XPO vs SFWL Stock Comparison

Xpo and Shengfeng Development Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XPO XPO, Inc.
$182.32 +5.3% 1M +45.0% 1Y
Market cap
$22.03B
P/E
54.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.57B
Div. yield
–
Trucking Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Xpo leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Xpo 2, Shengfeng Development 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXPOSFWLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.03B $68.20M XPO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.5x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +45.0% +553.3% SFWL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.4%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 270.0% XPO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

XPOSFWL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXPOSFWL
Valuation 14 #117 of 136 –
Growth 86 #18 of 122 –
Profitability 60 #47 of 116 –
Financial Health 24 #110 of 144 43 #83 of 144
Shareholder Returns 28 #59 of 82 –
Overall 42 –
  • XPO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SFWL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXPOSFWLSPY
1 month +5.3%-34.4% -0.8%
3 months -12.4%+638.1% +3.5%
6 months -17.1%+596.6% +7.0%
Year to date +34.1%+552.6% +12.2%
1 year +45.0%+553.3% +13.0%
3 years +170.8%-51.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +39.4%-21.6% +23.1%
5 years +262.0%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +29.4%— +11.0%
10 years +1,430.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +31.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXPOSFWLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%270.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.4%82.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.20-0.93 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.072.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.3%-95.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.2%-45.7% -1.8%
52-week high $228.37$11.43 $779.14
52-week low $123.66$0.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXPOSFWL
P/E now vs peer median 52.8xmedian 16.1x —median 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.3xmedian 11.5x —median 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 1.2x 0.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.77median 0.81 —median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXPOSFWL
Revenue $8.57B –
Operating income $752.00M –
Net income $404.00M –
Free cash flow $588.00M –
EPS (diluted) $3.42 –
Cash & equivalents $298.00M $16.90M
Total debt $3.21B $212.66M
Shares (diluted) 118.00M 5.50M
Enterprise value $20.85B -$65.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXPOSFWL
P/E 52.8x –
P/FCF 36.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 19.6x –
P/S 2.5x –
P/B 10.9x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 12.7x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 18.9x –
EV/EBIT 32.2x –
EV/Revenue 2.8x –
EV/FCF 41.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 22.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXPOSFWL
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 17.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 68.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 18.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 281.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 145.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXPOSFWL
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 15.0% –
Operating margin 8.8% –
Pretax margin 6.4% –
Net margin 4.7% –
FCF margin 6.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 12.7% –
Return on equity 21.2% –
Return on assets 4.9% –
Return on invested capital 10.8% –
Return on capital employed 11.6% –
Asset turnover 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXPOSFWL
Debt / assets 38.5% 23.6%
Debt / equity 1.6x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 5.5x –
Liabilities / assets 76.5% 57.4%
Equity / assets 23.5% 42.6%
Interest coverage 3.6x –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.53 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXPOSFWL
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXPOSFWL
Forward P/E 30.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.91FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +58.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +6.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.30BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXPOSFWL
Held by institutions 100.0% –
Institutions holding 749 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% –
Institutions buying 431 –
Institutions selling 211 –
Buyers to sellers 2.04 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XPOSFWL
XPO 1.00 -0.03
SFWL -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XPO and SFWL?

Xpo (XPO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xpo (XPO) $22.03B, Shengfeng Development (SFWL) $68.20M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Shengfeng Development (SFWL) returned the most: Xpo (XPO) +45.0%, Shengfeng Development (SFWL) +553.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xpo (XPO) has been the steadiest (Xpo (XPO) 42.0%, Shengfeng Development (SFWL) 270.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do XPO and SFWL move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.03, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, XPO and SFWL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xpo (XPO) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.