ZBRA vs COHR vs LPL Stock Comparison

Zebra Technologies, Coherent and LG Display Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OUST) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$321.64 -16.6% 1M +20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$15.34B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.14B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
COHR Coherent Corp.
$169.65 -49.9% 1M +26.0% 1Y
Market cap
$38.26B
P/E
39.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.91B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
6 wins
LPL LG Display Co., Ltd.
$2.49 -19.7% 1M -48.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.55B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.53B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Coherent leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Coherent 6, Zebra Technologies 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZBRACOHRLPLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.34B $38.26B $2.55B COHR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.5x 39.7x -5.5x ZBRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 18.9x — ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.9% +30.8% -6.9% COHR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.8% 12.2% -2.7% COHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.9% 7.4% 3.3% ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 1.3x — COHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.8% +26.0% -48.4% COHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.0%/yr +21.4%/yr -22.0%/yr COHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.4% 91.5% 61.7% ZBRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 43/100 52/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

ZBRACOHRLPL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZBRACOHRLPL
Valuation 66 #39 of 112 30 #79 of 112 93 #9 of 112
Growth 68 #35 of 108 75 #28 of 108 72 #31 of 108
Profitability 84 #18 of 104 46 #57 of 104 35 #68 of 104
Financial Health 18 #95 of 116 43 #67 of 116 8 #107 of 116
Shareholder Returns 95 #5 of 83 24 #63 of 83 –
Overall 66 43 52
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • COHR ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZBRACOHRLPLSPY
1 month -16.6%-49.9%-19.7% -5.9%
3 months -11.7%-49.3%-22.9% -4.6%
6 months +40.7%-46.8%-42.4% +0.2%
Year to date +32.5%-8.1%-40.9% +7.5%
1 year +20.8%+26.0%-48.4% +8.2%
3 years +56.1%+416.9%-52.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year +16.0%+73.0%-21.8% +19.0%
5 years -47.1%+164.0%-71.0% +56.5%
5 years, per year -12.0%+21.4%-22.0% +9.4%
10 years +410.8%+528.3%-78.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year +17.7%+20.2%-14.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureZBRACOHRLPLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.4%91.5%61.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.2%98.6%68.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.553.452.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.450.28-0.78 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-62.9%-76.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.7%-60.3%-56.8% -5.9%
52-week high $391.00$426.89$5.76 $779.14
52-week low $199.30$134.63$2.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZBRACOHRLPL
P/E now vs peer median 25.3xmedian 25.2x 34.6xmedian 25.2x -5.4xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.4x 4.2xmedian 2.4x 0.1xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 16.2x 20.8xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 23.4x -18.2xmedian 23.4x 1.8xmedian 23.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 2.3x 2.9xmedian 2.3x 0.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.18median 0.98 0.64median 0.98 -0.11median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZBRACOHRLPL
Revenue $6.14B $7.91B $17.53B
Gross profit $3.00B $3.02B $2.54B
Operating income $912.00M $1.17B $456.43M
Net income $602.00M $960.42M -$915.07M
Free cash flow $988.00M -$1.83B $1.37B
R&D $634.00M $804.67M $957.27M
EPS (diluted) $12.59 $4.77 $-0.58
Cash & equivalents $182.00M $1.55B $941.29M
Total debt $2.57B $4.00B $8.73B
Shares (diluted) 47.81M 202.03M 797.61M
Enterprise value $14.77B $31.24B -$1.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZBRACOHRLPL
P/E 25.3x 34.6x -5.4x
P/FCF 15.3x -18.2x 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.2x -565.2x 1.2x
P/S 2.5x 4.2x 0.1x
P/B 4.2x 2.9x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 5.3x 3.8x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 15.4x 20.8x –
EV/EBIT 19.2x 30.5x 22.3x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 4.5x 0.6x
EV/FCF 17.7x -19.4x 7.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.4x -603.2x 4.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.18 0.64 -0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZBRACOHRLPL
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.9% 30.8% -6.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 17.5% 0.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.1% 39.5% 18.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 26.8% 101.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.0% 121.5% 865.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 143.0% 29.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 17.6% 287.3% -141.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 74.7% 36.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.8% 668.9% 40.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.6% 54.4% 49.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 23.3% -111.2% 28.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 106.1% -27.6% -1.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.7% -2,585% 585.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 170.4% -88.1% 33.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZBRACOHRLPL
Gross margin 48.9% 38.2% 14.5%
EBITDA margin 18.6% 21.7% –
Operating margin 14.9% 14.8% 2.6%
Pretax margin 12.2% 12.5% -5.1%
Net margin 9.8% 12.2% -2.7%
FCF margin 16.1% -23.2% 7.8%
Operating cash flow margin 17.4% -0.7% 12.2%
Return on equity 17.2% 8.2% -18.1%
Return on assets 6.9% 4.9% -5.1%
Return on invested capital 11.9% 7.4% 3.3%
Return on capital employed 19.3% 7.4% 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x -0.1x -2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% 2.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZBRACOHRLPL
Debt / assets 29.1% 19.8% 48.9%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.3x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 1.3x –
Debt / FCF 2.6x -2.2x 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 59.5% 42.4% 72.2%
Equity / assets 40.5% 57.6% 27.8%
Interest coverage – 6.6x 0.6x
Current ratio 0.6x 2.3x 0.6x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.45 3.30 0.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZBRACOHRLPL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 6.2% -6.1% –
Shareholder yield 6.2% -6.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZBRACOHRLPL
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 18.9xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $22.61FY2026 $8.99FY2027 $-0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +42.7%FY2026 +60.2%FY2027 -187.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.6% +61.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.37BFY2026 $11.21BFY2027 $19.44BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.9%FY2026 +57.4%FY2027 +8.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +37.8% -4.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZBRACOHRLPL
Held by institutions 100.0% 86.7% 7.8%
Institutions holding 646 1,314 189
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% -3.1% +76.8%
Institutions buying 309 844 153
Institutions selling 242 359 22
Buyers to sellers 1.28 2.35 6.95

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZBRACOHRLPL
ZBRA 1.00 0.22 0.20
COHR 0.22 1.00 0.45
LPL 0.20 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZBRA, COHR and LPL?

Coherent (COHR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $15.34B, Coherent (COHR) $38.26B, LG Display (LPL) $2.55B.

Which stock is cheaper, ZBRA, COHR and LPL?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 25.5x, Coherent (COHR) 39.7x, LG Display (LPL) -5.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 14.2x, Coherent (COHR) 18.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Coherent (COHR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +16.9%, Coherent (COHR) +30.8%, LG Display (LPL) -6.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Coherent (COHR) has the highest net margin (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.8%, Coherent (COHR) 12.2%, LG Display (LPL) -2.7%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 11.9%, Coherent (COHR) 7.4%, LG Display (LPL) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Coherent (COHR) returned the most: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +20.8%, Coherent (COHR) +26.0%, LG Display (LPL) -48.4%. Over five years, Coherent (COHR) compounded fastest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -12.0%/yr, Coherent (COHR) +21.4%/yr, LG Display (LPL) -22.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has been the steadiest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 46.4%, Coherent (COHR) 91.5%, LG Display (LPL) 61.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZBRA, COHR and LPL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Coherent (COHR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.