XCH vs HRNNF vs ST Stock Comparison

Xchg, Hydro One and Sensata Technologies Holding Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BEEM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
XCH XCHG Ltd
$3.46 +4.5% 1M +127.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
HRNNF Hydro One Ltd
$38.85 +7.8% 1M +5.5% 1Y
Market cap
$23.30B
P/E
22.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
3.50%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sensata Technologies Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sensata Technologies Holding 5, Hydro One 2, Xchg 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXCHHRNNFSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.62M $23.30B $5.81B HRNNF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 22.8x 15.9x ST
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 23.0x 11.5x ST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +4.1% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 9.5% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.4% 8.2% ST
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.7x 2.3x ST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.50% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +127.6% +5.5% +26.6% XCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -5.6%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 331.4% 17.6% 39.5% HRNNF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 64/100 64/100 ST

Percentile Scorecard

XCHHRNNFST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXCHHRNNFST
Valuation – 29 #48 of 67 88 #26 of 203
Growth – 69 #21 of 65 71 #55 of 188
Profitability – 89 #8 of 63 70 #55 of 183
Financial Health 31 #50 of 72 51 #31 of 62 42 #125 of 216
Shareholder Returns – 83 #12 of 67 50 #76 of 152
Overall – 64 64
  • XCH ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • HRNNF ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • ST ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXCHHRNNFSTSPY
1 month +4.5%+7.8%-1.4% +0.7%
3 months +668.9%-6.9%-13.9% +3.7%
6 months +246.0%-9.6%-0.8% +7.1%
Year to date +206.2%-2.0%+24.1% +12.8%
1 year +127.6%+5.5%+26.6% +11.9%
3 years ——+21.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year ——+6.6% +22.8%
5 years ——-25.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——-5.6% +10.9%
10 years ——+14.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+1.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureXCHHRNNFSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 331.4%17.6%39.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 135.5%18.4%37.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.65-0.241.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.390.310.67 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-18.9%-72.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.1%-11.4%-22.9% -1.2%
52-week high $4.62$43.85$53.55 $779.14
52-week low $0.23$35.56$28.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXCHHRNNFST
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.6x 22.8xmedian 20.5x 16.4xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x —median 2.9x 1.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.9x 15.3xmedian 13.1x 9.8xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 30.1x 12.1xmedian 40.5x 9.4xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.9x 2.5xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 2.16median 2.14 2.39median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXCHHRNNFST
Revenue – – $3.85B
Gross profit – – $1.19B
Operating income – – $582.40M
Net income – $1.03B $366.60M
Free cash flow – $1.92B $641.20M
R&D – – $128.60M
EPS (diluted) – $1.70 $2.49
Cash & equivalents $11.41M $452.53M $553.40M
Total debt $29.61M $54.53B $2.40B
Shares (diluted) 3.50M 600.71M 147.00M
Enterprise value -$55.81M $22.20B $3.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXCHHRNNFST
P/E – 22.8x 16.4x
P/FCF – 12.1x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.1x 7.9x
P/S – – 1.6x
P/B 2.4x 2.5x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 2.7x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 15.3x 9.8x
EV/EBIT – 21.9x 13.5x
EV/Revenue – – 2.0x
EV/FCF – 19.2x 12.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 19.2x 10.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.16 2.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXCHHRNNFST
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 11.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -3.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 175.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 2.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 14.0% 1,505%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.9% 5.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 13.5% 1,492%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% 6.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.8% 28.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.7% 34.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.7% 17.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXCHHRNNFST
Gross margin – – 30.8%
EBITDA margin – – 20.9%
Operating margin – – 15.1%
Pretax margin – – 12.4%
Net margin – – 9.5%
FCF margin – – 16.7%
Operating cash flow margin – – 19.7%
Return on equity – 11.2% 12.2%
Return on assets – 3.6% 5.5%
Return on invested capital – 6.4% 8.2%
Return on capital employed – – 10.0%
Asset turnover – – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXCHHRNNFST
Debt / assets 19.7% 48.8% 35.8%
Debt / equity 0.8x 1.5x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.7x 2.3x
Debt / FCF – 7.3x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 68.1% 54.1%
Equity / assets 25.3% 31.9% 45.9%
Interest coverage – 3.3x 4.4x
Current ratio 1.2x – 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – 2.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXCHHRNNFST
Dividend yield – 3.5% 1.2%
Net buyback yield – – 0.4%
Shareholder yield – 3.5% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXCHHRNNFST
Forward P/E – 23.0xFY2026 11.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.46FY2026 $1.69FY2026 $3.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +4.3%FY2026 +5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.0% +19.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $34.13MFY2026 $7.16BFY2026 $3.79BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +36.0%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +2.5% +1.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXCHHRNNFST
Held by institutions – – 100.0%
Institutions holding – – 468
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +1.1%
Institutions buying – – 266
Institutions selling – – 149
Buyers to sellers – – 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XCHHRNNFST
XCH 1.00 -0.15 0.03
HRNNF -0.15 1.00 -0.11
ST 0.03 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XCH, HRNNF and ST?

Hydro One (HRNNF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xchg (XCH) $12.62M, Hydro One (HRNNF) $23.30B, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $5.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, XCH, HRNNF and ST?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hydro One (HRNNF) 22.8x, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 15.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) is cheapest (Hydro One (HRNNF) 23.0x, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 11.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xchg (XCH) returned the most: Xchg (XCH) +127.6%, Hydro One (HRNNF) +5.5%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +26.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Xchg (XCH) 0.00%, Hydro One (HRNNF) 3.50%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 0.00%. Xchg (XCH) and Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hydro One (HRNNF) has been the steadiest (Xchg (XCH) 331.4%, Hydro One (HRNNF) 17.6%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XCH, HRNNF and ST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.