XHR vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Xenia Hotels & Resorts and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Xenia Hotels & Resorts leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Xenia Hotels & Resorts 3, Central North Airport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXHROMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.83B $4.77B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -253.0x 16.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +52.1% -3.6% XHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr +15.2%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.3% 31.2% XHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 46/100 XHR

Percentile Scorecard

XHROMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXHROMAB
Valuation 74 #39 of 145 28 #98 of 136
Growth 20 #114 of 142 –
Profitability 32 #93 of 136 –
Financial Health 41 #82 of 139 34 #95 of 144
Shareholder Returns 69 #42 of 131 74 #22 of 82
Overall 47 46
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXHROMABSPY
1 month +9.2%-3.9% -0.8%
3 months -8.3%-5.5% +3.5%
6 months +23.4%-10.9% +7.0%
Year to date +40.3%-9.0% +12.2%
1 year +52.1%-3.6% +13.0%
3 years +76.4%+74.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.8%+20.4% +23.1%
5 years +12.8%+102.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.4%+15.2% +11.0%
10 years +27.6%+104.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.5%+7.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXHROMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.3%31.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.4%28.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.531.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.91-0.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.2%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.1%-26.7% -1.8%
52-week high $21.82$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $12.30$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXHROMAB
P/E now vs peer median -253.4xmedian 27.4x 16.1xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 4.2x 5.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 14.2x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 23.2x 11.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 8.66median 2.11 —median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXHROMAB
Revenue $1.09B –
Gross profit $337.00M –
Operating income $73.11M –
Net income -$7.69M –
Free cash flow $115.51M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.08 –
Cash & equivalents $112.36M $172.32M
Total debt $1.36B $1.84B
Shares (diluted) 92.25M –
Enterprise value $1.29B $4.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXHROMAB
P/E -253.4x 16.1x
P/FCF 15.8x 11.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.1x –
P/S 1.7x 5.4x
P/B 1.6x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -9.6x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x –
EV/EBIT 42.1x –
EV/Revenue 2.8x –
EV/FCF 26.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.66 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXHROMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -30.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -111.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) -112.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -29.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 356.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXHROMAB
Gross margin 30.8% –
EBITDA margin 18.9% –
Operating margin 6.7% –
Pretax margin -0.6% –
Net margin -0.7% –
FCF margin 10.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.6% –
Return on equity -0.7% –
Return on assets -0.3% –
Return on invested capital 2.9% –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -23.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXHROMAB
Debt / assets 50.0% 43.4%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x –
Debt / FCF 11.8x –
Liabilities / assets 57.2% 63.1%
Equity / assets 42.8% 36.9%
Interest coverage 0.9x –
Current ratio – 1.3x
Quick ratio – 1.2x
Cash ratio – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXHROMAB
Dividend yield 2.8% 5.5%
Net buyback yield 2.7% –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) -9.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 0.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 32.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -68.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXHROMAB
Forward P/E – 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.02FY2026 $6.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -103.1%FY2026 +4.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +29.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.08BFY2026 $941.89MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.6% +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXHROMAB
Held by institutions 95.2% 12.3%
Institutions holding 298 163
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.2% +5.4%
Institutions buying 161 77
Institutions selling 90 59
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XHROMAB
XHR 1.00 0.29
OMAB 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XHR and OMAB?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.83B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.77B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) returned the most: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +52.1%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +2.4%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 0.00%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%. Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has been the steadiest (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do XHR and OMAB move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.29, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, XHR and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.