WCN vs OSK vs CLH Stock Comparison

Waste Connections, Oshkosh and Clean Harbors Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GFL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$191.63 +23.9% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$47.95B
P/E
42.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.94B
Div. yield
0.75%
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$136.79 +3.5% 1M +9.4% 1Y
Market cap
$8.38B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.76B
Div. yield
1.62%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$277.79 -12.7% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.65B
P/E
27.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.56B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Clean Harbors leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Clean Harbors 6, Oshkosh 4, Waste Connections 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionWCNOSKCLHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.95B $8.38B $14.65B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.5x 17.0x 27.7x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.4x 15.4x 26.0x OSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.3% +4.2% +10.1% CLH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 4.6% 8.0% WCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 10.2% 10.9% CLH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 0.6x 1.8x OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.75% 1.62% — OSK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.5% +9.4% +34.2% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.4%/yr +3.5%/yr +21.2%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 39.8% 25.4% CLH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 66/100 68/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

WCNOSKCLH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisWCNOSKCLH
Valuation 25 #13 of 17 89 #23 of 204 63 #7 of 17
Growth 71 #5 of 15 40 #115 of 191 79 #4 of 15
Profitability 79 #4 of 15 58 #80 of 189 86 #3 of 15
Financial Health 19 #14 of 17 51 #108 of 221 69 #6 of 17
Shareholder Returns 86 #2 of 8 91 #16 of 159 43 #5 of 8
Overall 56 66 68
  • WCN ranked among 17 companies in Waste Management
  • OSK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • CLH ranked among 17 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodWCNOSKCLHSPY
1 month +23.9%+3.5%-12.7% -5.9%
3 months +14.5%-10.9%-9.7% -4.6%
6 months +24.8%-10.6%-1.6% +0.2%
Year to date +9.3%+8.9%+18.5% +7.5%
1 year +15.5%+9.4%+34.2% +8.2%
3 years +44.7%+48.6%+79.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +13.1%+14.1%+21.6% +19.0%
5 years +42.6%+18.8%+161.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year +7.4%+3.5%+21.2% +9.4%
10 years +288.1%+147.7%+531.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year +14.5%+9.5%+20.2% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureWCNOSKCLHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%39.8%25.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.9%39.0%25.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.131.290.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.600.241.35 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.5%-43.5%-30.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.2%-23.1%-15.1% -5.9%
52-week high $191.94$177.94$327.10 $779.14
52-week low $149.02$118.59$201.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleWCNOSKCLH
P/E now vs peer median 42.5xmedian 31.3x 17.0xmedian 23.4x 27.7xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 3.2x 0.8xmedian 1.7x 2.2xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 15.3x 9.1xmedian 13.4x 12.8xmedian 15.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.4xmedian 17.7x 8.9xmedian 21.9x 29.3xmedian 17.7x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 2.0x 1.8xmedian 2.1x 4.7xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.58median 2.86 45.72median 1.02 1.91median 2.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsWCNOSKCLH
Revenue $9.94B $10.76B $6.56B
Gross profit $4.24B $1.66B $2.17B
Operating income $1.76B $734.30M $864.39M
Net income $1.13B $498.50M $528.36M
Free cash flow $1.25B $942.10M $500.54M
EPS (diluted) $4.50 $8.01 $9.99
Cash & equivalents $95.69M $558.00M $423.54M
Total debt $9.45B $1.10B $2.89B
Shares (diluted) 251.87M 62.24M 52.90M
Enterprise value $47.60B $6.69B $11.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricWCNOSKCLH
P/E 42.5x 17.0x 27.7x
P/FCF 38.4x 8.9x 29.3x
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x 7.4x 14.4x
P/S 4.8x 0.8x 2.2x
P/B 6.1x 1.8x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 2.2x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x 9.1x 12.8x
EV/EBIT 32.5x 12.2x 19.7x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 0.8x 2.6x
EV/FCF 45.9x 9.5x 34.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.7x 7.9x 16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.58 45.72 1.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricWCNOSKCLH
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.3% 4.2% 10.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 4.6% 7.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.6% -10.1% 17.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 2.4% 10.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.8% -22.8% 32.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -1.5% 13.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 82.2% -25.2% 36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.9% -1.5% 13.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 86.3% -22.4% 38.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 0.4% 14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.2% 16.3% 25.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 36.2% 12.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1.2% 26.0% 11.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 69.7% 17.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricWCNOSKCLH
Gross margin 42.6% 15.4% 33.1%
EBITDA margin 32.9% 9.1% 20.3%
Operating margin 17.7% 6.8% 13.2%
Pretax margin 14.7% 5.9% 10.9%
Net margin 11.4% 4.6% 8.0%
FCF margin 12.6% 8.8% 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 10.5% 15.5%
Return on equity 14.3% 11.0% 17.5%
Return on assets 5.3% 4.9% 6.6%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 10.2% 10.9%
Return on capital employed 9.1% 10.5% 12.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 2.3x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.4% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricWCNOSKCLH
Debt / assets 43.9% 10.7% 34.9%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.2x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 0.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 7.6x 1.2x 5.8x
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 55.6% 62.4%
Equity / assets 36.7% 44.4% 37.6%
Interest coverage 4.9x 6.1x –
Current ratio 0.7x 1.7x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.7x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.18 3.14 3.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricWCNOSKCLH
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.6% –
Net buyback yield 2.1% 4.1% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 2.8% 5.7% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusWCNOSKCLH
Forward P/E 35.4xFY2026 15.4xFY2026 26.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.41FY2026 $8.91FY2026 $10.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 -17.4%FY2026 +46.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.3% +52.9% -3.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.30BFY2026 $10.52BFY2026 $6.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 +1.0%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after 0.0% +6.1% +14.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersWCNOSKCLH
Held by institutions 85.2% 100.0% 93.5%
Institutions holding 832 601 660
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +5.1% 0.0%
Institutions buying 412 309 308
Institutions selling 303 188 246
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.64 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

WCNOSKCLH
WCN 1.00 0.08 0.35
OSK 0.08 1.00 0.17
CLH 0.35 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, WCN, OSK and CLH?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waste Connections (WCN) $47.95B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.38B, Clean Harbors (CLH) $14.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, WCN, OSK and CLH?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Waste Connections (WCN) 42.5x, Oshkosh (OSK) 17.0x, Clean Harbors (CLH) 27.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Oshkosh (OSK) is cheapest (Waste Connections (WCN) 35.4x, Oshkosh (OSK) 15.4x, Clean Harbors (CLH) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Clean Harbors (CLH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Waste Connections (WCN) +6.3%, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.2%, Clean Harbors (CLH) +10.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Connections (WCN) has the highest net margin (Waste Connections (WCN) 11.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) 4.6%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 8.0%). On return on invested capital, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads (Waste Connections (WCN) 7.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 10.2%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Waste Connections (WCN) +15.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) +9.4%, Clean Harbors (CLH) +34.2%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Waste Connections (WCN) +7.4%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +3.5%/yr, Clean Harbors (CLH) +21.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Oshkosh (OSK) has the highest dividend yield: Waste Connections (WCN) 0.75%, Oshkosh (OSK) 1.62%. Clean Harbors (CLH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Clean Harbors (CLH) has been the steadiest (Waste Connections (WCN) 25.6%, Oshkosh (OSK) 39.8%, Clean Harbors (CLH) 25.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, WCN, OSK and CLH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.