WPRT vs OSK vs DAN Stock Comparison

Aetherion Technologies, Oshkosh and Dana Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BWA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$142.77 +6.6% 1M +17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$8.85B
P/E
17.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.76B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
8 wins
DAN DANA Inc
$23.59 -15.4% 1M +14.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.57B
P/E
2.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.66B
Div. yield
0.02%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Oshkosh leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Oshkosh 8, Dana 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWPRTOSKDANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.04M $8.85B $2.57B OSK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x 17.8x 2.3x DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x 12.4x DAN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.4% +4.2% +3.7% OSK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -493.2% 4.6% 14.6% DAN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -39.8% 10.2% 0.0% OSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.6x 1.8x OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.5% +17.7% +14.5% OSK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -44.7%/yr +4.7%/yr +0.3%/yr OSK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.0% 39.7% 44.5% OSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 66/100 63/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

WPRTOSKDAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWPRTOSKDAN
Valuation 14 #176 of 204 90 #22 of 204 98 #6 of 204
Growth 36 #122 of 191 41 #113 of 191 84 #31 of 191
Profitability 4 #181 of 189 59 #79 of 189 46 #103 of 189
Financial Health 54 #103 of 221 51 #108 of 221 21 #176 of 221
Shareholder Returns – 90 #16 of 158 69 #50 of 158
Overall 27 66 63
  • WPRT ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • OSK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • DAN ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWPRTOSKDANSPY
1 month 0.0%+6.6%-15.4% -2.0%
3 months +2.2%-8.9%-14.4% -2.2%
6 months -6.0%-6.9%-31.9% +4.2%
Year to date +19.7%+13.6%-0.7% +10.6%
1 year -5.5%+17.7%+14.5% +10.4%
3 years -66.9%+51.1%+91.3% +73.6%
3 years, per year -30.8%+14.8%+24.2% +20.2%
5 years -94.8%+25.9%+1.5% +61.6%
5 years, per year -44.7%+4.7%+0.3% +10.1%
10 years -86.7%+160.8%+56.8% +261.3%
10 years, per year -18.3%+10.1%+4.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWPRTOSKDANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.0%39.7%44.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.5%38.5%47.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.631.331.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.450.33 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-43.5%-69.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.9%-19.8%-39.4% -3.2%
52-week high $2.47$177.94$38.93 $779.14
52-week low $1.54$118.59$19.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWPRTOSKDAN
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 25.4x 17.7xmedian 25.4x 2.3xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 0.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 14.5x 9.5xmedian 14.5x 6.3xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 23.6x 9.3xmedian 23.6x 17.7xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.2x 1.9xmedian 2.2x 1.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.10median 1.21 47.72median 1.21 0.02median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWPRTOSKDAN
Revenue $8.50M $10.76B $7.66B
Gross profit $952.00K $1.66B $725.00M
Operating income -$23.52M $734.30M $210.00M
Net income -$41.91M $498.50M $1.13B
Free cash flow -$8.83M $942.10M $143.00M
R&D $5.35M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.42 $8.01 $10.18
Cash & equivalents $23.95M $558.00M $331.00M
Total debt $972.00K $1.10B $1.34B
Shares (diluted) 17.34M 62.24M 109.50M
Enterprise value -$204.06M $7.16B $883.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKDAN
P/E -0.8x 17.7x 2.3x
P/FCF -3.7x 9.3x 17.7x
P/Operating cash flow -4.1x 7.7x 5.6x
P/S 3.8x 0.8x 0.3x
P/B 0.6x 1.9x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 2.3x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA -0.4x 9.5x 6.3x
EV/EBIT -0.4x 12.7x 16.9x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.9x 0.5x
EV/FCF -1.1x 9.9x 24.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.2x 8.2x 7.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.10 47.72 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKDAN
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.4% 4.2% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -70.1% 4.6% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -72.0% -10.1% 79.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -72.0% 2.4% -6.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -71.1% -22.8% 307.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.0% -1.5% 6.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.9% -25.2% 28,400%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.3% -1.5% 83.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.0% -22.4% 6,201%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 0.4% 108.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 16.3% 49.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 36.2% -8.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.5% 26.0% 180.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 69.7% 5.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKDAN
Gross margin 11.2% 15.4% 9.5%
EBITDA margin -267.3% 9.1% 7.3%
Operating margin -276.7% 6.8% 2.7%
Pretax margin -423.1% 5.9% 1.0%
Net margin -493.2% 4.6% 14.6%
FCF margin -103.9% 8.8% 1.9%
Operating cash flow margin -93.2% 10.5% 6.0%
Return on equity -29.3% 11.0% 56.6%
Return on assets -19.9% 4.9% 18.6%
Return on invested capital -39.8% 10.2% 0.0%
Return on capital employed -42.2% 10.5% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 2.3x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 0.4% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKDAN
Debt / assets 1.1% 10.7% 22.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.2x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 0.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF -0.1x 1.2x 9.4x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 55.6% 67.6%
Equity / assets 61.5% 44.4% 32.4%
Interest coverage -100.9x 6.1x 1.5x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.7x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -19.51 3.18 2.24

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWPRTOSKDAN
Dividend yield – 1.6% 1.9%
Net buyback yield 339.0% 3.9% 22.1%
Shareholder yield 339.0% 5.4% 24.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 4.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 35.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -12.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWPRTOSKDAN
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 12.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.37FY2026 $10.00FY2026 $1.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -7.3%FY2026 +413.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +46.4% +128.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.34MFY2026 $10.70BFY2026 $8.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -55.7%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +5.3% +34.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWPRTOSKDAN
Held by institutions – 100.0% 99.2%
Institutions holding – 601 343
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.1% +1.8%
Institutions buying – 310 169
Institutions selling – 188 126
Buyers to sellers – 1.65 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WPRTOSKDAN
WPRT 1.00 0.18 0.19
OSK 0.18 1.00 0.39
DAN 0.19 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WPRT, OSK and DAN?

Oshkosh (OSK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) $33.04M, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.85B, Dana (DAN) $2.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, WPRT, OSK and DAN?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -0.8x, Oshkosh (OSK) 17.8x, Dana (DAN) 2.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dana (DAN) is cheapest (Oshkosh (OSK) 14.3x, Dana (DAN) 12.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Oshkosh (OSK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -73.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.2%, Dana (DAN) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dana (DAN) has the highest net margin (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -493.2%, Oshkosh (OSK) 4.6%, Dana (DAN) 14.6%). On return on invested capital, Oshkosh (OSK) leads (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -39.8%, Oshkosh (OSK) 10.2%, Dana (DAN) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oshkosh (OSK) returned the most: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -5.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) +17.7%, Dana (DAN) +14.5%. Over five years, Oshkosh (OSK) compounded fastest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) -44.7%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.7%/yr, Dana (DAN) +0.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) 0.00%, Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%, Dana (DAN) 0.02%. Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) and Oshkosh (OSK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Oshkosh (OSK) has been the steadiest (Aetherion Technologies (WPRT) 54.0%, Oshkosh (OSK) 39.7%, Dana (DAN) 44.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WPRT, OSK and DAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oshkosh (OSK) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.