WM vs GFL vs LODE Stock Comparison

Waste Management, GFL Environmental and Comstock Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CLH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WM Waste Management Inc
$239.38 +15.1% 1M +10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$96.86B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.67B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
8 wins
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$45.52 +8.7% 1M -1.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.86B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.00B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins
LODE Comstock Inc.
$1.71 -36.2% 1M -42.4% 1Y
Market cap
$128.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01M
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 8, GFL Environmental 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMGFLLODELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $96.86B $16.86B $128.50M WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.0x -336.6x -2.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.7x 74.6x — WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.2% +9.7% -69.1% GFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.1% -0.7% -6,012.3% WM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 7.6% — WM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 3.0x — GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.8% -1.2% -42.4% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.8%/yr +2.0%/yr -41.2%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 29.1% 80.3% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 50/100 21/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

WMGFLLODE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMGFLLODE
Valuation 47 #9 of 16 80 #4 of 16 7 #15 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 31 #10 of 14 15 #12 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 62 #6 of 14 8 #13 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 27 #12 of 16 73 #5 of 16
Shareholder Returns 43 #5 of 8 – 0 #8 of 8
Overall 54 50 21
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • LODE ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMGFLLODESPY
1 month +15.1%+8.7%-36.2% -1.0%
3 months +0.2%+14.7%-42.8% +2.9%
6 months +4.3%+12.6%-47.4% +6.4%
Year to date +9.0%+6.0%-54.5% +11.4%
1 year +10.8%-1.2%-42.4% +13.1%
3 years +54.8%+55.1%-58.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +15.7%+15.8%-25.3% +21.5%
5 years +45.6%+10.2%-92.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.8%+2.0%-41.2% +10.9%
10 years +284.8%—-97.6% +255.2%
10 years, per year +14.4%—-31.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureWMGFLLODESPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%29.1%80.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.5%27.9%81.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.420.242.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.51-0.04-0.53 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-42.9%-94.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.9%-2.1%-64.2% -2.5%
52-week high $246.51$46.51$4.77 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$33.54$1.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMGFLLODE
P/E now vs peer median 33.7xmedian 33.8x -335.8xmedian 33.8x -2.1xmedian 33.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.4x 2.4xmedian 3.4x 128.0xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 15.8x 8.4xmedian 15.8x -1.7xmedian 15.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 18.4x 6.2xmedian 18.4x -3.3xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 3.1x 2.2xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 4.14median 4.14 -12.11median 4.14 -0.09median 4.14

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMGFLLODE
Revenue $25.67B $7.00B $1.01M
Gross profit $10.49B $1.47B -$1.68M
Operating income $4.51B $1.71B -$59.32M
Net income $2.85B -$249.50M -$61.13M
Free cash flow $3.57B $2.72B -$39.16M
R&D – – $11.28M
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $-0.13 $-1.66
Cash & equivalents $557.00M $192.10M $31.41M
Total debt $93.65B $19.12B –
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 378.69M 36.71M
Enterprise value $95.77B $14.98B -$4.54M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMGFLLODE
P/E 33.7x -335.8x -2.1x
P/FCF 26.8x 6.2x -3.3x
P/Operating cash flow 14.7x 11.2x -4.3x
P/S 3.7x 2.4x 128.0x
P/B 9.6x 2.2x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 15.2x 3.1x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 8.4x -1.7x
EV/EBIT 26.3x 15.4x -1.7x
EV/Revenue 4.6x 3.8x 97.0x
EV/FCF 33.2x 9.7x -2.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x 17.4x -3.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.14 -12.11 -0.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMGFLLODE
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.2% 9.7% -69.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% -1.8% 95.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.6% 16.5% -248.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 12.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.3% 1.4% -34.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.1% -3.8% -43.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% -107.0% -11.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 8.6% -17.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.3% -101.4% 49.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.1% 27.7% 23.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.9% 13.9% -70.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.8% -8.3% -40.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.2% 7.7% -105.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.4% -2.6% -35.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMGFLLODE
Gross margin 40.9% 20.9% -165.6%
EBITDA margin 29.3% 44.5% -5,651%
Operating margin 17.6% 24.4% -5,846%
Pretax margin 14.1% -3.8% -5,767%
Net margin 11.1% -0.7% -6,012%
FCF margin 13.9% 38.9% -3,860%
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 21.6% -3,009%
Return on equity 28.6% -3.3% -40.7%
Return on assets 6.2% -1.2% -29.7%
Return on invested capital 10.7% 7.6% –
Return on capital employed 11.2% 8.9% -31.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -6.1x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 2.0% 63.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMGFLLODE
Debt / assets 50.3% 44.6% –
Debt / equity 2.4x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 3.0x –
Debt / FCF 6.5x 3.5x –
Liabilities / assets 78.6% 65.0% 27.3%
Equity / assets 21.4% 35.0% 72.7%
Interest coverage – 3.0x -68.6x
Current ratio 0.9x 0.8x 3.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.6x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 2.97 1.27 -2.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMGFLLODE
Dividend yield 1.5% 0.2% –
Net buyback yield 1.0% – -75.2%
Shareholder yield 2.5% 0.2% -75.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 40.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMGFLLODE
Forward P/E 27.7xFY2026 74.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $0.61FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% +23.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 $6.02BFY2026 $4.79MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026 +208.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +22.5% +827.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMGFLLODE
Held by institutions 82.3% 74.8% 57.0%
Institutions holding 2,348 323 107
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +10.3% +21.1%
Institutions buying 1,094 185 67
Institutions selling 901 101 22
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.83 3.05

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMGFLLODE
WM 1.00 0.41 -0.02
GFL 0.41 1.00 -0.01
LODE -0.02 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, GFL and LODE?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $96.86B, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.86B, Comstock (LODE) $128.50M.

Which company is growing faster?

GFL Environmental (GFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +7.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) +9.7%, Comstock (LODE) -69.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest net margin (Waste Management (WM) 11.1%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -0.7%, Comstock (LODE) -6,012.3%). On return on invested capital, Waste Management (WM) leads (Waste Management (WM) 10.7%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +10.8%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -1.2%, Comstock (LODE) -42.4%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +7.8%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +2.0%/yr, Comstock (LODE) -41.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Management (WM) 0.01%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.00%, Comstock (LODE) 0.00%. GFL Environmental (GFL) and Comstock (LODE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.1%, Comstock (LODE) 80.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, GFL and LODE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.