WM vs BBCP vs GFL Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Concrete Pumping Holdings and GFL Environmental Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LODE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WM Waste Management Inc
$235.63 +13.9% 1M +10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$90.81B
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
5 wins
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$44.99 +6.5% 1M -0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$16.23B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.00B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 5, Concrete Pumping Holdings 4, GFL Environmental 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWMBBCPGFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.81B $502.75M $16.23B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.6x 34.1x -324.0x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.2x 51.2x 72.6x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.2% +10.2% +9.7% BBCP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 3.4% -0.7% BBCP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.6% 7.6% GFL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x 3.0x GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.2% +52.3% -0.8% BBCP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr +2.2%/yr +2.0%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 47.1% 29.1% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 61/100 46/100 BBCP

Percentile Scorecard

WMBBCPGFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWMBBCPGFL
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 90 #6 of 52 73 #5 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 28 #27 of 37 23 #11 of 14
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 72 #11 of 37 54 #7 of 14
Financial Health 13 #14 of 16 38 #36 of 57 33 #11 of 16
Shareholder Returns – 77 #7 of 27 –
Overall 61 61 46
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • BBCP ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWMBBCPGFLSPY
1 month +13.9%-0.4%+6.5% -0.2%
3 months -1.6%-4.3%+14.9% +3.9%
6 months +3.6%+23.8%+12.1% +8.2%
Year to date +7.2%+45.0%+4.7% +12.9%
1 year +10.2%+52.3%-0.8% +12.3%
3 years +46.0%+45.7%+59.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +13.5%+13.4%+16.9% +23.3%
5 years +49.6%+11.5%+10.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%+2.2%+2.0% +10.9%
10 years +271.9%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.0%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureWMBBCPGFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%47.1%29.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%37.6%28.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.420.590.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.481.11-0.03 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -18.7%-49.7%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.4%-19.3%-3.3% -1.2%
52-week high $246.51$12.05$46.51 $779.14
52-week low $196.77$5.73$33.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWMBBCPGFL
P/E now vs peer median 30.8xmedian 33.2x 33.3xmedian 26.7x -331.9xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 3.3x 1.1xmedian 0.8x 2.4xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x 7.1xmedian 13.1x 8.4xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 16.4x 23.2xmedian 23.0x 6.1xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 2.4x 2.2xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.00median 2.81 -1.77median 0.57 -11.97median 2.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWMBBCPGFL
Revenue $26.07B $436.03M $7.00B
Gross profit – $170.20M $1.47B
Operating income $4.80B $56.93M $1.71B
Net income $3.07B $16.50M -$249.50M
Free cash flow – $21.12M $2.72B
EPS (diluted) $7.63 $0.29 $-0.13
Cash & equivalents $247.00M $42.98M $192.10M
Total debt – $418.74M $19.12B
Shares (diluted) 402.40M 51.10M 378.69M
Enterprise value $90.81B $335.68M $14.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWMBBCPGFL
P/E 30.8x 33.3x -331.9x
P/FCF 23.2x 23.2x 6.1x
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x 5.9x 11.1x
P/S 3.6x 1.1x 2.4x
P/B 9.6x 1.8x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 14.9x 2.8x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA – 7.1x 8.4x
EV/EBIT – 15.2x 15.3x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 2.0x 3.7x
EV/FCF – 41.0x 9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.2x 10.5x 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.00 -1.77 -11.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWMBBCPGFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.2% 10.2% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% -0.1% -1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 10.5% 16.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.5% 12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.9% 29.7% 1.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% -2.0% -3.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.7% 57.3% -107.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -18.9% 8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.3% 63.2% -101.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.3% -18.8% 27.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 95.1% 14.0% 13.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.6% -2.6% -8.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.4% 7.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 78.7% -2.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWMBBCPGFL
Gross margin – 39.0% 20.9%
EBITDA margin – 27.9% 44.5%
Operating margin – 13.1% 24.4%
Pretax margin – 5.6% -3.8%
Net margin – 3.4% -0.7%
FCF margin – 4.8% 38.9%
Operating cash flow margin 43.8% 18.9% 21.6%
Return on equity 31.0% 6.2% -3.3%
Return on assets 6.6% 1.8% -1.2%
Return on invested capital – 5.6% 7.6%
Return on capital employed – 6.9% 8.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.7x 5.0x -6.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWMBBCPGFL
Debt / assets – 46.1% 44.6%
Debt / equity – 1.6x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x 3.0x
Debt / FCF – 19.8x 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 78.8% 70.5% 65.0%
Equity / assets 21.2% 29.5% 35.0%
Interest coverage – 1.7x 3.0x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.7x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 1.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio – 0.6x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.09 1.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWMBBCPGFL
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.3% 0.2%
Net buyback yield – 2.4% –
Shareholder yield 1.5% 3.7% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWMBBCPGFL
Forward P/E 27.2xFY2026 51.2xFY2026 72.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +111.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.5% +63.2% +27.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.84BFY2026 $411.25MFY2026 $6.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026 +26.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +6.4% +22.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWMBBCPGFL
Held by institutions 82.3% 33.9% 74.8%
Institutions holding 2,348 127 323
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +5.2% +10.3%
Institutions buying 1,094 76 185
Institutions selling 901 31 101
Buyers to sellers 1.21 2.45 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WMBBCPGFL
WM 1.00 -0.08 0.41
BBCP -0.08 1.00 0.02
GFL 0.41 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WM, BBCP and GFL?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Management (WM) $90.81B, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) $502.75M, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, WM, BBCP and GFL?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Management (WM) 29.6x, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 34.1x, GFL Environmental (GFL) -324.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.2x, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 51.2x, GFL Environmental (GFL) 72.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +10.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) has the highest net margin (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 3.4%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, GFL Environmental (GFL) leads (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 5.6%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) returned the most: Waste Management (WM) +10.2%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +52.3%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -0.8%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Waste Management (WM) +8.4%/yr, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +2.2%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Waste Management (WM) 21.4%, Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 47.1%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WM, BBCP and GFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.