XHR vs OMAB vs PK Stock Comparison

Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Central North Airport and Park Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Xenia Hotels & Resorts leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Xenia Hotels & Resorts 6, Central North Airport 4, Park Hotels & Resorts 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXHROMABPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.91B $4.95B $3.39B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -264.7x 16.7x -20.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.5x 34.3x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.6% — -1.4% XHR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.7% — -6.4% XHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.9% — 0.7% XHR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x — 10.9x XHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.70% 5.28% 5.95% PK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +61.2% -0.2% +53.3% XHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.1%/yr +16.2%/yr -1.9%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.4% 31.4% 30.6% XHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 46/100 40/100 OMAB

Percentile Scorecard

XHROMABPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXHROMABPK
Valuation 72 #42 of 145 28 #98 of 136 68 #47 of 145
Growth 20 #115 of 143 – 3 #139 of 143
Profitability 33 #91 of 136 – 25 #102 of 136
Financial Health 38 #86 of 138 34 #93 of 140 25 #104 of 138
Shareholder Returns 65 #46 of 131 76 #20 of 80 82 #25 of 131
Overall 46 46 40
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXHROMABPKSPY
1 month +13.0%+3.7%+8.0% +0.7%
3 months +3.2%-5.2%+11.6% +3.7%
6 months +27.4%-3.3%+46.6% +7.1%
Year to date +46.5%-5.7%+60.8% +12.8%
1 year +61.2%-0.2%+53.3% +11.9%
3 years +78.9%+70.1%+46.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +21.4%+19.4%+13.5% +22.8%
5 years +16.4%+111.9%-9.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.1%+16.2%-1.9% +10.9%
10 years +33.9%+118.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +3.0%+8.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureXHROMABPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.4%31.4%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.5%28.0%27.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.541.100.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.24-0.011.75 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.2%-42.1%-58.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.0%-24.0%-1.0% -1.2%
52-week high $21.82$134.98$16.99 $779.14
52-week low $12.30$88.75$9.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXHROMABPK
P/E now vs peer median -264.7xmedian 25.7x 16.7xmedian 16.5x -20.6xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 4.1x 5.6xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 14.3x —median 8.8x 20.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 23.5x 12.2xmedian 11.9x 41.8xmedian 23.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.3x 7.8xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 9.05median 1.86 —median 0.84 0.38median 1.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXHROMABPK
Revenue $1.09B – $2.54B
Gross profit $337.00M – $756.00M
Operating income $73.11M – $52.00M
Net income -$7.69M – -$159.00M
Free cash flow $115.51M – $81.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.08 – $-0.82
Cash & equivalents $112.36M $172.32M $264.00M
Total debt $1.36B $746.90M $3.92B
Shares (diluted) 92.25M – 200.00M
Enterprise value $1.42B $4.44B $2.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXHROMABPK
P/E -264.7x 16.7x -20.6x
P/FCF 16.5x 12.2x 41.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.5x – 8.4x
P/S 1.7x 5.6x 1.3x
P/B 1.6x 7.8x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -10.0x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.3x – 20.9x
EV/EBIT 43.2x – 135.3x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – 2.8x
EV/FCF 27.3x – 86.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.4x – 17.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 9.05 – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXHROMABPK
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.6% – -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% – -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.0% – 1.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.5% – -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -30.4% – -79.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.2% – -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -111.5% – -333.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.8% – -61.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -112.2% – -379.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -29.3% – -54.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.2% – -2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.3% – -4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 356.7% – -56.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.7% – -29.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXHROMABPK
Gross margin 30.8% – 29.8%
EBITDA margin 18.9% – 13.2%
Operating margin 6.7% – 2.0%
Pretax margin -0.6% – -5.7%
Net margin -0.7% – -6.4%
FCF margin 10.6% – 3.2%
Operating cash flow margin 16.6% – 15.9%
Return on equity -0.7% – -5.1%
Return on assets -0.3% – -2.0%
Return on invested capital 2.9% – 0.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -23.7x – -2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXHROMABPK
Debt / assets 50.0% 43.4% 50.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x – 10.9x
Debt / FCF 11.8x – 48.3x
Liabilities / assets 57.2% 63.1% 59.9%
Equity / assets 42.8% 36.9% 40.1%
Interest coverage 0.9x – 0.3x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXHROMABPK
Dividend yield 2.7% 5.3% 5.9%
Net buyback yield 2.6% – –
Shareholder yield 5.3% 5.3% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) -9.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 0.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 32.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -68.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXHROMABPK
Forward P/E – 15.5xFY2026 34.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.02FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $0.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -103.1%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% +12.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.08BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $2.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.6% +19.6% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXHROMABPK
Held by institutions 95.2% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 299 163 397
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.2% +5.4% +9.7%
Institutions buying 161 77 218
Institutions selling 91 59 114
Buyers to sellers 1.77 1.31 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XHROMABPK
XHR 1.00 0.28 0.73
OMAB 0.28 1.00 0.26
PK 0.73 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XHR, OMAB and PK?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.91B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.95B, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.39B.

Which company is growing faster?

Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.6%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has the highest net margin (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -0.7%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) leads (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.9%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) returned the most: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +61.2%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -0.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +53.3%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +3.1%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.2%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has the highest dividend yield: Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.70%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.28%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 5.95%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has been the steadiest (Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.4%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.4%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XHR, OMAB and PK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.