WCN vs OSK vs GFL Stock Comparison

Waste Connections, Oshkosh and GFL Environmental Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CWST) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$191.94 +24.4% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$48.02B
P/E
42.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
5 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$143.39 +8.0% 1M +19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$8.47B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.76B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Connections leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Waste Connections 5, Oshkosh 5, GFL Environmental 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWCNOSKGFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.02B $8.47B $17.02B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.4x 17.0x -75.9x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.5x 14.3x 73.0x OSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.3% +4.2% — WCN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 4.6% — WCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 10.2% 9.7% OSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 0.6x -0.1x GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.8% +19.1% +3.7% OSK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.4%/yr +4.5%/yr +2.7%/yr WCN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.7% 39.7% 29.4% WCN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 66/100 59/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

WCNOSKGFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWCNOSKGFL
Valuation 27 #12 of 16 91 #20 of 204 87 #3 of 16
Growth 69 #5 of 14 41 #114 of 191 15 #12 of 14
Profitability 77 #4 of 14 59 #78 of 189 46 #8 of 14
Financial Health 20 #13 of 16 52 #107 of 221 87 #3 of 16
Shareholder Returns 86 #2 of 8 91 #16 of 159 –
Overall 56 66 59
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • OSK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWCNOSKGFLSPY
1 month +24.4%+8.0%+7.1% -1.0%
3 months +16.7%-6.1%+9.9% -0.4%
6 months +25.1%-8.5%+24.4% +4.5%
Year to date +9.5%+14.1%+5.4% +12.4%
1 year +13.8%+19.1%+3.7% +13.6%
3 years +44.1%+51.8%+51.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year +13.0%+14.9%+14.8% +20.8%
5 years +42.8%+24.5%+14.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +7.4%+4.5%+2.7% +10.4%
10 years +288.7%+159.7%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +14.5%+10.0%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureWCNOSKGFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.7%39.7%29.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.1%38.6%28.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.161.320.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.540.480.13 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.5%-43.5%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-19.4%-2.7% -1.6%
52-week high $191.94$177.94$46.51 $779.14
52-week low $149.02$118.59$33.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWCNOSKGFL
P/E now vs peer median 42.6xmedian 31.0x 17.8xmedian 25.5x -74.6xmedian 31.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 3.4x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.3xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 15.2x 9.5xmedian 14.4x 5.1xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.4xmedian 18.1x 9.3xmedian 23.3x 6.4xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 2.9x 1.9xmedian 2.2x 1.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 3.59median 2.82 47.93median 1.16 1.05median 2.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWCNOSKGFL
Revenue $9.94B $10.76B –
Gross profit $4.24B $1.66B –
Operating income $1.76B $734.30M $1.72B
Net income $1.13B $498.50M -$385.60M
Free cash flow $1.25B $942.10M $2.64B
EPS (diluted) $4.50 $8.01 $-0.59
Cash & equivalents $95.69M $558.00M $296.50M
Total debt $9.45B $1.10B $14.20M
Shares (diluted) 251.87M 62.24M 378.69M
Enterprise value $47.67B $6.78B $15.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWCNOSKGFL
P/E 42.6x 17.8x -74.6x
P/FCF 38.4x 9.3x 6.4x
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x 7.8x 11.3x
P/S 4.8x 0.8x 2.3x
P/B 6.1x 1.9x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 2.3x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 17.6x 9.5x 5.1x
EV/EBIT 32.5x 12.7x 9.6x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 0.9x –
EV/FCF 45.9x 9.9x 6.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.7x 8.2x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.59 47.93 1.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWCNOSKGFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.3% 4.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 4.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.6% -10.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 2.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.8% -22.8% -0.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -1.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 82.2% -25.2% -110.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.9% -1.5% -45.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 86.3% -22.4% -106.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 0.4% -70.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.2% 16.3% 8.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 36.2% -6.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1.2% 26.0% 2.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 69.7% -2.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWCNOSKGFL
Gross margin 42.6% 15.4% –
EBITDA margin 32.9% 9.1% –
Operating margin 17.7% 6.8% –
Pretax margin 14.7% 5.9% –
Net margin 11.4% 4.6% –
FCF margin 12.6% 8.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 10.5% –
Return on equity 14.3% 11.0% -4.0%
Return on assets 5.3% 4.9% -1.5%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 10.2% 9.7%
Return on capital employed 9.1% 10.5% 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 2.3x -3.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWCNOSKGFL
Debt / assets 43.9% 10.7% 0.0%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 0.6x -0.1x
Debt / FCF 7.6x 1.2x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 55.6% 59.0%
Equity / assets 36.7% 44.4% 41.0%
Interest coverage 4.9x 6.1x 2.8x
Current ratio 0.7x 1.7x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.19 3.18 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWCNOSKGFL
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.5% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 2.1% 3.9% –
Shareholder yield 2.8% 5.4% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWCNOSKGFL
Forward P/E 35.5xFY2026 14.3xFY2026 73.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.40FY2026 $10.00FY2026 $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 -7.3%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.7% +46.4% +27.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.30BFY2026 $10.70BFY2026 $6.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +26.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after 0.0% +5.3% +22.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWCNOSKGFL
Held by institutions 85.2% 100.0% 74.8%
Institutions holding 832 601 323
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +5.1% +10.3%
Institutions buying 413 310 185
Institutions selling 303 188 101
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.65 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WCNOSKGFL
WCN 1.00 0.08 0.48
OSK 0.08 1.00 0.10
GFL 0.48 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WCN, OSK and GFL?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Connections (WCN) $48.02B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.47B, GFL Environmental (GFL) $17.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, WCN, OSK and GFL?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Connections (WCN) 42.4x, Oshkosh (OSK) 17.0x, GFL Environmental (GFL) -75.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Oshkosh (OSK) is cheapest (Waste Connections (WCN) 35.5x, Oshkosh (OSK) 14.3x, GFL Environmental (GFL) 73.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Waste Connections (WCN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Connections (WCN) has the highest net margin (Waste Connections (WCN) 11.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) 4.6%). On return on invested capital, Oshkosh (OSK) leads (Waste Connections (WCN) 7.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 10.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oshkosh (OSK) returned the most: Waste Connections (WCN) +13.8%, Oshkosh (OSK) +19.1%, GFL Environmental (GFL) +3.7%. Over five years, Waste Connections (WCN) compounded fastest (Waste Connections (WCN) +7.4%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.5%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Connections (WCN) 0.01%, Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.00%. Oshkosh (OSK) and GFL Environmental (GFL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Connections (WCN) has been the steadiest (Waste Connections (WCN) 25.7%, Oshkosh (OSK) 39.7%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WCN, OSK and GFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Connections (WCN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.