WRD vs NVDA vs QCOM Stock Comparison

WeRide, Nvidia and Qualcomm Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AUR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
1 win
NVDA Nvidia Corp
$216.00 -4.0% 1M +16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.28T
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$302.97B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
8 wins
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$179.60 -11.1% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$194.85B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Nvidia leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Nvidia 8, Qualcomm 2, WeRide 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWRDNVDAQCOMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.35B $5.28T $194.85B NVDA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x 27.4x 21.0x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 24.7x 16.6x QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +244.8% +83.4% +1.9% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -243.6% 63.7% 21.0% NVDA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -24.9% 71.1% 20.5% NVDA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.2x 0.4x NVDA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.7% +16.0% +6.3% NVDA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +54.7%/yr +6.5%/yr NVDA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.2% 37.8% 53.1% NVDA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 73/100 62/100 NVDA

Percentile Scorecard

WRDNVDAQCOM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWRDNVDAQCOM
Valuation 58 #6 of 13 57 #41 of 95 80 #20 of 95
Growth 91 #2 of 12 97 #4 of 93 34 #62 of 93
Profitability 82 #3 of 12 99 #2 of 91 87 #13 of 91
Financial Health 50 #7 of 13 65 #36 of 101 28 #73 of 101
Shareholder Returns – 46 #41 of 75 80 #16 of 75
Overall 70 73 62
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • NVDA ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • QCOM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWRDNVDAQCOMSPY
1 month -24.4%-4.0%-11.1% -0.8%
3 months -25.8%+9.9%+5.6% +3.5%
6 months -48.8%-0.3%+19.5% +7.0%
Year to date -51.8%+15.8%+5.0% +12.2%
1 year -60.7%+16.0%+6.3% +13.0%
3 years —+433.3%+68.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+74.8%+19.1% +23.1%
5 years —+783.4%+36.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+54.7%+6.5% +11.0%
10 years —+11,873.4%+163.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+61.4%+10.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureWRDNVDAQCOMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.2%37.8%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%36.6%52.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.251.942.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.010.420.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-66.4%-45.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.3%-9.7%-28.5% -1.8%
52-week high $11.72$239.24$251.02 $779.14
52-week low $4.08$165.17$124.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWRDNVDAQCOM
P/E now vs peer median -5.8x 27.1xmedian 42.1x 20.5xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 17.8x 17.2xmedian 7.1x 4.3xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median — 25.7xmedian 27.5x 16.5xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.0x 41.0xmedian 37.2x 18.2xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.0x 22.7xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median — 0.16median 2.23 4.93median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWRDNVDAQCOM
Revenue $92.10M $302.97B $44.07B
Gross profit $39.20M $226.24B $23.90B
Operating income -$260.29M $197.58B $10.22B
Net income -$237.93M $192.88B $9.26B
Free cash flow – $127.01B $10.42B
R&D $219.70M $23.59B $9.89B
EPS (diluted) – $7.94 $8.66
Cash & equivalents $629.27M $22.44B $4.53B
Total debt $194.84M $33.37B $12.78B
Shares (diluted) – 24.29B 1.07B
Enterprise value -$1.69B $5.05T $154.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWRDNVDAQCOM
P/E -5.8x 27.1x 20.5x
P/FCF – 41.0x 18.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 38.7x 15.3x
P/S 14.0x 17.2x 4.3x
P/B 1.4x 22.7x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 23.0x 7.3x
EV/EBITDA – 25.7x 16.5x
EV/EBIT -2.7x 26.2x 19.0x
EV/Revenue 7.5x 17.1x 4.4x
EV/FCF – 40.7x 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 38.5x 15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.16 4.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWRDNVDAQCOM
Revenue growth (1Y) 244.8% 83.4% 1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 110.1% 4.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 142.5% 96.0% -0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 120.4% 3.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.9% 105.9% -15.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 163.5% 0.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% 122.7% -20.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 165.3% 2.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 125.0% -17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 167.9% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 74.4% -2.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 124.3% 12.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 76.3% -10.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 130.9% 14.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWRDNVDAQCOM
Gross margin 42.6% 74.7% 54.2%
EBITDA margin – 66.4% 26.8%
Operating margin -282.6% 65.2% 23.2%
Pretax margin -258.0% 75.8% 25.4%
Net margin -243.6% 63.7% 21.0%
FCF margin – 41.9% 23.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 44.3% 28.1%
Return on equity -24.1% 90.9% 33.7%
Return on assets -20.5% 66.5% 16.2%
Return on invested capital -24.9% 71.1% 20.5%
Return on capital employed -26.6% 80.0% 22.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.4% 7.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWRDNVDAQCOM
Debt / assets 6.3% 10.4% 22.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.2x 0.4x
Debt / FCF – 0.3x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 28.5% 51.8%
Equity / assets 82.5% 71.5% 48.2%
Interest coverage – – 14.8x
Current ratio 5.4x 4.6x 2.0x
Quick ratio 4.0x 3.0x 1.1x
Cash ratio 3.7x 1.5x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.03 38.73 6.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWRDNVDAQCOM
Dividend yield – 0.2% 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 1.0% 4.6%
Shareholder yield – 1.3% 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 36.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWRDNVDAQCOM
Forward P/E – 24.7xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.62FY2026 $8.76FY2026 $10.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +83.6%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +91.8% -3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $149.56MFY2026 $383.27BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.8%FY2026 +77.5%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +88.4% +85.7% -5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWRDNVDAQCOM
Held by institutions 26.0% 69.0% 79.7%
Institutions holding 110 5,922 3,029
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +4.0% +2.8%
Institutions buying 51 3,278 1,416
Institutions selling 35 2,313 1,332
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.42 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WRDNVDAQCOM
WRD 1.00 0.35 0.26
NVDA 0.35 1.00 0.19
QCOM 0.26 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WRD, NVDA and QCOM?

Nvidia (NVDA) is the largest by market capitalisation: WeRide (WRD) $1.35B, Nvidia (NVDA) $5.28T, Qualcomm (QCOM) $194.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, WRD, NVDA and QCOM?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (WeRide (WRD) -6.0x, Nvidia (NVDA) 27.4x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Nvidia (NVDA) 24.7x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: WeRide (WRD) +244.8%, Nvidia (NVDA) +83.4%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nvidia (NVDA) has the highest net margin (WeRide (WRD) -243.6%, Nvidia (NVDA) 63.7%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%). On return on invested capital, Nvidia (NVDA) leads (WeRide (WRD) -24.9%, Nvidia (NVDA) 71.1%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nvidia (NVDA) returned the most: WeRide (WRD) -60.7%, Nvidia (NVDA) +16.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.3%. Over five years, Nvidia (NVDA) compounded fastest (Nvidia (NVDA) +54.7%/yr, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: WeRide (WRD) 0.00%, Nvidia (NVDA) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%. WeRide (WRD) and Nvidia (NVDA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nvidia (NVDA) has been the steadiest (WeRide (WRD) 60.2%, Nvidia (NVDA) 37.8%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WRD, NVDA and QCOM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nvidia (NVDA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.