WM vs GLGI vs WCN Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Greystone Logistics and Waste Connections Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LODE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WM Waste Management Inc
$230.86 +11.5% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$95.44B
P/E
31.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Solid Waste Industrials
9 wins
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$181.95 +17.0% 1M +8.0% 1Y
Market cap
$47.64B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 9, Waste Connections 1, Greystone Logistics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMGLGIWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.44B $4.91M $47.64B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.1x -0.5x 37.2x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.7x — 33.7x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.2% -59.9% +6.3% WCN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.8% -43.8% — WM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.4% -37.9% — WM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x -4.6x — GLGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% -79.3% +8.0% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.6%/yr -27.5%/yr +6.0%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 116.8% 25.6% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 11/100 45/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

WMGLGIWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMGLGIWCN
Valuation 47 #9 of 16 30 #142 of 203 27 #12 of 16
Growth 62 #6 of 14 0 #188 of 188 69 #5 of 14
Profitability 100 #1 of 14 6 #172 of 183 69 #5 of 14
Financial Health 7 #14 of 15 7 #202 of 216 14 #13 of 15
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 54 11 45
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMGLGIWCNSPY
1 month +11.5%-30.8%+17.0% +0.7%
3 months +2.0%-14.3%+9.4% +3.7%
6 months -0.7%-33.3%+10.5% +7.1%
Year to date +5.1%-69.0%+3.8% +12.8%
1 year +16.9%-79.3%+8.0% +11.9%
3 years +41.8%-82.9%+40.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +12.4%-44.5%+11.9% +22.8%
5 years +44.1%-80.0%+33.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +7.6%-27.5%+6.0% +10.9%
10 years +260.8%-28.0%+263.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.7%-3.2%+13.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWMGLGIWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%116.8%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.3%151.0%23.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.43-1.10-0.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.79-0.680.31 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-90.7%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-80.0%-2.5% -1.2%
52-week high $246.51$0.90$186.62 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$0.15$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMGLGIWCN
P/E now vs peer median 30.0xmedian 30.9x -0.5xmedian 25.8x 37.2xmedian 30.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 3.2x 0.2xmedian 1.9x 4.6xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 14.0x -6.6xmedian 14.6x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.5xmedian 17.3x -1.0xmedian 22.2x 31.8xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 2.8x 0.5xmedian 2.2x 5.8xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 2.86median 2.44 0.01median 1.45 —median 2.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMGLGIWCN
Revenue $26.07B $22.12M $9.94B
Gross profit $10.53B -$2.92M –
Operating income $4.80B -$8.43M $1.76B
Net income $3.07B -$9.70M $1.13B
Free cash flow $3.74B -$5.06M –
EPS (diluted) $7.68 $-0.36 –
Cash & equivalents $247.00M $360.53K $95.69M
Total debt $23.37B $46.58M –
Shares (diluted) 399.80M 27.27M 253.86M
Enterprise value $94.27B $2.90M $47.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
P/E 30.0x -0.5x 37.2x
P/FCF 24.5x -1.0x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.0x -1.5x 18.2x
P/S 3.5x 0.2x 4.6x
P/B 9.3x 0.5x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 14.5x 0.5x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA 14.8x -6.6x –
EV/EBIT 23.9x -2.0x –
EV/Revenue 4.4x 0.7x 4.6x
EV/FCF 30.7x -3.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.5x -5.0x 18.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.86 0.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.2% -59.9% 6.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% -28.0% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -21.0% -133.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.5% -31.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.9% -472.2% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% -51.5% 10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.7% -1,158% 82.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -50.9% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 21.1% -1,653% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.5% -56.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.1% -132.8% 4.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% -31.4% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.7% -169.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.8% -49.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Gross margin 40.4% -13.2% –
EBITDA margin 29.8% -11.3% –
Operating margin 18.4% -38.1% –
Pretax margin 14.9% -42.4% –
Net margin 11.8% -43.8% –
FCF margin 14.3% -22.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 25.2% -15.0% 25.4%
Return on equity 31.0% -94.7% 14.3%
Return on assets 6.6% -26.5% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 11.4% -37.9% –
Return on capital employed 12.0% -39.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 0.3x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Debt / assets 50.2% 33.5% –
Debt / equity 2.4x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x -4.6x –
Debt / FCF 6.2x -2.4x –
Liabilities / assets 78.8% 75.0% 63.3%
Equity / assets 21.2% 25.0% 36.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 0.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.2x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 2.93 -1.85 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMGLGIWCN
Dividend yield 1.6% – 0.8%
Net buyback yield 1.7% – –
Shareholder yield 3.3% – 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 48.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 39.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 13.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMGLGIWCN
Forward P/E 26.7xFY2026 – 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 – $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 – +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% – +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 – $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 – +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% – 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMGLGIWCN
Held by institutions 82.3% – 85.2%
Institutions holding 2,350 – 830
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% – +1.3%
Institutions buying 1,096 – 411
Institutions selling 901 – 303
Buyers to sellers 1.22 – 1.36

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMGLGIWCN
WM 1.00 0.12 0.75
GLGI 0.12 1.00 0.05
WCN 0.75 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $95.44B, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $4.91M, Waste Connections (WCN) $47.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, GLGI and WCN?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 31.1x, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.5x, Waste Connections (WCN) 37.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 26.7x, Waste Connections (WCN) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Waste Connections (WCN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest net margin (Waste Management (WM) 11.8%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -43.8%). On return on invested capital, Waste Management (WM) leads (Waste Management (WM) 11.4%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -37.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +16.9%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -79.3%, Waste Connections (WCN) +8.0%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +7.6%/yr, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -27.5%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Management (WM) 0.02%, Waste Connections (WCN) 0.00%. Greystone Logistics (GLGI) and Waste Connections (WCN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.8%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, GLGI and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.