WM vs GLGI vs WCN Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Greystone Logistics and Waste Connections Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WM Waste Management Inc
$235.63 +13.9% 1M +10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$94.25B
P/E
30.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
1.55%
Solid Waste Industrials
8 wins
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$181.92 +16.8% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$45.87B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
0.77%
Solid Waste Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 8, Waste Connections 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMGLGIWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.25B $6.00M $45.87B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.8x -0.6x 37.2x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.2x — 33.7x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.2% -59.9% +6.3% WCN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -43.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -37.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -4.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.55% — 0.77% WM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.2% -78.0% +4.1% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr -24.6%/yr +6.5%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 116.5% 25.8% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 10/100 46/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

WMGLGIWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMGLGIWCN
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 29 #145 of 203 27 #12 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 0 #188 of 188 69 #5 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 6 #173 of 183 69 #5 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 7 #203 of 217 20 #13 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 61 10 46
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMGLGIWCNSPY
1 month +13.9%-15.4%+16.8% -0.2%
3 months -1.6%-12.0%+7.5% +3.9%
6 months +3.6%+37.5%+11.2% +8.2%
Year to date +7.2%-62.1%+3.7% +12.9%
1 year +10.2%-78.0%+4.1% +12.3%
3 years +46.0%-77.1%+42.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +13.5%-38.8%+12.4% +23.3%
5 years +49.6%-75.6%+37.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%-24.6%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +271.9%-12.0%+268.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.0%-1.3%+13.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWMGLGIWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%116.5%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%150.7%23.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.42-1.08-0.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.48-0.670.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-90.7%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.4%-76.3%-2.5% -1.2%
52-week high $246.51$0.93$186.62 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$0.15$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMGLGIWCN
P/E now vs peer median 30.8xmedian 33.2x -0.6xmedian 25.2x 37.2xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 3.3x 0.3xmedian 1.9x 4.6xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x -7.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 16.4x -1.2xmedian 21.7x 31.8xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 3.0x 0.7xmedian 2.3x 5.8xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.00median 2.81 0.01median 1.32 —median 2.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMGLGIWCN
Revenue $26.07B $22.12M $9.94B
Gross profit – -$2.92M –
Operating income $4.80B -$8.43M $1.76B
Net income $3.07B -$9.70M $1.13B
Free cash flow – -$5.06M –
EPS (diluted) $7.63 $-0.36 –
Cash & equivalents $247.00M $360.53K $95.69M
Total debt – $46.58M –
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 27.27M 253.86M
Enterprise value $94.25B $3.99M $45.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
P/E 30.8x -0.6x 37.2x
P/FCF 23.2x -1.2x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x -1.8x 18.1x
P/S 3.6x 0.3x 4.6x
P/B 9.6x 0.7x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 14.9x 0.7x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA – -7.0x –
EV/EBIT – -2.1x –
EV/Revenue 3.6x 0.8x 4.6x
EV/FCF – -3.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.2x -5.3x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.00 0.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.2% -59.9% 6.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% -28.0% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -133.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -31.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.9% -472.2% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% -51.5% 10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.7% -1,158% 82.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -50.9% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.3% -1,653% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.3% -56.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 95.1% -132.8% 4.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.6% -31.4% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -169.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -49.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Gross margin – -13.2% –
EBITDA margin – -11.3% –
Operating margin – -38.1% –
Pretax margin – -42.4% –
Net margin – -43.8% –
FCF margin – -22.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 43.8% -15.0% 25.4%
Return on equity 31.0% -94.7% 14.3%
Return on assets 6.6% -26.5% 5.3%
Return on invested capital – -37.9% –
Return on capital employed – -39.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.7x 0.3x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Debt / assets – 33.5% –
Debt / equity – 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -4.6x –
Debt / FCF – -2.4x –
Liabilities / assets 78.8% 75.0% 63.3%
Equity / assets 21.2% 25.0% 36.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 0.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio – 0.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – -1.82 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Dividend yield 1.5% – 0.8%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.5% – 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMGLGIWCN
Forward P/E 27.2xFY2026 – 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 – $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 – +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% – +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 – $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 – +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% – 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMGLGIWCN
Held by institutions 82.3% – 85.2%
Institutions holding 2,348 – 829
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% – +1.3%
Institutions buying 1,094 – 410
Institutions selling 901 – 303
Buyers to sellers 1.21 – 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMGLGIWCN
WM 1.00 0.11 0.76
GLGI 0.11 1.00 0.05
WCN 0.76 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $94.25B, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $6.00M, Waste Connections (WCN) $45.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 30.8x, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.6x, Waste Connections (WCN) 37.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.2x, Waste Connections (WCN) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Waste Connections (WCN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +10.2%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -78.0%, Waste Connections (WCN) +4.1%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +8.4%/yr, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -24.6%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest dividend yield: Waste Management (WM) 1.55%, Waste Connections (WCN) 0.77%. Greystone Logistics (GLGI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.4%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.5%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, GLGI and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.