY
1 month +10.0%-31.8%+4.4% -5.9%
3 months -7.6%-80.0%-16.0% -4.6%
6 months -29.1%-81.7%-6.6% +0.2%
Year to date -54.3%-85.1%+2.5% +7.5%
1 year -55.5%-88.2%+65.3% +8.2%
3 years -13.3%-95.4%+28.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year -4.7%-64.3%+8.8% +19.0%
5 years -52.8%-99.5%-11.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year -14.0%-64.8%-2.3% +9.4%
10 years -7.9%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year -0.8%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureZGFTHMABXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.4%121.4%55.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.1%112.9%51.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.311.371.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.04-0.731.18 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.1%-99.5%-62.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -57.8%-89.9%-27.0% -5.9%
52-week high $73.87$1.49$12.00 $779.14
52-week low $27.70$0.15$5.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZGFTHMABX
P/E now vs peer median -62.2xmedian 42.4x -0.2xmedian 28.6x 29.6xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.5x 0.0xmedian 0.6x 3.2xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 49.1xmedian 17.4x -1.9xmedian 10.6x 11.2xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 21.5x -0.4xmedian 14.1x 9.6xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.9x 0.2xmedian 2.1x 2.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -6.67median 1.51 -0.01median 0.51 -1.16median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZGFTHMABX
Revenue $2.86B $406.93M $267.28M
Gross profit $2.07B – $236.22M
Operating income -$146.00M -$20.72M $85.02M
Net income -$113.00M -$25.50M $28.20M
Free cash flow $313.00M -$13.58M $89.47M
R&D $610.00M $7.90M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.50 $-0.76 $0.29
Cash & equivalents $602.00M $4.50M $23.39M
Total debt $392.00M $25.06M $330.61M
Shares (diluted) 225.31M 33.42M 98.46M
Enterprise value $3.45B -$14.19M $660.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
P/E -62.2x -0.2x 29.6x
P/FCF 22.5x -0.4x 9.6x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x -0.4x 9.4x
P/S 2.5x 0.0x 3.2x
P/B 1.7x 0.2x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 0.6x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 49.1x -1.9x 11.2x
EV/EBIT -46.1x -1.2x 13.7x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 0.1x 4.4x
EV/FCF 21.5x -1.9x 13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.1x -1.9x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.67 -0.01 -1.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% 4.3% 65.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 3.0% 77.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% – 65.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.1% – 76.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -58.7% 12.2% 152.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.2% 7.0% 31.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -253.1% -8.0% 2,295%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 0.6% -6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -301.6% 11.2% 2,506%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 22.2% -25.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.5% -9.0% 169.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.1% -4.7% 81.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.2% -9.4% 168.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.0% -4.5% 80.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Gross margin 72.5% – 88.4%
EBITDA margin 4.8% -3.4% 39.0%
Operating margin -5.1% -5.1% 31.8%
Pretax margin -3.7% -6.3% 17.0%
Net margin -4.0% -6.3% 10.5%
FCF margin 11.0% -3.3% 33.5%
Operating cash flow margin 15.6% -3.3% 34.0%
Return on equity -2.6% -95.2% 6.6%
Return on assets -2.1% -35.0% 3.3%
Return on invested capital -3.1% -42.0% 7.0%
Return on capital employed -3.4% -74.2% 11.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 5.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.9x 0.5x 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue 12.2% 0.6% 8.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Debt / assets 7.4% 34.1% 38.1%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.1x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.3x -1.5x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 1.3x -1.8x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 67.5% 49.9%
Equity / assets 79.4% 32.5% 50.1%
Interest coverage -7.0x – 2.2x
Current ratio 1.8x 0.8x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 3.95 2.07 1.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZGFTHMABX
Dividend yield – – 2.3%
Net buyback yield 14.8% -127.6% 3.9%
Shareholder yield 14.8% -127.6% 6.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZGFTHMABX
Forward P/E 13.3xFY2026 – 9.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.34FY2026 $-0.14FY2026 $0.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +42.7%FY2026 – +12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.5% – +26.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.04BFY2026 $472.49MFY2026 $269.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.8%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +3.0% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZGFTHMABX
Held by institutions 100.0% 13.2% 28.7%
Institutions holding 264 42 149
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +35.1% +1.0%
Institutions buying 125 14 79
Institutions selling 98 11 48
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.27 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZGFTHMABX
ZG 1.00 0.23 0.29
FTHM 0.23 1.00 0.20
ABX 0.29 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZG, FTHM and ABX?

Zillow (ZG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Zillow (ZG) $6.91B, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) $4.89M, Abacus Global Management (ABX) $845.49M.

Which company is growing faster?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zillow (ZG) +15.1%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) +4.3%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) +65.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) has the highest net margin (Zillow (ZG) -4.0%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -6.3%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 10.5%). On return on invested capital, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads (Zillow (ZG) -3.1%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -42.0%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 7.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Abacus Global Management (ABX) returned the most: Zillow (ZG) -55.5%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -88.2%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) +65.3%. Over five years, Abacus Global Management (ABX) compounded fastest (Zillow (ZG) -14.0%/yr, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -64.8%/yr, Abacus Global Management (ABX) -2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zillow (ZG) has been the steadiest (Zillow (ZG) 53.4%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) 121.4%, Abacus Global Management (ABX) 55.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZG, FTHM and ABX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.